bill orielly spin?

Appar­ent­ly, Bill oriel­ly is not hap­py about the way that the Casey Antho­ny tri­al went.

that the State of Flori­da failed to prove in the Casey Antho­ny Death and Mur­der tri­al.

Why is that?

Is Bill a pin­head?

I have to ask because it almost seems as if he is obsessed about this issue, and no one denies that the child deserved jus­tice how­ev­er the fact is that there was no evi­dence to sup­port a death pan­el, peri­od.

What Bill oriel­ly seems to have ignored is that in this nation we do not try cas­es in the press.

This is why we have a court sys­tem because the media is hard­ly ever cor­rect in its assump­tions.

So Bill stop being a pin head and get the facts before you go off half cocked and wild as a bear.

The state failed to prove its case, had they cor­rect­ly charged the case as an acci­den­tal manslaugh­ter case, the girl would have got 12 to 17 years behind bars, as it was the state of Flori­da, went for the gold and failed to prove mur­der or aggra­vat­ed, manslaugh­ter, peri­od.

We have a jus­tice sys­tem that works fine when every­one plays by the rules, in this case the state of Flori­da did not play by the rules.

They paid for that fail­ure, but you can­not spin it the way you are with­out appear­ing to be a pin head your­self.

You should care­ful­ly con­sid­er your demeanor and your can­dor because if harm comes to Casey Antho­ny and they say that Bill oriel­ly told me to kill her, you sir will have spun a web of deceit that caus­es a mur­der to take place and if that hap­pens you should face the same jus­tice that you are so eager to dis­pense to every­one except for your own self.

You sir have a respon­si­bil­i­ty to fol­low the law just like every­one else you are not above the law and your spin is not good for Amer­i­ca.

Time to let it rest, noth­ing you say is going to make any dif­fer­ence at this point, the only thing you may do is cause some men­tal­ly unbal­anced per­son to go after this girl when she is released, you should hope that does not hap­pen due to your spin­ning, of the facts of this case.

The fact again, is that the state failed to prove mur­der, that is just so easy to under­stand here, it is not insane as you sug­gest, it is rea­son­able and the jury did its job, had the state charged this case cor­rect­ly you would have noth­ing to talk about.

But the state of Flori­da did not do the right thing here they want­ed what they could not prove.

The truth here is some­thing that we may nev­er ful­ly real­ize, and spec­u­lat­ing about what you “think” is true is not help­ful nor is it right moral­ly or eth­i­cal­ly, it is not right what your doing is wrong, and you sir should be going to mass this Sun­day to deal with this issue because your not going to be able to dis­pense the jus­tice you so wish to see.

It is not your respon­si­bil­i­ty to do that and it is not your job, you always say the spin stops here, but you know what, your spin­ing  and that is just the way it is, you are pro­ject­ing your feel­ings, and not look­ing at this in an intel­li­cu­tu­al way at all.

If we con­vict every­one in the press you know what hap­pens?

In his final hours on death row, Cameron Todd Will­ing­ham and his attor­neys tried fran­ti­cal­ly to show the gov­er­nor of Texas a new sci­en­tif­ic report prov­ing his inno­cence. The evi­dence was appar­ent­ly ignored, and Will­ing­ham was exe­cut­ed on Feb­ru­ary 17, 2004.

Dur­ing his tri­al, he refused pros­e­cu­tors’ offer to give him life in prison instead of the death penal­ty. He told them he was inno­cent, and he would­n’t agree to any deals. As he was strapped down in the exe­cu­tion cham­ber, just before the lethal injec­tion began, he pro­claimed his inno­cence one last time.

An extra­or­di­nary new inves­tiga­tive report in the New York­er shows that Will­ing­ham was telling the truth. He was inno­cent. David Grann’s report, in the Sep­tem­ber 7 issue, exhaus­tive­ly decon­structs every aspect of the case and shows that none of the evi­dence used to con­vict Will­ing­ham was valid. Since the rein­state­ment of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in 1974, Grann’s report con­sti­tutes the strongest case on record in this coun­try that an inno­cent man was exe­cut­ed.

But you know what every­one was as sure as you are right now that this man was guilty, just as you are so sure, about this case, oth­ers were just as sure as you are now, yet, they were wrong, and a man lost his life, due to the bias of the media and its igno­rance.

Dont be so sure about things, becuase you nev­er know when you might just be wrong about the entire thing, when you are a media fig­ure and some­thing you say caus­es harm to some­one, that is some­thing you can­not take back.

There are also oth­er cas­es where inno­cent men and women were pro­nounced guilty by the court of pub­lic opi­o­nion, they were wrong and you might be wrong too, your unwill­ing­ness to con­sid­er that fact, is a prob­lem I hope you get the help you need sir.