In many ways the idea that Amer­i­ca is about to change in sig­nif­i­cant ways is some­thing that should dis­turb you great­ly.

We have a sit­u­a­tion where the word of one of the alleged rob­bers of a con­ve­nience store has been put out as truth.

We know that from the autop­sy dia­gram it is more than like­ly that there were no hands raised.

This is a big problem for the media.

They often get it wrong when they report on sit­u­a­tions where they have no direct knowl­edge or evi­dence.

There are two dif­fer­ent sto­ries about what hap­pened, much like the Trayvon Mar­tin Case, there are two very dif­fer­ent accounts of what hap­pened, the only dif­fer­ence here is that we know for a fact that there should be video from the patrol car.

If there is not video there there is going to be a huge prob­lem.

If they have video that clear­ly shows the account giv­en by the offi­cer, then the media are to blame and should pay for the dam­ages to busi­ness own­ers prop­er­ty.

Why not?

The Media like­ly report­ed and inflamed the sit­u­a­tion, they had no rea­son to believe that what they were report­ing was fact.

Yet they chose to do it any­way.

They tried to bend and twist the case into a sit­u­a­tion where strife would be the result between both blacks and whites.

The prob­lem here is that the only peo­ple that want to turn this into a race issue are the media and out side influ­ences, (accord­ing to reports most of those arrest­ed last night did not live in fer­gu­son.)

Now that is also a big problem.

N o mat­ter how you stack it, IF the offi­cer was attacked two times as is alleged, then this case is very dif­fer­ent they what the media por­trayed.

That is also a big prob­lem, it may be time to test the lit­i­ga­tion waters with a good sol­id case of media mis­rep­re­sen­ta­tion that result­ed in the loss of Mil­lions of dol­lars in insur­ance claims yet to be filed.

Think about that for a moment because the biggest issue that presents itself now is the lia­bil­i­ty of the press when it can be demon­strat­ed that pub­lish­ing inflam­ing infor­ma­tion could cre­ate a riot.

Should the press be held account­able for par­tic­i­pat­ing in biased report­ing when it fits the nar­ra­tive they want to push.

Now that is some­thing that should be inves­ti­gat­ed.

Somebody better investigate soon.

Because the media is cre­at­ing more prob­lems that it is solv­ing.

Its time for real report­ing and not this garbage that has been report­ed over the last ten years.

One thing that will tell the entire sto­ry is the video and audio that should have been record­ed by the police equip­ment installed in the car and you would think that being so close to a large metro area that cer­tain­ly there should be video and audio avail­able at some point.

The very fact that no one has even thought about this or pub­li­cized it is some­thing to also con­sid­er very care­ful­ly.

In a world where news trav­els so quick­ly is it not a wise thing to stop pub­lish­ing false nar­ra­tives that tend to cre­ate dra­ma?

They always say no dra­ma, but our media is guilty of cre­at­ing dra­ma and it is the kind of dra­ma that cre­ates great harm for those involved.

The truth is we do not know the truth yet.

The media needs to apol­o­gize to those peo­ple who have been affect­ed by this media mad­ness.

It may actu­al­ly be time to put a muz­zle on mad dogs that cre­ate noth­ing but prob­lems for every­one else.

Free­dom of the Press is ok, but this is not free­dom…

What this is does not resem­ble free­dom but anar­chy.

The press should take notice that the pub­lic are not igno­rant and unlearned we have the inter­net and we are not stu­pid.

We see and we under­stand what the media are all about and its time that they begin to under­stand that free­dom of the press is not a blank check.