Chris Wallace biased?

Spread the love

Is Fox news real­ly as fair as they Say they are?

In many ways it appears that his­to­ry does in fact repeat, but why is that, when Fox news has been so suc­cess­ful, why would they now seek to emu­late the fail­ures of the old Giants, the ones that used to be big but are now tak­ing a back seat to cable pro­gram­ming sim­ple because of the sheer num­ber of sub­scribers, cable is now larg­er than broad­cast.

Is this True? alleged­ly, you can just watch the guy and see how he is some­times, not very fair in the way he talks to peo­ple he inter­views.

In this indus­try this is known as Bias, I am not afri­ad to say it here because I have seen it I have been a wit­ness­es, and per­son­al­ly seen this on TV.

This is a ter­ri­ble thing for a man to do to a woman, on nation­al TV, this guy acts like an alleged, emo

Is fox news not real­ly fair and bal­anced like they claim to be?

well you can read it your­self, and if you missed, it you real­ly should see how biased the video appeared to be.

Wal­lace might have been smil­ing but his choice of words was not very nice, we noticed that he appeared to be bat­ting for the left, in a net­work that adver­tis­es they are fair and bal­anced, we were puz­zled about his choice of invec­tive.

Yes­ter­day I watched, Chris Wal­lace, inter­view Sarah Palin, and I noticed right away that his tech­nique for inter­view­ing her was not nor­mal…

What I mean by that is that Fox news, “claims” to be Fair and Bal­anced, yet, the tone of the Wallace/Palin inter­view, was def­i­nite­ly from the left side of the equa­tion, now it is real­ly dif­fi­cult to defend this, because I saw it, and it was not fair, nor was it bal­anced, it was obvi­ous to me that the Inter­view­er, was adding and using adjec­tives, into the ques­tions, which were laced, with emo­tion charged, invec­tives, now that is some­thing that the left does all the time, in fact, in a recent opin­ion piece, seen on one of the oth­er net­works, the female lead, spewed, hatred, and bile, it was a real turn off, it was like watch­ing a cat fight, where, each ani­mal was hiss­ing, and bar­ing their teeth, it was in fact, very unpro­fes­sion­al, which is why they have such dis­mal rat­ings.

So why is Chris Wal­lace, stoop­ing to the lev­el of con­firmed idiots?

I have to ask where do these peo­ple come off with this type of Unpro­fes­sion­al jour­nal­is­tic, ideas, when Chris Wal­lace, inter­viewed, now Pres­i­dent Oba­ma, he did ask some hard ques­tions, in a soft ball way, but he was fair, he did not put any lev­el of bias into it, I looked at the tran­scripts, for this inter­view and while the ques­tions were dif­fi­cult they were not biased.

So I have to ask, why did Wal­lace, treat Sarah Palin, the way he did?

It was not only dis­re­spect­ful and biased, (in my opin­ion and alleged­ly) But it was Un pro­fes­sion­al, and some­thing that I would expect to be watch­ing on NBC, instead of Fox news, I would love to see the tran­script on that on, and in fact, I will look for it, but I expect not to find it, because that inter­view, was not fair and bal­anced, and I would not blame Sarah Palin if she stopped doing inter­views, on Fox, thanks, Chris.

You know Jour­nal­ism has reached an all time low, when an inter­view­er can­not stop him or her self from pep­per­ing their ques­tions with Bias, it is the main rea­son that Fox news has become so pop­u­lar, the idea that peo­ple could get a fair cov­er­age of a par­tic­u­lar event, not total opin­ion, but hard news.

This was not hard news, but opin­ion and it was not only unfair, but it was unbal­anced.

This may not come as a sur­prise to many how­ev­er, it seems a lit­tle strange, to see this guy on TV, talk­ing from a lib­er­al view point, and you can argue all you want but the guy said some stuff to Sarah Palin in an inter­view, that just smacked of lib­er­al pol­i­tics.

We can see the polls indi­cate that lib­er­al pol­i­tics are on the decay, in fact ad rev­enue must cer­tain­ly be falling, as fast as the rat­ings for NBC, (alleged­ly)