Categories
Politics

Bullets, Gun Control, Broken Congress.

There are so many reasons why Gun Control does not work, just look at all the large cities that have strict and probably unconstitutional gun control laws, these large cities have more Violent Crimes, More Murders and the weapon of choice? [kc_heading_pac_6_headline_1 size=”48″ color=”#cc0000″ ]Guns..[/kc_heading_pac_6_headline_1]

It took 92.5 million pounds of earth last year to cover the graves of America’s shooting victims – 619 tons for Oakland alone and 248 tons for San Francisco. While many of the murder weapons have been counted and traced, we will never know the tonnage of ammunition bought and used, and never know the buyers.

Notice how they played with the facts here, they talk about how many pounds of earth, but forgot to say that these cities have tough gun control laws…

What next, shall we regulate garden shears?

“At this time,” said ATF spokeswoman Ginger Colbrun, “unless there’s an executive order, ammunition is not regulated. There is no tracking system,” as there is for firearms. There is neither a record of purchase nor a background check, as there is for the gun itself (barring sales on Craigslist or at gun shows). There is no tagging system to trace the cartridges’ or slugs’ origins after a shooting, no tooling like a gun’s serial number.

Regulating Ammunition….

Really?  

That worked really well for Chicago last year and this year too, so really what is up with these people?

The truth is that there are not enough police, there are not enough private security firms, there are not even enough of our own national guard forces to protect all the people that live in this country.

I know that may sound a little scary, but it has been true since the beginning of time and your not going to change that at all.

In fact your never going to change that it has been that way because there are more people on this earth than there are responsible citizens, you cannot create enough laws to make someone who is evil good.

That is simply just not ever going to happen.

If you ever want to find yourself in a position of safety, take a course on how to use your weapons, because without that you could find your self in a position where you have protection but do not know how to safely use it.

Categories
Politics

Sheppard Smith Racist?

Is sheppard smith a racist?

In an interview on national TV, sheppard smith allegedly was rude and insensative, to a black man, but why did he act the way that he did was there some reason behind that behavior?  The story was about how invasive the department of family and children services, can be when they thought that a woman was using drugs during pregnancy.

However, at some point the woman was compelled to do a drug test and that in itself was the story yet Shep Smith seemed to not understand what the story was about. 

There is a consitutional issue here, a woman was forced to testify against her will, the test was faulty, as a result the state took her child away from her, and she lost something more valuable than you can imagine, time, they took 75 days away from this woman.

the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment applies to the states by
way of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The fifth amendment,
“nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be
deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;”

This woman was allegedly unfairly treated and allegedly was forced to testify against herself, that is a violation of the constitution.

But apparently that was not of interest to Shepard Smith, why was he allegedly acting so allegedly badly?

The story was that the Young lady was accused of doing drugs during pregnancy, because her child had a seizure now this begs the question, why was the mother automatically suspected of doing drugs, because allegedly it is not uncommon for a child to have a seizure, though it is a disturbing thing to see, it can happen and not be the result of any kind of drug use by the mother.

Sheppard Smith approached the story, being very skeptical, he called it “the poppy defence” but what probable cause actually existed at the time this woman was compelled to testify against herself?

Why did sheppard smith act the way he did toward the womans attorney?

Sheppard Smith asked a question that was unfair (allegedly) and it was a question that was impossible to answer.

He asked, was the woman still suspected of doing drugs?

Since he was asking her attorney, a question that only the state could answer, it was not possible for her attorney to answer what was in the mind or mentation of the DFCAS, so again, why did Sheppard Smith act so rudly, would he have treated a white attorney the same way as he treated the black man?  We may never know the answer to that question, but it is a problem because Fox news continues to generate news that is less than fair and less than ballanced, yet they claim to be fair and ballanced.

Fair and Ballanced, are more than just words, they are the pillars, of the foundation of our way of life.

Fairness, is what caused this nation to be born, Ballance, is what justice is all about but when you have a media company that bends the presentation of facts to suit what ever opinion they might have at the time, (allegedly) it can be a real issue because we need real news, not opinion, without fact, that can be had anywhere at any price.

I hope that fox news gets its collective act together soon because they are one side of a complex media puzzle, there is a problem with one sided coverage, and that may be why sometimes it may seem as if Fox news, goes a little over board on its coverage, (allegedly)

However, that is really not the entire story here.

