Categories
Politics

Will you vote or will you do nothing…

There is a time when good men will stand up and vote, this year not only will much depend upon the voter but also the message that you want to send, you may not be a republican, but if you consider yourself an American there is only one choice.

You hear the chanting of the often crazy talk of those that would enslave you they want to scare you with talk of chaining you up.

But you know the truth, they say things like Romney will be the worst president, (but what proof do they have?)

When you do more than listen to what they are saying you have to come to the conclusion that what they are saying makes no sense at all.

I was in line behind a guy a while back and he said something that really made me wonder about him and what he was doing, he was talking on a cell phone and telling someone at the other end of that conversation that they had better be getting all this political money, that he was racking up thousands of dollars posting in online forums, and posting on blogs, this guy was about 400 lbs, and was cashing checks at a check casher.

This is the guy that sits in him mothers basement in his underwear arguing with people about stupid things and saying nasty things about good people.

This is the guy, that you hate, because he has sold his soul for money.

The truth here is clear if you love America you know who to vote for if you love a Europe style government, vote for the socialists.

The one big problem you need to consider is simply this during the second World War, had it not been for America, those people over there would have laid down and kissed the mans boots while he shoveled their children into the grave.

But America came and sacrificed greatly of its blood and its people and the steel of many ships.

So you can sit in your house and not vote or you can think that there will be plenty of other people out there to help represent you while you sit on your couch and do nothing…

Our fathers fathers and our fore fathers, sacrificed much for this great nation, can you not get off the couch and Vote.

Categories
Politics

skewed polls more bad math?

Are we seeing more bad math in the assumption of many polls that show an unrealistic lead for the democratic candidate with many news companies reporting this as fact when it might not be could it be further proof that the media may not be trustworthy.

If you believe the media there is no real need to have an election which would be somewhat insulting if it were actually coming from a credible source but sadly as many have suggested over the last few years journalism is dead.

 Polls used to be a little more accurate however now it appears that for the most part a poll is just a tool for whom ever pays the most money.

Why bother if all your doing is trying to muddy the water.

 

 

Categories
ABC Gossip ABC tabloid? anthony wiener bias news coverage bill clinton for president Politics

Is Debbie Wasserman a Liar?

This is a news story that you will not hear on many radio shows or even TV shows, but are you not tired and sick unto death of Liars?

Well here is proof, that you cannot tell a lie and get away with it yet for some reason people think its ok to lie about the liars.

Funny thing is that when you lie and you think no one can tell that your lying.

 



Categories
Politics

Bill orielly Anger?

Bill is mad allegedly and bill is angry allegedly but could it all backfire on him and his popularity now that Glenn Beck is gone?

 

Bill orielly Judge Jury and executioner?

 

Bill is Angry why is that?

Last night on national TV Bill continued his proscution, of Casey Anthony regardless that those that sat in judgement of her aquitted her of the charge of murder, which was right, there was no evidence that murder ever took place beyond a reasonable doubt.

No cause of death proven or even known.

No cloroform, found in trunk of car, (unproven electronic "sniffer" technology) does not count sorry bobble heads.

No DNA found, either in the car or at the crime scene, that matched Casey Anthony,

But was there some DNA found there, that matched no one in the Anthony Family?

This case was wrong to begin with now after weeks of trash talking bobble heads like Bill orielly cannot admit when they are wrong simple as that.

There are two things were I take issue with Bills take on this entire boon doggle, that was and may still be the Casey Anthony Trial, and that was that there was no real evidence that any crime took place, yet, everyone Assumed, that there was some horrible crime. 

They assumed that there was guilt because the media covered the case in every possible negative light.

Everything about this case screamed that some accident befell this child, not purposeful intent, but accident, terrible and horrible result yes, and punishment should be severe yes.

However, the state had no proof that this woman was involved in this crime.

Yet, Bill is angry, why is that?   Because he was convinced, that the girl was guilty of a terrible horrible crime?

Because he was so opinionated that he could not conceive that the girl might not have actually committed a murder at all?

Is that why he is so angry?

