super congress Unconstitutional?

Spread the love

It is Amaz­ing stuff here we are see­ing what amounts to alleged­ly crim­i­nal activ­i­ty by our own con­gress?

 

This idea of a super com­mit­tee, with the idea that if they don’t com­pro­mise in some way, that ben­e­fits Wash­ing­to­ni­ans view of this mess we are cur­rent­ly in, is not only stu­pid but uncon­sti­tu­tion­al.  We have seri­ous prob­lems, and no mat­ter what hap­pens next, we must fol­low the con­sti­tu­tion, why?

Because it has got­ten us this far, and you know what with­out it we would be noth­ing.

We sur­vived, for two rea­sons, and more, but the most impor­tant rea­sons that Amer­i­ca because so strong and pow­er­ful was that God fear­ing men and the women that sup­port­ed them risked their lives to pro­duce what we have as the con­sti­tu­tion, we have got­ten away from that over the years.

Will this to appoint a com­mit­tee to alleged­ly bypass the will of the Amer­i­can peo­ple and alleged­ly raise tax­es on the wealthy, and alleged­ly have all this decid­ed by a small group of indi­vid­u­als, con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly sound with words like the Gang of six being  talked about on TV,

but I read no where in the con­sti­tu­tion where a spend­ing bill can be orig­i­nat­ed by any gang at all.

This is uncon­sti­tu­tion­al and it must not be allowed to stand.

Spend­ing bills shall orig­i­nate in the house not in the sen­ate and the Unit­ed States of Amer­i­ca, Gangs do not run this nation.

Not gangs of Six or Gangs of 12 or Gangs, of any con­gres­sion­al sort.

We must seri­ous progress and not the type that Har­ry Reid wants either, 80 per­cent of Amer­i­ca wants this fixed and gangs are not the Answer.

 “The exclu­sive priv­i­lege of orig­i­nat­ing mon­ey bills will belong to the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives.”

This is the way it has always been but sud­den­ly when the Amer­i­can peo­ple are against what Wash­ing­ton wants to do, then they can find some kind of igno­rant method of try­ing to bypass the will of the peo­ple?

The house should reject this and send again the bills that have not yet been con­sid­ered, and con­tin­ue to send them until they have so many copies sit­ting on their tables, that there is room for noth­ing else. There can be only one answer here and it is to return to sane spend­ing lev­els of 2007 that is what needs to be done, because if we keep on doing what we have been doing there will be anoth­er depres­sion and no one wants that right?

Because The Amer­i­can peo­ple were clear in the last elec­tion, we must have a sane and fair res­o­lu­tion to this issue.