 

 

 

 

Categories
Politics

Betrayed by speaker John Boehner

The rumor mill was in full force this morning when talk show host, Rush Limbaugh, broke news that John Boehner the speaker of the house would have a Special “deal” to pitch which would likely be a comprimise that would destroy the hopes of the republicians to regain the white house in 2012.

It is disturbing to see that we could be looking at the end of America as we know it today, which for some people is what they want, they have this idea that the rich are too rich and the poor are too poor, they might be right.

The problem is that this type of thinking has never proved profitable for the poor or the rich.

So will  John Boehner do the right thing and stand up for the American people or will he allegedly cry about how unfair it all is, the issue here is simple.

Will we turn from the brink of diaster, or will we embrace the failed economic agenda of the last three years?

The dollar is sitting on a wire, and what the speaker of the house does in the morning will determine what happens next.

Will we face the collaspe of the stock market?

Will the dollar drop to an all time low because the republicians are unfit for office?

Will we watch as millions of Americans have to beg for food because of the failed politics of the last three years.

Will we do the right thing or will we fail America?

 

Categories
Politics

Bill orielly Anger?

Bill is mad allegedly and bill is angry allegedly but could it all backfire on him and his popularity now that Glenn Beck is gone?

 

Bill orielly Judge Jury and executioner?

 

Bill is Angry why is that?

Last night on national TV Bill continued his proscution, of Casey Anthony regardless that those that sat in judgement of her aquitted her of the charge of murder, which was right, there was no evidence that murder ever took place beyond a reasonable doubt.

No cause of death proven or even known.

No cloroform, found in trunk of car, (unproven electronic "sniffer" technology) does not count sorry bobble heads.

No DNA found, either in the car or at the crime scene, that matched Casey Anthony,

But was there some DNA found there, that matched no one in the Anthony Family?

This case was wrong to begin with now after weeks of trash talking bobble heads like Bill orielly cannot admit when they are wrong simple as that.

There are two things were I take issue with Bills take on this entire boon doggle, that was and may still be the Casey Anthony Trial, and that was that there was no real evidence that any crime took place, yet, everyone Assumed, that there was some horrible crime. 

They assumed that there was guilt because the media covered the case in every possible negative light.

Everything about this case screamed that some accident befell this child, not purposeful intent, but accident, terrible and horrible result yes, and punishment should be severe yes.

However, the state had no proof that this woman was involved in this crime.

Yet, Bill is angry, why is that?   Because he was convinced, that the girl was guilty of a terrible horrible crime?

Because he was so opinionated that he could not conceive that the girl might not have actually committed a murder at all?

Is that why he is so angry?

You see I have a problem with that simply because the media has a responsibility, to protect the public when they make statements like bill orielly made last night you can be sure that several mentally unstable individuals heard that and may have decided that they need to take the law into their own hands.

When you are a celebrity that is also a media figure, you have a responsibility to protect the public from speculation that may in fact be misplaced, now what would happen if later this year Casey Anthony is released then is gunned down, by some mentally ill person and the first thing that comes out of their mouths is, Bill orielly told me to do it.

Now we know that is not true that bill orielly did not say those words, but to someone that is mentally ill anything that a media figure says might be taken the wrong way, and bill is not the only one either, there were many others Martha McCallum, used words like justice, where is the justice, (allegedly) and there were other comments that could be considered to be incendiary, the fact is clear, here the state of Florida, made a mistake in this case, one that Jess Ashton allegedly is paying for with his job.

What if they passed a law where the families of those that were wrongfully accused, (charged with the wrong crime) that the state had to pay for the legal expenses of the accused, would that not change this no holds barred charging that the state of Florida seems to think is lawful?

Allegedly in the state of Florida if you J walk they charge you will wreckless driving, sound comical but in this case it was accurate, they had a slam dunk case, but they wanted what they could not prove, they wanted death, but they could not prove it, because there was no real evidence.

Perhaps so, that may be something that the legal profession should be pushing for.

The fact remains that there was no evidence that connected this girl with this crime, none at all and that in itself is troublesome, simply because in the world of forensics, it is very difficult to not leave any evidence behind, that is not a natural skill, it is a learned skill.

This girl did not plan this out, and if she was involved in this horrible thing, she had help.

That is the facts, and if the state of Florida had just charged the case with accidental manslaughter, or some other equally easy to live with charge, they could have gotten a guilty across the board, win, but they did not do that they wanted to take the life based on what?  Nothing, they had nothing at all, to tie this girl to this horrible thing.

yet, the media is intent upon seeking justice, that is wrong and must stop now.