You see I have a problem with that simply because the media has a responsibility, to protect the public when they make statements like bill orielly made last night you can be sure that several mentally unstable individuals heard that and may have decided that they need to take the law into their own hands.

When you are a celebrity that is also a media figure, you have a responsibility to protect the public from speculation that may in fact be misplaced, now what would happen if later this year Casey Anthony is released then is gunned down, by some mentally ill person and the first thing that comes out of their mouths is, Bill orielly told me to do it.

Now we know that is not true that bill orielly did not say those words, but to someone that is mentally ill anything that a media figure says might be taken the wrong way, and bill is not the only one either, there were many others Martha McCallum, used words like justice, where is the justice, (allegedly) and there were other comments that could be considered to be incendiary, the fact is clear, here the state of Florida, made a mistake in this case, one that Jess Ashton allegedly is paying for with his job.

What if they passed a law where the families of those that were wrongfully accused, (charged with the wrong crime) that the state had to pay for the legal expenses of the accused, would that not change this no holds barred charging that the state of Florida seems to think is lawful?

Allegedly in the state of Florida if you J walk they charge you will wreckless driving, sound comical but in this case it was accurate, they had a slam dunk case, but they wanted what they could not prove, they wanted death, but they could not prove it, because there was no real evidence.

Perhaps so, that may be something that the legal profession should be pushing for.

The fact remains that there was no evidence that connected this girl with this crime, none at all and that in itself is troublesome, simply because in the world of forensics, it is very difficult to not leave any evidence behind, that is not a natural skill, it is a learned skill.

This girl did not plan this out, and if she was involved in this horrible thing, she had help.

That is the facts, and if the state of Florida had just charged the case with accidental manslaughter, or some other equally easy to live with charge, they could have gotten a guilty across the board, win, but they did not do that they wanted to take the life based on what?  Nothing, they had nothing at all, to tie this girl to this horrible thing.

yet, the media is intent upon seeking justice, that is wrong and must stop now.

The media needs to get over itself as judge jury and executioner because that is not the function of the media.

Bill Get over it, and think about what you are saying, because people listen to you and no matter how angry you might be, if someone comes along and takes action on your words, you are responsible for what you say.

 

Categories
Politics

Can Casey Anthony get a fair trial?

Guilty as charged, that is what we will see, and why is that you may ask?

Why wait, for a verdict, everyone knows that she is guilty, right?

Everyone knows it because the media has told us for days, that they "think" she is guilty.

Simple, this case was tried in the court of public opinion and it was tried in the media.

But ask your self one thing, if Casey Anthony is so stupid, and such a monster, how did she manage to leave no evidence behind?

There are a lot of implications in the idea that this trial has been for the most part played out in the media.

When you have personal opinion presented as fact, can anyone have a fair trial is this the end of the justice system as we know it. 

There are indications allegedly that the judge may not be fair minded in his approach to adjudicating, this case allegedly he has sided with the prosecuting agency in allegedly 98 percent of the objections.   Even in stupid cases, the average is 78 percent allegedly.

That is a difference of 20 percent allegedly give or take a percentage point or two, the thing that is really amazing here is that you have what appears to be bias from allegedly the judge in this case, so what is up with that, if it is true can this young lady (I know some people think that she is guilty and should be tired and executed in the press)

The thing is should a media company have only one point of view?

Can this girl get a fair trial, when the media is constantly and allegedly presenting only a biased point of view can she get a fair trial, just curious because it looks like everyone in the world is convinced, that this girl murdered her own child and there is no proof, period, nothing the prosecution has presented is real allegedly they can prove nothing about her actual connection to this tragedy, now, is this woman morally responsible for her child, (Yes certainly) and she should be punished, but without proof can we begin to start putting people to death?

Should the media only present one side of an issue, considering that this is a life and death care, should the media be allegedly biased?

That is something that is serious and it is something that people should seriously consider.

Categories
911

Charlie Sheen crazy?

Is Charlie Sheen really crazy?

Is this a big giant publicity stunt?

Does he really need help?

Could he be in need of a medication for schizophrenia or perhaps as some has suggested bi polar.

Most certainly he is angry and perhaps rightfully so.

