CNN Evil Cowards?

 

 Did CNN allow a know nothing coward to cast political aspersions with no evidence or even probable cause to believe what they were saying.

What was the evidence they had, what was the experience factor of this man who made this accusation?  Why did CNN allow this to go out on the air at all, when you have someone that allegedly and obviously perhaps did not know what he was talking about speak on national TV what does that say about who you are as a news organization.

 

 We have to ask what were they thinking…

In a news story that will shake you to your core, it should come as no surprise that our Media are so corrupt that they might stoop to producing a news segment that has no business in our society.

You may be wondering what this is about because the biggest news story yesterday was that for the first time since 2001 on September the 11th we as a nation will now have yet another date and time that we will never forget what we were doing when we heard the news that America has been a victim of terrorism.

911 is now another chapter in history, we remember it and even more importantly it taught us a lesson that when you become lax and when you allow your military to become less than effective that there is a price to pay for being stupid.

We learned that horrible things can happen when we let our guard down.

We learned a lot of things that can make it difficult to understand why these things happen.

But you know what else we have learned, that news is no longer the news, because yesterday CNN did something that was allegedly despicable, Cowardly and perhaps even Evil.

So, what did they allow this to happen, they did something that is wrong and it might even be illegal, they talked about a national event that involves an ongoing investigation as if they had knowledge about what was going on.

If that is true then someone needs to have a talk with CNN to find out what they knew and when they knew it…

This is specifiable because they attempted to politicize the horror and death of children live on the air and they tried to say that it was a right wind thing, my friends this is not journalism this is illegal and needs to stop.

The FCC needs to conduct an investigation into this organization to find out what they know about this event because as they stated on national TV they may have knowledge about these events, why is that?

Simply because if they have no knowledge about this event then they need to apologize to the American People and those families that lost loved ones and those Americans that lost legs and arms, and will be forever a victim of the second attack in 12 years.

It is time that the media stop trying to use tragedies like this for political gain.

 

 

 

 

 


NBC Town hall She-bate

The Town hall question and answer session, which was allegedly mishandled, in a number of ways, brings about a serious problem in the question of what a debate actually is and why do we have situations where moderators support one candidate over another.

That is a serious problem of bias it is not a question at all it is a problem.

The real question is will advertisers continue to support bias in the media…

 (source)

If Tuesday night’s presidential debate proved nothing else, it demonstrated one thing: CNN’s Candy Crowley is definitely not an “uncommitted voter.” The moderator’s handling of the town-hall debate at Hofstra University was heavy-handed and one-sided throughout, not merely giving more time to President Obama, but repeatedly cutting off Mitt Romney when the Republican attempted to counter accusations from the president.

Reports surfaced days before the Townhall style so called debate that the moderator might detour from the path that both sides felt was less of a role, but many people now wonder what was going on, a moderator is neutral by nature not partisan by design.

What this suggests is media malfeasance.

When you look at the situation and the questions that were asked it is obvious that there were moments when the voters that were represented were not really undecided at all.

What was truly unfair to just about anyone that really matters is the Advertisers.

They supported this travesty of an insult to the intelligence of Americans all over the world.

They may have paid fees and then to have the entire process destroyed by this shrill of a woman, (allegedly)

 Amazing stuff here folks, but will it work are Americans really as stupid as the media appears to be, (allegedly, but what really is interesting here is how this even was so one sided. 

Source, The American Spectator.

At one point, after Obama had repeated his campaign accusation that Romney “said we should let Detroit go bankrupt,” Romney devoted part of his next reponse to rebutting the mischaracterization: “My plan was to have [auto companies] go through bankruptcy like 7-Eleven did and Macy’s and Continental Airlines and come out stronger. And I know he keeps saying, you want to take Detroit bankrupt. Well, the president took Detroit bankrupt. You took General Motors bankrupt. You took Chrysler bankrupt. So when you say that I wanted to take the auto industry bankrupt, you actually did.” The process of bankruptcy was necessary, Romney said, “to get those companies back on their feet, so they could start hiring more people. That was precisely what I recommended and ultimately what happened.”


The court of public opinion

First there was the Duke Case, then several other cases where charges were filed that should not have been filed.

So what is up with this nonsense.

Are we watching the end of the legal system in America, some say that eventually we might see all cases tried in the media, apparently with this casey anthony case, everything has changed, with video and even orange country sherrifs, documents, (that allegedly should not be public or published publically) this has changed everything.

When you look at this situation, it has not been a "normal" trial, (naturally because the state is trying to get the death panalty, in a case in which there is really no "real" evidence that a murder even took place.

That is a serious problem more so if your living in Florida, because there is a tendency to over charge any situation, they have this alleged system where they charge you far in excess of the crime, in hopes of influenceing the outcome of the accusation.

Is that justice? or is it extortion?

Think about it if you are unfortunate enough to live in florida and you Jwalk you allegedly might be charged with a felony.

If you break the law you might be charged with any crime  at all, say you run over a dog, in the street, the way it looks allegedly you might be charged with wreckless homicide of a dog, in florida, you might get convicted, and spend the rest of your life in jail, sounds crazy right, but apparently no proof is required these days.

So all you snow birds, you might think twice about vacationing in Florida in the future, because the justice system in Florida allegedly is really screwed up.

When you think about how messed up this entire trial has been.

Can anyone have a fair trial any more, with the way that allegedly the state of Florida has decided to try this case allegedly in the court of public opinion and the media foaming at the mouth, with greedy innuendo and injustice. 

You see comments online that are really scary, when you examine them and you have to wonder have we lost all common sense in this situation here and is the state of Florida responsible for this circus of a trial where TV cameras are allowed in the court room of a death case, this changes everything, who can get a fair trial under these circumstances at all?

Think about it, you have allegedly the orange county sheriffs office allegedly leaking documents that you can find all over the internet, you have YouTube videos all over the internet. 

When you think about all the strange evidence that has been allowed into this court case you have to wonder about the judges motivations, when allowing certain very questionable evidence into this death case. 

Is this girl guilty?

Yes, she is guilty as a mother that failed to protect her daughter from death. 

As a mother that failed to protect her child.

As a mother that failed the father of the child.

As an ignorant girl that dated different men and morally
allowed for a terrible home life for this child.

She is guilty of all of those things and more, but and here is really what is important.

Did she plan to murder her child?

Did she have help?

Did she intentionally do all that she is accused of doing?

I think the answer allegedly has to be no.

Is she guilty and is she responsible yes, certainly and she should be made to pay for that failure.

however, there is no evidence that a murder has taken place.

Sorry, the state of Florida has allegedly and typically over done this case, so watch out, if you date to venture into the state of Florida, you might double park and get charged with a felony.

You might get a parking ticket and be charged with the death penalty.