Categories
2016 election 2016 vote them out Politics

New York grand jury

Protesters have been protesting the facts but they do not have the truth.

What they have is what the media have published.

That is not the truth.

You see there is a serious problem with the justice system in this nation and it is the propensity to over charge alleged crime.

We have seen this many times over the last few years.

Hundreds of times actually, what they are doing is to charge a crime at the maximum, if someone is remotely involved in a crime where someone dies, they are charged with first degree murder and they ask for the maximum, a death sentence.

The problem with this strategy is that it no longer works.

Categories
Politics

Zimmerman facts influenced by the Media?

How the media might be influencing the news and creating political problems, will NBC do something very wrong?

What do we do about this out of control media.

 When the media attempts to alter facts that directly effect the opinion of the viewing public it becomes impossible for the justice system to do its job, why is the media attempting to create problems for justice in America? 

Is it possible that the Media would like to become the new justice system?

They may actually think that they can do it better, but the truth is the media is corrupt…

Categories
Politics

Twitter used in effor to influence zimmerman trial

What will happen to the Justice System, will it survive this trial, will the media do what they want to do no matter what you think…

 Is this a real video or is it not a real factual video?

Categories
Politics

bill orielly spin?

Apparently, Bill orielly is not happy about the way that the Casey Anthony trial went.

that the State of Florida failed to prove in the Casey Anthony Death and Murder trial.

Why is that?

Is Bill a pinhead?

I have to ask because it almost seems as if he is obsessed about this issue, and no one denies that the child deserved justice however the fact is that there was no evidence to support a death panel, period.

What Bill orielly seems to have ignored is that in this nation we do not try cases in the press.

This is why we have a court system because the media is hardly ever correct in its assumptions.

So Bill stop being a pin head and get the facts before you go off half cocked and wild as a bear.

The state failed to prove its case, had they correctly charged the case as an accidental manslaughter case, the girl would have got 12 to 17 years behind bars, as it was the state of Florida, went for the gold and failed to prove murder or aggravated, manslaughter, period.

We have a justice system that works fine when everyone plays by the rules, in this case the state of Florida did not play by the rules.

They paid for that failure, but you cannot spin it the way you are without appearing to be a pin head yourself.

You should carefully consider your demeanor and your candor because if harm comes to Casey Anthony and they say that Bill orielly told me to kill her, you sir will have spun a web of deceit that causes a murder to take place and if that happens you should face the same justice that you are so eager to dispense to everyone except for your own self.

You sir have a responsibility to follow the law just like everyone else you are not above the law and your spin is not good for America.

Time to let it rest, nothing you say is going to make any difference at this point, the only thing you may do is cause some mentally unbalanced person to go after this girl when she is released, you should hope that does not happen due to your spinning, of the facts of this case.

The fact again, is that the state failed to prove murder, that is just so easy to understand here, it is not insane as you suggest, it is reasonable and the jury did its job, had the state charged this case correctly you would have nothing to talk about.

But the state of Florida did not do the right thing here they wanted what they could not prove.

The truth here is something that we may never fully realize, and speculating about what you "think" is true is not helpful nor is it right morally or ethically, it is not right what your doing is wrong, and you sir should be going to mass this Sunday to deal with this issue because your not going to be able to dispense the justice you so wish to see.

It is not your responsibility to do that and it is not your job, you always say the spin stops here, but you know what, your spining  and that is just the way it is, you are projecting your feelings, and not looking at this in an intellicutual way at all.

If we convict everyone in the press you know what happens?

In his final hours on death row, Cameron Todd Willingham and his attorneys tried frantically to show the governor of Texas a new scientific report proving his innocence. The evidence was apparently ignored, and Willingham was executed on February 17, 2004.

During his trial, he refused prosecutors' offer to give him life in prison instead of the death penalty. He told them he was innocent, and he wouldn't agree to any deals. As he was strapped down in the execution chamber, just before the lethal injection began, he proclaimed his innocence one last time.

An extraordinary new investigative report in the New Yorker shows that Willingham was telling the truth. He was innocent. David Grann's report, in the September 7 issue, exhaustively deconstructs every aspect of the case and shows that none of the evidence used to convict Willingham was valid. Since the reinstatement of capital punishment in 1974, Grann's report constitutes the strongest case on record in this country that an innocent man was executed.

But you know what everyone was as sure as you are right now that this man was guilty, just as you are so sure, about this case, others were just as sure as you are now, yet, they were wrong, and a man lost his life, due to the bias of the media and its ignorance.

Dont be so sure about things, becuase you never know when you might just be wrong about the entire thing, when you are a media figure and something you say causes harm to someone, that is something you cannot take back.

There are also other cases where innocent men and women were pronounced guilty by the court of public opionion, they were wrong and you might be wrong too, your unwillingness to consider that fact, is a problem I hope you get the help you need sir.

