The opposite of truth is this the liberal agenda?

Spread the love

Ok here we go again, I want to know why some lib­er­als seem bent on this path­way to lies…

Why do they do this?

How does it prof­it them, to ignore the truth and insist that a lie is the truth.

If I said the sky was blue a lib­er­al would come along and defend that the sky was green until they turned blue…

Just look at colms, the guy is not capa­ble of admit­ting when he is wrong…

He is the typ­i­cal lib­er­al, deny deny and lie lie, I just dont get it, is it because they can­not engage in a real con­ver­sa­tion?

So often we hear that you should nev­er talk about reli­gion or pol­i­tics, and for the most part that is held to be true, yet, over the last two years, we have had no choice but to speak up or be destroyed as a nation.

I can­not pre­tend to under­stand the lib­er­al agen­da, except that what ever they say the oppo­site is actu­al­ly true.

Now, that might seem a lit­tle scary and you would be right to think that, but it appears to be true, what ever a lib­er­al says the exact oppo­site is true, take the texas school board deci­sion, they say it was a biased deci­sion the truth is that the texas school board was act­ing to remove bias from school books.

So you can see that is a lib­er­al lie, it is odd for sure, how can some one say one thing when the truth is just the oppo­site,

Want anoth­er exam­ple, OK here you go…

Take the Ari­zona con­tro­ver­sy, the lib­er­als say that the law is bad for Amer­i­ca, but in fact it is good for Amer­i­ca, why is that, well in every sin­gle oth­er coun­try in the world, bor­der secu­ri­ty is strin­gent to the point of bul­lets and guns.

Yet, the lib­er­als want us to some­how believe that by tak­ing steps to defend the con­sti­tu­tion that states are some­how wrong, that my friends is a lie and not the truth.

In an alleged state­ment by the state depart­ment, it was alleged­ly report­ed that some­how we owed chi­na an apol­o­gy for Ari­zona, now that is just plain crazy even stu­pid, but we are expect­ed to believe that we owe a forign gov­ern­ment an apol­o­gy?

That is a Lie…   and

For what? do we owe an apol­o­gy?

Defend­ing our own bor­ders?

You know what, try cross­ing the bor­der to chi­na and see what hap­pens to you, it would not be a sus­prise to any­one that chi­na is very very tight about their bor­der and they have that right, I won­der what they think about these lib­er­als that go over there and apol­o­gize and tell their lib­er­al lies?

Do you think they respect those lib­er­als?

No, they actu­al­ly laugh at them because of how stu­pid they sound, you know sort of like some­one that has a per­son­al­i­ty dis­or­der and they just cant help being men­tal­ly chal­lenged, they tell lies because they can­not face the truth.

The truth being some­thing that appar­ent­ly lib­er­als can­not come to gripes, with like the loss of Kennedy for­mer sen­ate seat, and the now famous state­ment that it is the peo­ples seat, so you see yet anoth­er lib­er­al lie, the sen­ate seats do not belong to the sen­a­tors but to the peo­ple, now that is the truth.