Categories
Politics

liberal fox news comentators, suggest that only ohio matters?

This morning a certain blond fox news commentator, (bobble head) made the suggestion that only Ohio matters in regard to the presidential election, how stupid is that?  So, what should we do cancel the elections for all the other states?

Is it reasonable to believe that only one state matters in an election?

The ignorant idea that a republican cannot win an election without winning Ohio is not only ignorant but stupid.

Think of it this way, if a democrat can win without Ohio, then logically it makes sense that a republican can do so too.  This is the worst kind of flagrant political voter intimidation it is wrong and has no place on the News. Fox needs to get some better producers because whom ever is in charge is doing a terrible job of it. 

This is the kind of ignorant thinking that got us into the high debt and low employment that we face as a nation, this is the kind of stupidity that makes journalists, look dumb and dumber.

You have to just wonder what they are thinking, but you really know that already they think were stupid, too ignorant and unlearned to figure out what they are saying is not only a lie but a stupid lie.

At least have the backbone to admit that your a liberal and that your biased, that your opinions are just that an opinion not based on fact but based on your personal beliefs, because when you try to influence public opinion with stupidity you only make yourself look more ignorant than the very people you hope to influence.

If as the liberal fox news show this morning suggests, the only state that matters is Ohio, how far from a dictatorship is America, that is the silly kind of foolishness that these people are focused on and that is why they are incapable of understanding just how ignorant they look to the rest of the world.

Shame on you, this is a stain on the journalistic excellence that should be Fox.

You are transparent and we know you for who and what you are, You are fooling no one and your influence is negligible.

 

Categories
Politics

The court of public opinion

First there was the Duke Case, then several other cases where charges were filed that should not have been filed.

So what is up with this nonsense.

Are we watching the end of the legal system in America, some say that eventually we might see all cases tried in the media, apparently with this casey anthony case, everything has changed, with video and even orange country sherrifs, documents, (that allegedly should not be public or published publically) this has changed everything.

When you look at this situation, it has not been a "normal" trial, (naturally because the state is trying to get the death panalty, in a case in which there is really no "real" evidence that a murder even took place.

That is a serious problem more so if your living in Florida, because there is a tendency to over charge any situation, they have this alleged system where they charge you far in excess of the crime, in hopes of influenceing the outcome of the accusation.

Is that justice? or is it extortion?

Think about it if you are unfortunate enough to live in florida and you Jwalk you allegedly might be charged with a felony.

If you break the law you might be charged with any crime  at all, say you run over a dog, in the street, the way it looks allegedly you might be charged with wreckless homicide of a dog, in florida, you might get convicted, and spend the rest of your life in jail, sounds crazy right, but apparently no proof is required these days.

So all you snow birds, you might think twice about vacationing in Florida in the future, because the justice system in Florida allegedly is really screwed up.

When you think about how messed up this entire trial has been.

Can anyone have a fair trial any more, with the way that allegedly the state of Florida has decided to try this case allegedly in the court of public opinion and the media foaming at the mouth, with greedy innuendo and injustice. 

You see comments online that are really scary, when you examine them and you have to wonder have we lost all common sense in this situation here and is the state of Florida responsible for this circus of a trial where TV cameras are allowed in the court room of a death case, this changes everything, who can get a fair trial under these circumstances at all?

Think about it, you have allegedly the orange county sheriffs office allegedly leaking documents that you can find all over the internet, you have YouTube videos all over the internet. 

When you think about all the strange evidence that has been allowed into this court case you have to wonder about the judges motivations, when allowing certain very questionable evidence into this death case. 

Is this girl guilty?

Yes, she is guilty as a mother that failed to protect her daughter from death. 

As a mother that failed to protect her child.

As a mother that failed the father of the child.

As an ignorant girl that dated different men and morally
allowed for a terrible home life for this child.

She is guilty of all of those things and more, but and here is really what is important.

Did she plan to murder her child?

Did she have help?

Did she intentionally do all that she is accused of doing?

I think the answer allegedly has to be no.

Is she guilty and is she responsible yes, certainly and she should be made to pay for that failure.

however, there is no evidence that a murder has taken place.

Sorry, the state of Florida has allegedly and typically over done this case, so watch out, if you date to venture into the state of Florida, you might double park and get charged with a felony.

You might get a parking ticket and be charged with the death penalty.  

 

 

Categories
Politics

Can Casey Anthony get a fair trial?

Guilty as charged, that is what we will see, and why is that you may ask?

Why wait, for a verdict, everyone knows that she is guilty, right?

Everyone knows it because the media has told us for days, that they "think" she is guilty.

Simple, this case was tried in the court of public opinion and it was tried in the media.

But ask your self one thing, if Casey Anthony is so stupid, and such a monster, how did she manage to leave no evidence behind?

There are a lot of implications in the idea that this trial has been for the most part played out in the media.

When you have personal opinion presented as fact, can anyone have a fair trial is this the end of the justice system as we know it. 

There are indications allegedly that the judge may not be fair minded in his approach to adjudicating, this case allegedly he has sided with the prosecuting agency in allegedly 98 percent of the objections.   Even in stupid cases, the average is 78 percent allegedly.

That is a difference of 20 percent allegedly give or take a percentage point or two, the thing that is really amazing here is that you have what appears to be bias from allegedly the judge in this case, so what is up with that, if it is true can this young lady (I know some people think that she is guilty and should be tired and executed in the press)

The thing is should a media company have only one point of view?

Can this girl get a fair trial, when the media is constantly and allegedly presenting only a biased point of view can she get a fair trial, just curious because it looks like everyone in the world is convinced, that this girl murdered her own child and there is no proof, period, nothing the prosecution has presented is real allegedly they can prove nothing about her actual connection to this tragedy, now, is this woman morally responsible for her child, (Yes certainly) and she should be punished, but without proof can we begin to start putting people to death?

Should the media only present one side of an issue, considering that this is a life and death care, should the media be allegedly biased?

That is something that is serious and it is something that people should seriously consider.