 

Categories
Politics

The court of public opinion

First there was the Duke Case, then several other cases where charges were filed that should not have been filed.

So what is up with this nonsense.

Are we watching the end of the legal system in America, some say that eventually we might see all cases tried in the media, apparently with this casey anthony case, everything has changed, with video and even orange country sherrifs, documents, (that allegedly should not be public or published publically) this has changed everything.

When you look at this situation, it has not been a "normal" trial, (naturally because the state is trying to get the death panalty, in a case in which there is really no "real" evidence that a murder even took place.

That is a serious problem more so if your living in Florida, because there is a tendency to over charge any situation, they have this alleged system where they charge you far in excess of the crime, in hopes of influenceing the outcome of the accusation.

Is that justice? or is it extortion?

Think about it if you are unfortunate enough to live in florida and you Jwalk you allegedly might be charged with a felony.

If you break the law you might be charged with any crime  at all, say you run over a dog, in the street, the way it looks allegedly you might be charged with wreckless homicide of a dog, in florida, you might get convicted, and spend the rest of your life in jail, sounds crazy right, but apparently no proof is required these days.

So all you snow birds, you might think twice about vacationing in Florida in the future, because the justice system in Florida allegedly is really screwed up.

When you think about how messed up this entire trial has been.

Can anyone have a fair trial any more, with the way that allegedly the state of Florida has decided to try this case allegedly in the court of public opinion and the media foaming at the mouth, with greedy innuendo and injustice. 

You see comments online that are really scary, when you examine them and you have to wonder have we lost all common sense in this situation here and is the state of Florida responsible for this circus of a trial where TV cameras are allowed in the court room of a death case, this changes everything, who can get a fair trial under these circumstances at all?

Think about it, you have allegedly the orange county sheriffs office allegedly leaking documents that you can find all over the internet, you have YouTube videos all over the internet. 

When you think about all the strange evidence that has been allowed into this court case you have to wonder about the judges motivations, when allowing certain very questionable evidence into this death case. 

Is this girl guilty?

Yes, she is guilty as a mother that failed to protect her daughter from death. 

As a mother that failed to protect her child.

As a mother that failed the father of the child.

As an ignorant girl that dated different men and morally
allowed for a terrible home life for this child.

She is guilty of all of those things and more, but and here is really what is important.

Did she plan to murder her child?

Did she have help?

Did she intentionally do all that she is accused of doing?

I think the answer allegedly has to be no.

Is she guilty and is she responsible yes, certainly and she should be made to pay for that failure.

however, there is no evidence that a murder has taken place.

Sorry, the state of Florida has allegedly and typically over done this case, so watch out, if you date to venture into the state of Florida, you might double park and get charged with a felony.

You might get a parking ticket and be charged with the death penalty.  

 

 

Categories
Politics

Anthony Not Guilty…

Update

Prosecuting attorney Jess Ashton retires or allegedly is fired, who knows one thing for sure this business of over charging cases is not the way that the justice system should be run, the idea that you over charge a case in order to get what you want regardless of the facts or the evidence was a message that was transmitted loud and clear by the jury.

This has been a demonstration of a huge dog and pony show, that many feel was unwarranted and was not right that the state of Florida went after this girl in the press and they allegedly cut corners.

Capitol Murder  

Not Guilty

Aggravated Manslaughter, 

Not Guilty.

Aggravated Child abuse

Not Guilty.

Lying to police

Guilty.

 

This was a waste of the Tax payers money and the District Attorney should be fired.

Categories
Politics

George anthony Skum

Who was more capable of hiding evidence a veteran policeman or a 25 year old party girl?

 

Since the media appear to be so one sided in the presentation of this case, I was interested in watching some of the trial coverage, simply because what I am seeing and what the media is reporting are two different things.

Is George Anthony a skum bucket, is there some kind of issue here that we have a problem in this trial?

George Anthony may have allegedly worked as an undercover agent?

Was George an undercover agent and is the state of Florida allegedly trying to bend the rules of evidence by doing this?

What is going on here is the State of Florida wrong?

Is the state of florida a problem?   When you look at what they are doing, is the state of florida, causing the justice system a serious problem?

Should this case be thrown out ? 

Can Casey Anthony get a fair trial?

Amazing stuff here, apparently there are some issues, that you see this kind of thing over and over again. 

The persecution  opps, prosecution, keeps objecting over and over and over again, is it possible for this girl to get a fair trial when the state, objects to every other question allegedly over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over, again over and over again, amazing stuff, 

Just watching this guy on the stand, the guy is an alleged, liar. 

I have seen a lot of liars, and this guy allegedly is a liar. over and over and over and over again. 

So really when you look at this guy, what is the first thing that you think about?

That is the real question, when you look at this guy and you see him refuse to answer questions on the stand, you have to consider the possibility that the guy is not being honest. 

