The court of public opinion

First there was the Duke Case, then sev­er­al oth­er cas­es where charges were filed that should not have been filed.

So what is up with this non­sense.

Are we watch­ing the end of the legal sys­tem in Amer­i­ca, some say that even­tu­al­ly we might see all cas­es tried in the media, appar­ent­ly with this casey antho­ny case, every­thing has changed, with video and even orange coun­try sher­rifs, doc­u­ments, (that alleged­ly should not be pub­lic or pub­lished pub­li­cal­ly) this has changed every­thing.

When you look at this sit­u­a­tion, it has not been a “nor­mal” tri­al, (nat­u­ral­ly because the state is try­ing to get the death panal­ty, in a case in which there is real­ly no “real” evi­dence that a mur­der even took place.

That is a seri­ous prob­lem more so if your liv­ing in Flori­da, because there is a ten­den­cy to over charge any sit­u­a­tion, they have this alleged sys­tem where they charge you far in excess of the crime, in hopes of influ­en­ce­ing the out­come of the accu­sa­tion.

Is that jus­tice? or is it extor­tion?

Think about it if you are unfor­tu­nate enough to live in flori­da and you Jwalk you alleged­ly might be charged with a felony.

If you break the law you might be charged with any crime  at all, say you run over a dog, in the street, the way it looks alleged­ly you might be charged with wreck­less homi­cide of a dog, in flori­da, you might get con­vict­ed, and spend the rest of your life in jail, sounds crazy right, but appar­ent­ly no proof is required these days.

So all you snow birds, you might think twice about vaca­tion­ing in Flori­da in the future, because the jus­tice sys­tem in Flori­da alleged­ly is real­ly screwed up.

When you think about how messed up this entire tri­al has been.

Can any­one have a fair tri­al any more, with the way that alleged­ly the state of Flori­da has decid­ed to try this case alleged­ly in the court of pub­lic opin­ion and the media foam­ing at the mouth, with greedy innu­en­do and injus­tice. 

You see com­ments online that are real­ly scary, when you exam­ine them and you have to won­der have we lost all com­mon sense in this sit­u­a­tion here and is the state of Flori­da respon­si­ble for this cir­cus of a tri­al where TV cam­eras are allowed in the court room of a death case, this changes every­thing, who can get a fair tri­al under these cir­cum­stances at all?

Think about it, you have alleged­ly the orange coun­ty sher­iffs office alleged­ly leak­ing doc­u­ments that you can find all over the inter­net, you have YouTube videos all over the inter­net. 

When you think about all the strange evi­dence that has been allowed into this court case you have to won­der about the judges moti­va­tions, when allow­ing cer­tain very ques­tion­able evi­dence into this death case. 

Is this girl guilty?

Yes, she is guilty as a moth­er that failed to pro­tect her daugh­ter from death. 

As a moth­er that failed to pro­tect her child.

As a moth­er that failed the father of the child.

As an igno­rant girl that dat­ed dif­fer­ent men and moral­ly
allowed for a ter­ri­ble home life for this child.

She is guilty of all of those things and more, but and here is real­ly what is impor­tant.

Did she plan to mur­der her child?

Did she have help?

Did she inten­tion­al­ly do all that she is accused of doing?

I think the answer alleged­ly has to be no.

Is she guilty and is she respon­si­ble yes, cer­tain­ly and she should be made to pay for that fail­ure.

how­ev­er, there is no evi­dence that a mur­der has tak­en place.

Sor­ry, the state of Flori­da has alleged­ly and typ­i­cal­ly over done this case, so watch out, if you date to ven­ture into the state of Flori­da, you might dou­ble park and get charged with a felony.

You might get a park­ing tick­et and be charged with the death penal­ty.