The heart of an Evil man

 

When you begin to con­sid­er all the issues of where this nation is head­ed over the course of a short time it is clear that some­thing is hap­pen­ing that is not very good.

Sounds bad, like a book about a very bad man, in some ways it is some­thing that we have to look at as unpleas­ant as it might be to exam­ine what is hap­pen­ing in this nation, for every one lib­er­al there are thou­sands and thou­sands of Amer­i­cans.

We see these things and we won­der just what is hap­pen­ing, because with­out those peo­ple that “they” do not like “they” would not have a job at all, because if they do not make things that peo­ple buy then how can they sur­vive at all?

Think about that for a moment…

We have a sit­u­a­tion here where a very small per­cent­age of peo­ple are attempt­ing to (dic­tate) to the rest of Amer­i­ca how they should act, how they should eat, what they can do, how they can do it, how much mon­ey they can make, what kind of cars they can dri­ve, and what they can do when they dri­ve those cars, they seem to have this sort of odd thing in desir­ing to con­trol the lives of oth­ers. What is the hid­den agen­da here?

After Gabrielle Gif­ford­s’s shoot­ing, the Pres­i­dent told Amer­i­cans, “I do believe there is hope for civil­i­ty.” Just not in his par­ty. Yes­ter­day, Team­sters Pres­i­dent Jim­my Hof­fa tried to stir up the union crowd before the Pres­i­den­t’s Detroit speech by declar­ing war on Repub­li­cans. “Pres­i­dent Oba­ma, this is your army!” he thun­dered. “We are ready to march. Let’s take these sons of b****es out and give Amer­i­ca back to an Amer­i­ca where we belong.” Hof­fa, whom the White House chose to intro­duce the Pres­i­dent, unleashed his pro­fan­i­ty just min­utes before the com­man­der-in-chief took the stage.

Yet the admin­is­tra­tion, for all its talk of com­mon cour­tesy, seems to con­done the rhetoric. Asked to com­ment on Hof­fa’s tirade, the White House refused. Maybe they were too busy putting out the fires from Oba­ma’s sec­ond-in-com­mand. A few hun­dred miles away in Cincin­nati, Vice Pres­i­dent Joe Biden piled on his own slurs by call­ing Repub­li­cans the “bar­bar­ians at the gates.” (I sup­pose that’s an improve­ment over the “ter­ror­ist” label he slapped them with last month). Sure­ly this isn’t what the Pres­i­dent meant by talk­ing in a way “that heals, not… wounds?” Or is name-call­ing the new strat­e­gy for get­ting both sides to the table for some bipar­ti­san bud­get-mak­ing?

Lan­guage like Biden’s is not only coun­ter­pro­duc­tive, it’s demeaning–both to con­ser­v­a­tives and to the office of the Vice Pres­i­dent.

If Oba­ma wants to “tone down” the rhetoric, then he needs to apply the same stan­dards to his par­ty that it applies to every­one else. And con­sid­er­ing the insults Democ­rats have been hurl­ing, he has his work cut out for him. Just two weeks ago, anoth­er lib­er­al, Rep. Max­ine Waters (D‑Calif.), lit a fuse when she told a local com­mu­ni­ty sum­mit, “…

[A]s far as I’m con­cerned, the Tea Par­ty can go straight to h***!” The White House did­n’t renounce those com­ments either.

When it comes to tol­er­ance, it seems lib­er­als want to write the rules, but they cer­tain­ly don’t want to fol­low them.