Fox news gets it wrong?

Is Fox news a prob­lem or are they just biased like all the oth­ers so called Jour­nal­is­tic media of the future?

The ques­tion is a valid one, is it fair and bal­anced or is it just a par­tic­u­lar view­point?

I sup­pose if not for Fox news there would be no real news at all (alleged­ly)

But where does the blame lie for these sins of omis­sion?

Pro­duc­tion?

Plan­ning?

Direc­tion?

So which is it, are the employment numbers up or down, or sideways?

Do peo­ple real­ly want to look up a girls skirt on nation­al TV, (Can I say the answer is NO)

Peo­ple, this HD is a great thing for movies, but I do not want to look up a wom­ans skirt on nation­al TV in the morn­ing before 9 AM.

In a morn­ing sto­ry on fox and friends they report­ed that there were 403 thou­sand new claims for un-employ­ment and that it was high­er than expect­ed, (there is some­one out there expect­ing more loss of jobs) think about that for a moment, today there are 403,000 more peo­ple out of work now that is just not good news in any way shape or form.

Then just a few min­utes ago we get this email from Fox busi­ness news.

The Labor Depart­ment reports ini­tial job­less claims fell last week by a less-than-expect­ed 13,000 to 403,000.

Ok can you see why Peo­ple just do not take the media seri­ous­ly?

Two dif­fer­ent shows on the Fox net­work report dif­fer­ent­ly on the same news sto­ry and nei­ther one got it right.

Yes, I know it is hard to believe, two dif­fer­ent view points, and they both got the sto­ry wrong, or per­haps it was inten­tion­al?

I just have to ask, what is up at fox news, are the pro­duc­ers alleged­ly incom­pe­tent?

In so many ways the real sto­ry here is that two years after the stim­u­lus plan, and TARP, and Bil­lions of alleged­ly Miss­ing Mon­ey, (some say as much as 230 Bil­lion dol­lars is miss­ing) that we have 403 thou­sand new first time claims, ok get that peo­ple, it is not good news, at all it is very bad news.

What is real­ly inter­est­ing about this sto­ry is the appar­ent lack of faith in the pub­lic’s abil­i­ty to think for them­selves.

Appar­ent­ly Fox news has joined the ranks of its Fel­lows that tend to think that every one but the pro­duc­ers and own­ers of Fox news are just plain too stu­pid to see through all the bull pucky they are shov­el­ing.

I heard this blond, come on nation­al TV and say per­haps its not as bad as every­one thinks it is?

Excuse me, but lit­tle miss Bar­bie pants, but do you have any idea what it is like in the real world?

When was the last time you drove your­self to work, in fact when was the last time you even had to put gas into a car, prob­a­bly a long time ago, because you like­ly don’t even have a car.

This is the kind of stuff that dri­ves view­ers crazy, and while we are at it, I know many peo­ple might want to see a scant­i­ly clad blond is a skirt that is far too short for TV audi­ences, but I sus­pect that at least half the audi­ence does not approve of the short short far too reveal­ing cam­era shots at Fox news in the morn­ing.

Just in case you pro­duc­ers do not real­ize it in HD there are times when you just dont want to see up a wom­ans skirt.

My God peo­ple get it togeth­er.