Categories
Politics

biased CNN debate tonight

Well time for CNN to have yet allegedly another biased news media event
where  they may be likely to ask questions that are unfair and biased in
nature.

You just have to wonder in part why put up with a news company that
is not really a news company at all?

You have to wonder when you see these questions from these liberals.

They ask questions based on emotion, not fact, they ask questions that
they do not want to answer if the shoe were on the other foot they would
say that it was racist to ask questions like that.

They will say all kinds of things that make no sense at all.

They have an agenda, to try to make the debaters look bad and to attack each other.
They try to phrase a question where there is only one outcome to that question, the
answer they want to hear, and that may not be the truth at all.

It is a problem when the news is no longer the news.

In some ways there has been a call for some of these so called news companies that are
so far left or right for that matter that they should not be afforded the right to broadcast.

That is a little extreme, however if you have a news company that distorts the truth and
you have a news company that attempts to taint the news in its own image then that is
a real issue that perhaps we should discuss.

Cnn tonight will be doing the moderation, now to make it fair they should have at
least one moderator for each viewpoint, but that is not the way that they usually operate.
most of the time they are sneaky, (allegedly)

Most of the time they try to carefully word their questions where they can come up
with the now famous or infamous analogy of the “Gotcha” Question.

This does no one any good and it is also not news worthy.

In the old days this would have been considered unprofessional and it would have been
considered stupid. 

These days we have to put up with CNN or Do we?

Do we really have to put up with the biased and ugly (allegedly) coverage that CNN often
attempts to use words that are weighted to try and to create a certain impression when
one does not really exist.

They often say things that are not true, and then they try to hide that fact by using
confusing narratives, that can be misunderstood or even intentionally vague so that
they can then follow up with another “gotcha” question, while this might be entertainment for some of these liberals in the News media it is insulting to most clear thinking Americans.

So while some may think that watching a biased news company attempting to pursue
its own agenda at the expense of the public entertainment, we dont see it that way.

 

 

Categories
Politics

What if?

What if we are all wrong?

What if every one is wrong and President Obama is right?

When you think about it, what if the White House is right and everyone else in the world is wrong?

The economy is a big thing, just imagine if the Mississippi river represented the economy of the United States, if you wanted to fundamentally change the direction and the flow of the Economy when it has run in one direction for many many years, how long would it take to see a change?

One year, Two years, Three years.

More…

The President only has four years to make a difference, but the thing here is does the Economy have that long to recover or to change in any reasonable way at all.  Allegedly about 82 percent of the voting public in the US is against the current direction of the economic issues that the US faces.

How would we know if everyone were wrong but only a few were right, looking at the figures, if one out of one million were right and the 999,000 were wrong how would you ever know it? Because we live in a democracy, at least we tell ourselves that is what we live and what we believe in, in the past it has been proven that the majority were wrong, but it is usually statistically not significant.

The world is not likely to end if millions are wrong, and the one is right.

We know by studying history that we can anticipate human behavior, even logically predict it, however over time, we know that when we see certain signs of economic growth we can anticipate prosperity in a meaningful way.

 We are three years, into this plan, and we could see some action over the next few months the thing is this is it correct?

One thing for sure, if we are indeed not going in the right direction do we have yet another, chance to get it right or is this the last chance?

 If this is our last chance to make it right, should we not be certain that we are doing the right thing for everyone not just a few.

Last night, Emotion seemed to be the main thing, Michele Bachmann talked emotionally about a subject that on the surface seemed to be of interest however, was it really that interesting, and was it accurate, considering that no one is forced to do something against their will, (opt out provisions are always provided)

Can we really rely on a woman that does not distinguish between the facts and the reality of any given situation, just for drama?

I found several things somewhat disturbing, last night, Ron Paul, seemed to be of the idea that someone should be allowed to die if they choose to have no insurance coverage, that was a real issue and it is a scary thing, more so if you happen to be the one that is in need of health coverage and you don’t have it.

I know someone right now that is sick and cannot get treatment, because she is not sick enough.

Imagine that, we have to wait until she is so sick that her life is threatened, until she might possibly die.

Then she can get some help, but if it involves cancer, and that is the likely result here, then early detection and treatment, can increase success rates, by 70 percent or more, survival rates are also much higher for early detection.

 

 

 

Categories
apology mistake bad health care banks are stupid Barbara Wa Wa bill clinton for president

Chris Wallace biased?

Is Fox news really as fair as they Say they are?

In many ways it appears that history does in fact repeat, but why is that, when Fox news has been so successful, why would they now seek to emulate the failures of the old Giants, the ones that used to be big but are now taking a back seat to cable programming simple because of the sheer number of subscribers, cable is now larger than broadcast.

Is this True? allegedly, you can just watch the guy and see how he is sometimes, not very fair in the way he talks to people he interviews.

In this industry this is known as Bias, I am not afriad to say it here because I have seen it I have been a witnesses, and personally seen this on TV.

This is a terrible thing for a man to do to a woman, on national TV, this guy acts like an alleged, emo

Is fox news not really fair and balanced like they claim to be?

well you can read it yourself, and if you missed, it you really should see how biased the video appeared to be.

Wallace might have been smiling but his choice of words was not very nice, we noticed that he appeared to be batting for the left, in a network that advertises they are fair and balanced, we were puzzled about his choice of invective.

Yesterday I watched, Chris Wallace, interview Sarah Palin, and I noticed right away that his technique for interviewing her was not normal…

What I mean by that is that Fox news, “claims” to be Fair and Balanced, yet, the tone of the Wallace/Palin interview, was definitely from the left side of the equation, now it is really difficult to defend this, because I saw it, and it was not fair, nor was it balanced, it was obvious to me that the Interviewer, was adding and using adjectives, into the questions, which were laced, with emotion charged, invectives, now that is something that the left does all the time, in fact, in a recent opinion piece, seen on one of the other networks, the female lead, spewed, hatred, and bile, it was a real turn off, it was like watching a cat fight, where, each animal was hissing, and baring their teeth, it was in fact, very unprofessional, which is why they have such dismal ratings.

So why is Chris Wallace, stooping to the level of confirmed idiots?

I have to ask where do these people come off with this type of Unprofessional journalistic, ideas, when Chris Wallace, interviewed, now President Obama, he did ask some hard questions, in a soft ball way, but he was fair, he did not put any level of bias into it, I looked at the transcripts, for this interview and while the questions were difficult they were not biased.

So I have to ask, why did Wallace, treat Sarah Palin, the way he did?

It was not only disrespectful and biased, (in my opinion and allegedly) But it was Un professional, and something that I would expect to be watching on NBC, instead of Fox news, I would love to see the transcript on that on, and in fact, I will look for it, but I expect not to find it, because that interview, was not fair and balanced, and I would not blame Sarah Palin if she stopped doing interviews, on Fox, thanks, Chris.

You know Journalism has reached an all time low, when an interviewer cannot stop him or her self from peppering their questions with Bias, it is the main reason that Fox news has become so popular, the idea that people could get a fair coverage of a particular event, not total opinion, but hard news.

This was not hard news, but opinion and it was not only unfair, but it was unbalanced.

This may not come as a surprise to many however, it seems a little strange, to see this guy on TV, talking from a liberal view point, and you can argue all you want but the guy said some stuff to Sarah Palin in an interview, that just smacked of liberal politics.

We can see the polls indicate that liberal politics are on the decay, in fact ad revenue must certainly be falling, as fast as the ratings for NBC, (allegedly)