In one picture he looks like someone that has eyes as big as wagon wheels, in yet another picture he looks almost normal.
Yet again he looks angry and in a fugue state. Still it is anyone guess what is actually going on, perhaps he is crazy, and in need of help.

If that is true, then someone should help him, send in John Rambo, or someone just like him and I guarantee that results will be had.

If he needs help he should have it, like it or not, but if he is playing some complicated game, then of course hopefully he has the best legal advice money can buy.

It is strange to watch, while we have seen some celebrities recently be charged with serious crimes, and still others, going to jail, and others being punished as an example for others, so in reality, what proof do we have other than a video, which frankly is not beyond his still as an actor.

Still, it is a concern, you have to wonder what is really going on, I look at CBS and think you know what, the guy is ill, and the first thing you want to do is try to save some money, that just plain is wrong and I do not like it, I hope that he gets help if he needs it, we just do not know, simply because the media has blown this entirely out of proportion. There is no real way to know for sure, I know I do not trust in the networks take on the situation, I suspect that they have acted in violation of the agreement and that the union should be stepping in to settle things down.

One way or another, one can only hope for the best in this situation, hopefully this is all just an act and all will be revealed later much to the disappointment of the slackers in Holly dude, land.

In some ways I can understand at least some of the behavior, but not all of it, If he proves a point at how the media can distorts the facts so far out of the realm of truth that no one knows for sure what is really going on, then perhaps it was worth it, again though if he is truly troubled and needs help someone should step up and man up to get him the help he needs like it or not.

That is what friends are for, and if he has no friends, then those low lifers that are hanging around him need to go to jail if something happens to CS.

Categories
911 aclu

Arizona shooting could security have prevented it?

Every aspect of this tragedy has been covered, right? Perhaps not, while everyone has been trying to point the

We have seen 24 hour coverage on this horrible and tragic even over the last few days, and even seen the Pima county Sheriff come out and blame it on politics, which of course he has admitted he has no proof, however the real story here is Where was Dupnik when this happened, could he have prevented this terrible crime?

Could any reasonable Law enforcement official, who had alleged previous contact with this alleged criminal, have foreseen this event?

Had there been security would this alleged shooter been able to do what the did do?

Since Dupnik seems to want to politicize this thing, Where was he and his deputies, when this tragedy unfolded?

There were signs, the story is coming out now that more and more people saw the signs that something could happen but no one did anything, including the Sheriff, this is a sad thing to know that this could have been prevented if only the sherrif had been on duty at this event, some have said that there was no security, and if that is true it is a very sad thing. But when you see a man like dupnik out there shooting off his mouth about how everyone is to blame but the shooter and dupnik himself, you have to wonder about the mans motivations.

Should dupnik have assigned a security detail at this event, logic tells us yes, and we also know that he could have done this.

As well dupnik could have been aware of the reports of an unstable individual in his jurisdiction.

It is so easy to blame others for what happened, and no doubt this will happen again, as with the Ft hood shootings, and others in the past, the thing is that security needs to be present at these public events, to stop or dissuade this type of horrible thing in the future.

Categories
biased fox news Biased polls bill oreilly

Blame everyone why not blame Bush?

So will we blame everyone for the troubled actions that resulted in a terrible tragedy in Arizona. According to Pima county Sheriff, Dupnik alleges without any proof at all, (strange thing if your in law enforcement) that all manner of people are to blame for the actions of a mentally ill young man whom the Sheriff allegedly had contact with and could have taken some action to stop what happened. What is really puzzling is why dupnik choose to blame everyone but himself.

Guilt allegedly is a powerful thing, perhaps that was part of what drove this man to do what he allegedly has done by going on TV and making accusations against people who did not even live in the same state as the accused. Why not blame the parents, they must have known there was something wrong, why not blame the neighbors, they knew there was something wrong, why not blame the students that went to high school with this young man, or how about the college students and what about his teachers, are they not to blame as well?

It seems so strange that everyone is to blame when the unthinkable happens, when we have people on both sides saying things that are less than appropriate.

