Bill orielly Anger?

Spread the love

Bill is mad alleged­ly and bill is angry alleged­ly but could it all back­fire on him and his pop­u­lar­i­ty now that Glenn Beck is gone?

 

Bill oriel­ly Judge Jury and exe­cu­tion­er?

 

Bill is Angry why is that?

Last night on nation­al TV Bill con­tin­ued his pros­cu­tion, of Casey Antho­ny regard­less that those that sat in judge­ment of her aquit­ted her of the charge of mur­der, which was right, there was no evi­dence that mur­der ever took place beyond a rea­son­able doubt.

No cause of death proven or even known.

No clo­ro­form, found in trunk of car, (unproven elec­tron­ic “snif­fer” tech­nol­o­gy) does not count sor­ry bob­ble heads.

No DNA found, either in the car or at the crime scene, that matched Casey Antho­ny,

But was there some DNA found there, that matched no one in the Antho­ny Fam­i­ly?

This case was wrong to begin with now after weeks of trash talk­ing bob­ble heads like Bill oriel­ly can­not admit when they are wrong sim­ple as that.

There are two things were I take issue with Bills take on this entire boon dog­gle, that was and may still be the Casey Antho­ny Tri­al, and that was that there was no real evi­dence that any crime took place, yet, every­one Assumed, that there was some hor­ri­ble crime. 

They assumed that there was guilt because the media cov­ered the case in every pos­si­ble neg­a­tive light.

Every­thing about this case screamed that some acci­dent befell this child, not pur­pose­ful intent, but acci­dent, ter­ri­ble and hor­ri­ble result yes, and pun­ish­ment should be severe yes.

How­ev­er, the state had no proof that this woman was involved in this crime.

Yet, Bill is angry, why is that?   Because he was con­vinced, that the girl was guilty of a ter­ri­ble hor­ri­ble crime?

Because he was so opin­ion­at­ed that he could not con­ceive that the girl might not have actu­al­ly com­mit­ted a mur­der at all?

Is that why he is so angry?

You see I have a prob­lem with that sim­ply because the media has a respon­si­bil­i­ty, to pro­tect the pub­lic when they make state­ments like bill oriel­ly made last night you can be sure that sev­er­al men­tal­ly unsta­ble indi­vid­u­als heard that and may have decid­ed that they need to take the law into their own hands.

When you are a celebri­ty that is also a media fig­ure, you have a respon­si­bil­i­ty to pro­tect the pub­lic from spec­u­la­tion that may in fact be mis­placed, now what would hap­pen if lat­er this year Casey Antho­ny is released then is gunned down, by some men­tal­ly ill per­son and the first thing that comes out of their mouths is, Bill oriel­ly told me to do it.

Now we know that is not true that bill oriel­ly did not say those words, but to some­one that is men­tal­ly ill any­thing that a media fig­ure says might be tak­en the wrong way, and bill is not the only one either, there were many oth­ers Martha McCal­lum, used words like jus­tice, where is the jus­tice, (alleged­ly) and there were oth­er com­ments that could be con­sid­ered to be incen­di­ary, the fact is clear, here the state of Flori­da, made a mis­take in this case, one that Jess Ash­ton alleged­ly is pay­ing for with his job.

What if they passed a law where the fam­i­lies of those that were wrong­ful­ly accused, (charged with the wrong crime) that the state had to pay for the legal expens­es of the accused, would that not change this no holds barred charg­ing that the state of Flori­da seems to think is law­ful?

Alleged­ly in the state of Flori­da if you J walk they charge you will wreck­less dri­ving, sound com­i­cal but in this case it was accu­rate, they had a slam dunk case, but they want­ed what they could not prove, they want­ed death, but they could not prove it, because there was no real evi­dence.

Per­haps so, that may be some­thing that the legal pro­fes­sion should be push­ing for.

The fact remains that there was no evi­dence that con­nect­ed this girl with this crime, none at all and that in itself is trou­ble­some, sim­ply because in the world of foren­sics, it is very dif­fi­cult to not leave any evi­dence behind, that is not a nat­ur­al skill, it is a learned skill.

This girl did not plan this out, and if she was involved in this hor­ri­ble thing, she had help.

That is the facts, and if the state of Flori­da had just charged the case with acci­den­tal manslaugh­ter, or some oth­er equal­ly easy to live with charge, they could have got­ten a guilty across the board, win, but they did not do that they want­ed to take the life based on what?  Noth­ing, they had noth­ing at all, to tie this girl to this hor­ri­ble thing.

yet, the media is intent upon seek­ing jus­tice, that is wrong and must stop now.

The media needs to get over itself as judge jury and exe­cu­tion­er because that is not the func­tion of the media.

Bill Get over it, and think about what you are say­ing, because peo­ple lis­ten to you and no mat­ter how angry you might be, if some­one comes along and takes action on your words, you are respon­si­ble for what you say.