What if?

What if we are all wrong?

What if every one is wrong and Pres­i­dent Oba­ma is right?

When you think about it, what if the White House is right and every­one else in the world is wrong?

The econ­o­my is a big thing, just imag­ine if the Mis­sis­sip­pi riv­er rep­re­sent­ed the econ­o­my of the Unit­ed States, if you want­ed to fun­da­men­tal­ly change the direc­tion and the flow of the Econ­o­my when it has run in one direc­tion for many many years, how long would it take to see a change?

One year, Two years, Three years.

More…

The Pres­i­dent only has four years to make a dif­fer­ence, but the thing here is does the Econ­o­my have that long to recov­er or to change in any rea­son­able way at all.  Alleged­ly about 82 per­cent of the vot­ing pub­lic in the US is against the cur­rent direc­tion of the eco­nom­ic issues that the US faces.

How would we know if every­one were wrong but only a few were right, look­ing at the fig­ures, if one out of one mil­lion were right and the 999,000 were wrong how would you ever know it? Because we live in a democ­ra­cy, at least we tell our­selves that is what we live and what we believe in, in the past it has been proven that the major­i­ty were wrong, but it is usu­al­ly sta­tis­ti­cal­ly not sig­nif­i­cant.

The world is not like­ly to end if mil­lions are wrong, and the one is right.

We know by study­ing his­to­ry that we can antic­i­pate human behav­ior, even log­i­cal­ly pre­dict it, how­ev­er over time, we know that when we see cer­tain signs of eco­nom­ic growth we can antic­i­pate pros­per­i­ty in a mean­ing­ful way.

 We are three years, into this plan, and we could see some action over the next few months the thing is this is it cor­rect?

One thing for sure, if we are indeed not going in the right direc­tion do we have yet anoth­er, chance to get it right or is this the last chance?

 If this is our last chance to make it right, should we not be cer­tain that we are doing the right thing for every­one not just a few.

Last night, Emo­tion seemed to be the main thing, Michele Bach­mann talked emo­tion­al­ly about a sub­ject that on the sur­face seemed to be of inter­est how­ev­er, was it real­ly that inter­est­ing, and was it accu­rate, con­sid­er­ing that no one is forced to do some­thing against their will, (opt out pro­vi­sions are always pro­vid­ed)

Can we real­ly rely on a woman that does not dis­tin­guish between the facts and the real­i­ty of any giv­en sit­u­a­tion, just for dra­ma?

I found sev­er­al things some­what dis­turb­ing, last night, Ron Paul, seemed to be of the idea that some­one should be allowed to die if they choose to have no insur­ance cov­er­age, that was a real issue and it is a scary thing, more so if you hap­pen to be the one that is in need of health cov­er­age and you don’t have it.

I know some­one right now that is sick and can­not get treat­ment, because she is not sick enough.

Imag­ine that, we have to wait until she is so sick that her life is threat­ened, until she might pos­si­bly die.

Then she can get some help, but if it involves can­cer, and that is the like­ly result here, then ear­ly detec­tion and treat­ment, can increase suc­cess rates, by 70 per­cent or more, sur­vival rates are also much high­er for ear­ly detec­tion.