If it were true, that what people say is to blame for all the worlds problems then we would surely all be doomed, because every day someone says something that may hurt someone’s feelings, or worse, offend them, but that does not mean that they are to blame for a car accident that claims the life of a young child.

It does not help to blame people, to point the finger of blame is not the solution to the human condition.

We are human and that will never change, nothing can be done, there is no cure, you cannot make a law to cure the human condition.

This is why all the laws in the world will not change what it means to be human, what it means to be responsible for the things we choose to do, from running a red light, to speeding, every day we all make choices that effect the outcome of our lives.

It may be easy to blame someone else for the failure of others, but that will not change the sad events that took place nor will it stop another such event from every occurring again, all we can do is to learn from this failure and try to do a better job in the future, sadly that means that as a race, as a human we may see another tragedy happen again in the future, as bad as that is, as bad it would be, there is nothing that can deter a bad choice, because that person that makes the bad choice is responsible for those decisions.

History tells us that no amount of law, nor even good will can change bad intentions, there are things that can be done, however eventually because we are human, this will happen again, until we find a way to care for everyone in our society and that is just not something that is likely to happen anytime soon laws or no laws, new rules or no rules, the outcome of these sad events are an indication that we need to care more for our human condition, when we see someone with a mental issue, we need to do something even if it is just telling someone in authority that a problem may exist.

In this case, the college, where it was alleged, that he may have had some mental issue that might effect his safety and the safety of others, if that was indeed the case, and it appears likely, action should have been taken, it was not, we now know that a letter to the parents was not enough action, but how much is enough and how much is too much? Just passing numerous laws and then just forgetting it ever happened, will not change the chances of something like this happening in the future, nor will attempting to ban guns stop criminals from doing criminal things.

The Columbine High School massacre occurred on Tuesday, April 20, 1999, at Columbine High School.

This was before 911, and before schools installed metal detectors yet it did not stop it from happening, again.

We have seen far too much of this kind of thing, yet, of all the things that have been done and all the things that we can do to remain aware of the suffering of those that have mental issues, we must try harder, passing law after law will not help, but being aware of suffering and doing all we can to help that individual can help reduce the likely hood that this would happen again, that is the only true way to really help.

It is when we do not take action, when we see a problem and do nothing, or when we wait until after a tragedy has occurred to try and take action that is when we do more harm than good, caring for our neighbors is the only true way we can help them.

Pointing the finger of blame with the idea of using it to gain political ground is perhaps even worse that the tragic events that occurred this past Saturday, simply because it contributes to the problem, it does not solve the problem, so when I see news reporters, making reckless statements, and commentators blaming everyone but the person who actually did the alleged crime, that enables the next person to do the same thing later, and that is why the name calling and the blame game should stop, how can we expect society to be civilized when the media will not act like they are civilized.

Shame on the media for the way they have behaved, shame on the advertisers for advertising on those networks that have used this to a political advantage.

Caring for those that are sick and hurt, and doing the right thing, which means telling someone in authority and then holding that person accountable for a failure to take action that is one way this could have been prevented, but blaming other people for political gain, is a shame on the profession of journalism.

Categories
Aarp aclu acorn

NPR defund?

Should NPR be De-funded of Tax Dollars, many are saying that yes, this should be done and soon because NPR appears to mostly and allegedly only represent one point of view and that is the alleged, liberal left point of view, this is scary and it could be evil, one thing we know for sure, apparently at NPR there is no first Amendment.

Is this the truth, does NPR believe that Americans should have no opinion other than the one NPR has?

What is going on when we have a communications company that is supported by the public and supported by tax dollars, what is happening when that same communications company has no regard for the first amendment.

The call is going out to stop funding what is allegedly mostly a left progressive political machine.

The idea is that they are no longer representative of what America stands for and that is freedom.

NPR allegedly is far left and its decision to fire Juan Williams is proof that allegedly they are biased.

This is a sad day for Radio, when a communications company which is by the way bound by law, and the FCC to act in a responsible manner, yet they have allegedly not done this.

Many organizations are calling for any and all public funding of this allegedly evil organization to stop right now.

It is time for America to be for Americans.

Sarah Palin calls for NPR to be de-funded.