waterboarding led to location of Bin Laden

“A pris­on­er of war is a man who tries to kill you and fails, and then asks you not to kill him.”
Win­ston Churchill…

Bush once again proves that he was right all along even Pres­i­dent Oba­ma must agree he alleged­ly gave the order based on evi­dence obtained by water­board­ing, right?

In what is sure to be a dif­fi­cult psy­cho­log­i­cal choice the lib­er­als must now choose between what result­ed from the prac­tice of water board­ing which has been going on for a long time in fact US per­son­al in spe­cial ops train­ing have been going through this process for a long time now, which means that many of those that are cur­rent­ly in the ser­vice now have been water-board­ed in the past.

So to review water board­ing result­ed in the loca­tion of Bin laden which result­ed in an order from Wash­ing­ton which result­ed in what we now know hap­pened. Yet for the last two years this admin­is­tra­tion has done noth­ing but talk about the exact oppo­site of what we see they are now tak­ing cred­it for the actions of those in the past admin­is­tra­tions did that made this pos­si­ble.

If it were up to them, there would be no enhanced inter­ro­ga­tion and also known as water board­ing…

If it were up to them they would not have ever made this deci­sion so we have to give cred­it where cred­it is due, Pres­i­dent Oba­ma made the call and it was a good call, yet if it had not been for water board­ing they would nev­er have had this oppor­tu­ni­ty in the first place, so as the old say­ing goes you can­not have your cake and eat it too.

Either water board­ing is tor­ture or it is what led to final­ly get­ting Bin laden you cant have it both ways, either it is effec­tive or it is not effec­tive and from where we sit it is very effec­tive and we have to give cred­it to both pres­i­dents, Oba­ma for hav­ing the guts that alleged­ly Clin­ton did not have to make the call and Bush for hav­ing the guts to do what our own ene­mies have done for years.