The media needs to get over itself as judge jury and executioner because that is not the function of the media.

Bill Get over it, and think about what you are saying, because people listen to you and no matter how angry you might be, if someone comes along and takes action on your words, you are responsible for what you say.

 

Categories
Politics

fox news bias

Fox news, Judge Jury Executioner,

 

Update did fox news, influence the trial by allegedly using negative descriptors and multiple "one way only" opinionated, bobble heads.  What could happen if Fox news continues its allegedly slanted coverage and harm comes to Casey Anthony as a direct result of Fox news allowing its bobble heads to continue to rip on this woman even though she was not convicted by a jury of her peers.

Even the somewhat less than fair and ballanced, Bill orielly openly stated that he was angry.

What would happen if someone with an unballanced mind, were to go out and take action based on Bill orielly and his statements of how Angry he is about the verdict, is that right?

Is that how Fair and Ballanced news coverage is created these days or is that a mistake by Bill?

We want to know because if in the great mind of Bill his opinion is the only one that matters why not just incite violence?

The reason why you dont do those things is that no one can be certain of the circumstances, and that may even as horrible as it might sound that might also include casey, what happened, may have been a very terrible accident, that was not handled, correctly, we may never know, but you know what is worse, that is when the so called fair and ballanced news coverage is allegedly anything but fair and ballanced.

 

More fox news Bias

today there was a lot of alleged bias that was presented by several bobble heads, including Phil Keating, and others, who shot off their mouths without the benefit of the intelligence that most people should have before making broad statements, in fact fox news producers played a question and answer session, between the judge and the defendant, that is normal in all such cases, yet, fox news producers failed to make that distinction when they played that tape.

Some viewers may have been misled by such playing of video without the benefit of explanation, this is not right and is biased in fact it might even open up Fox news to lawsuits should someone choose to do so, since opinion and misrepresentation, is not the same thing.

Is fox news real news or are they fake news with producers that may allegedly be intentionally misleading consumers of news?

 

Looking at the production process how hard is it to present two sides, after all as they say, "there are two sides to every story"

And somewhere between the two different sides of this story is likely the truth, knowing this and knowing the human condition how can any media company not present both sides of a case.

 

is there really any such thing as fair and balanced, news?

This is an interesting video but does not NBC and ABC and CBS and MSNBC do they not also represent a point of view?

When you consider it that way does not every news company represented a point of view as well?

Is any news company a real news company?

 

Categories
2014 vote them out

health care options

I received this in an email from a website visitor and reader.

It is interesting and I like history so thought I would share it with everyone.

Interesting statistics

 There are actually two messages here. 

 

The 1st is very interesting, but the 2nd is absolutely
astounding – and explains a lot.

 A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health Organization.

Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis:

U.S.   65%
England     46%
Canada 42%

Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment within six months:

U.S.   93%
England     15%
Canada 43%

Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:

U.S.   90%
England     15%
Canada 43%

Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:


U.S.   77%
England     40%
Canada 43%

Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:

U.S.   71
England     14
Canada 18

Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in "excellent health":

U.S.   12%
England   2%
Canada    6%

And Obama wants to change our system to like those in England and Canada.

 
Check this last set of statistics!!

The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet. 

You know what the private business sector is…areal-life business, not a government job. 
Here are the percentages.

T. Roosevelt……….38%
Taft…………………..40%
Wilson ……………….52%
Harding…………….49%
Coolidge……………. 48%
Hoover……………..42%
F. Roosevelt………50%
Truman…………….50%
Eisenhower…………57%
Kennedy…………..30%
Johnson……………47%
Nixon…………………53%
Ford…………………42%
Carter…………………32%
Reagan……………..56%
G. H. Bush…………. 51%
Clinton  …………..39%
G. W. Bush………….55%

And the winner is:

Obama…………… 8%

 
This helps to explain the incompetence of this administration:
only 8% of them have ever worked in private business!

That's right!  Only eight percent—the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents! 
And these people are trying to tell our big corporations how to run their business? 
They know what's best for GM, Chrysler, Wall Street, and you and me?

How can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the
most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about
business when he's never worked for one? 

Or about jobs when he has never really had one? 

And when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers? 

They've spent most of their time in academia, government and/or non-profit jobs

or as "community organizers." They should have been in an employment line.

 
Pass this on…  we'll NEVER see these facts in the main stream media.

 
"One of the penalties of not participating in politics is that you will be governed by your inferiors." Plato