News media biased on sestak

So will this com­pa­ny be able to intim­i­date, the pub­lic, or will they alleged­ly be sued, who knows..
It is alleged that even fox news is not real­ly cov­er­ing this entire sto­ry, but one thing for sure this is not going away, why?

Sim­ple, it is called, BLAGO…

Right now, the most trans­par­ent admin­is­tra­tion ever, LOL, is attempt­ing to put bla­go in jail for the same thing that this admin­is­tra­tion just did with ses­tak, it is real­ly not that big of a deal, except if it is wrong for bla­go…

Should it not be wrong for the rest of the politi­cians?

Is the media soft on cer­tain top­ics, we just have to ask, I mean it is even pos­si­ble to get decent news these days, on one hand you have fox news, that tends to go too far right, or left, they cant seem to make up their minds what they want to do, they may say they are fair and bal­anced, but in real­i­ty if the talk­ing head is lib­er­al, or con­ser­v­a­tive, the con­ver­sa­tion tends to fol­low that ide­ol­o­gy.

So real­ly why cant we get decent cov­er­age on this Pay for play thing, it is some­thing that has been going on for years, and years, Bla­go is not the first he will not be the last, but he is being pros­e­cut­ed, by an admin­is­tra­tion that will not pur­sue the black pan­thers…

You have to won­der about stuff like that,

This is a valid ques­tion and it is some­thing that needs an answer, are net­works like NBC, CBS, CNBC, alleged­ly not cov­er­ing the break­ing news sto­ry that per­haps a scan­dal involv­ing ses­tak may in fact be a crime, that should be inves­ti­gat­ed.

If CBS, NBC, CNBC, CNN, and oth­ers do not report on this sto­ry then are they actu­al­ly so biased that they can no longer report the news effec­tive­ly, and if that is true then what good are they, why should any­one watch them?

Even worse is this if this were a repub­li­can, would the same media sources be call­ing for res­ig­na­tion?

Ask your­self this, when alleged­ly the media becomes so biased with alleged yel­low jour­nal­ism, that they can no longer effec­tive­ly cov­er a news sto­ry then they have failed as a human being and as a jour­nal­ist.

So the real sto­ry here may actu­al­ly be that had water gate been about a demo­c­rat it might nev­er have been report­ed? Is that even pos­si­bly true? If it were would you ever buy mer­chan­dise that one of these biased news com­pa­nies were to offer you?

Is this the death of the media in Amer­i­ca, no longer can the media report news?

If the only sto­ries they can cov­er are biased, then what good are they?