The number one thing that makes me wonder about this guy is the real fact that he attempted suicide, that is the one biggest question that you have to ask yourself. 
Why did this guy try to commit suicide. 
 

Categories
Politics

Can Casey Anthony get a fair trial?

Guilty as charged, that is what we will see, and why is that you may ask?

Why wait, for a verdict, everyone knows that she is guilty, right?

Everyone knows it because the media has told us for days, that they "think" she is guilty.

Simple, this case was tried in the court of public opinion and it was tried in the media.

But ask your self one thing, if Casey Anthony is so stupid, and such a monster, how did she manage to leave no evidence behind?

There are a lot of implications in the idea that this trial has been for the most part played out in the media.

When you have personal opinion presented as fact, can anyone have a fair trial is this the end of the justice system as we know it. 

There are indications allegedly that the judge may not be fair minded in his approach to adjudicating, this case allegedly he has sided with the prosecuting agency in allegedly 98 percent of the objections.   Even in stupid cases, the average is 78 percent allegedly.

That is a difference of 20 percent allegedly give or take a percentage point or two, the thing that is really amazing here is that you have what appears to be bias from allegedly the judge in this case, so what is up with that, if it is true can this young lady (I know some people think that she is guilty and should be tired and executed in the press)

The thing is should a media company have only one point of view?

Can this girl get a fair trial, when the media is constantly and allegedly presenting only a biased point of view can she get a fair trial, just curious because it looks like everyone in the world is convinced, that this girl murdered her own child and there is no proof, period, nothing the prosecution has presented is real allegedly they can prove nothing about her actual connection to this tragedy, now, is this woman morally responsible for her child, (Yes certainly) and she should be punished, but without proof can we begin to start putting people to death?

Should the media only present one side of an issue, considering that this is a life and death care, should the media be allegedly biased?

That is something that is serious and it is something that people should seriously consider.

Categories
Aarp Politics

Is Casee innocent or guilty or just stupid?

Can Casee get a fair trial in Flordia

Is the legal System Broken?

When the people cannot prove a case should they not work for proper punishment?

Most people think that Casee Anthony is Guilty, some think that she should be beaten and put to death.

Still others suggest that she should be given mental health treatments, perhaps even going so far as to say that she should never be allowed to have a child again?

Wait, are you serious, do some people living in Florida think that this girl should be sterilized so this never happens again?

When the media portrays a situation which might have been an accident as if the girl is a monster, to get advertisers for their new stations, is that not a conflict of interest in news reporting?

What is the real issue here, a small beautiful child lost her life, due to her mothers alleged stupidity and or willful neglect, is that actual or is that just the state of Florida, doing every thing they can to make sure that someone “anyone” is held responsible, that someone pays, and is held to an impossible standard, you have to wonder, because you look at a forensic, scientist, (if you can really call them that at all) and if all they have is one or two hairs, that may have come from the child, but they may or may not have been alive, or dead, wait, are you confused yet?

You should be because what we are seeing here is a media circus, and perhaps we are seeing a miscarriage of justice, what if, for a moment, what if, the media were not involved in this case at all.

What if there were no TV cameras, allowed…

Stupid is as stupid does…

What if, the state of Florida had to actually prove its allegations, beyond a reasonable doubt…

Think about that for a moment, how often do we allow what should have been private conversations between parent and child to be broadcast on the evening news…

Makes you wonder about the state of the justice system in the Great state of Florida.

I can tell you one thing, this case was badly handled, (allegedly) from the start.

There continue to be an absence of relevant information presented at this trial, or so it would seem, because all we are seeing of it is this admittedly very thin evidence, (if you can even call it that) there is very little evidence tying this girl to a dead body having been in the truck of back of a vehicle.

One thing that I find incredible here is that we have a girl that is obviously not the brightest tool in the shed, here and the best that the State of Florida can present to attempt and tie this girl to the death of this child is very (allegedly) weak testimony from some science geek that cannot really as a matter of fact produce one piece of evidence that 100 percent ties this girl to a crime.

Is she stupid, you bet, not doubt about it…

Does she need mental help, again you bet, your beef cakes.

Was she smart enough to hide all the evidence so that it was never discovered, until all the evidence was gone, this I believe is an easy No, this girl was not that smart.

It would seem that if this girl was half as smart as the State of Florida would have you think that she is, we would not be listening to some geek sitting in a chair with very little “real” evidence that any crime was committed at all.

In a statement given allegedly by a third party, the use of the word advised, is used on several occasions, this apparently and allegedly was in some reports from the orange county sheriff, but do real people talk like that at all?

Or do LAW  ENFORCEMENT, individuals talk like this?

Do Law Enforcement officers, make statements, like subject advised me that, or this person advised me of this fact, this is just not accurate, real people in real life do not talk like this at all.