ACLU Lawsuits?

So the ACLU can file a law­suit on every hand, they can dis­rupt the lives of peo­ple and no one seems to mind or to even care, what would hap­pen if the ACLU were to file a law­suit against a man who was dis­abled and dying of a ter­mi­nal ill­ness, depriv­ing him of his abil­i­ty to receive med­ical treat­ment, would that be ok?

Sounds crazy right sure and it would be, but the thing here is this why is it so one sided, why is the ACLU the only one fil­ing a law­suit, some of these law­suits that are filed are friv­o­lous, (alleged­ly) tor­ment­ing schools that dare to try and pray, when the con­sti­tu­tion guar­an­tees that free­dom of reli­gion is a God giv­en right. So, why do peo­ple allow the ACLU to get away with just suing and run­ning at every hand once they have what they want?

Hope­ful­ly at some point some­one would step up to the plate, and say you know what all your law­suits aimed at the Chris­t­ian faith is actu­al­ly in Bad faith, and should not be allowed to con­tin­ue.

Where is the ACLU in the Ban­ning of Reli­gion in the 911 Memo­r­i­al, who ever heard of hav­ing a memo­r­i­al with­out the cler­gy?

When is lib­er­ty no longer lib­er­ty, when the ACLU says it is?

This nation was found­ed upon the Free­dom of Reli­gion, yes, that means Chris­t­ian, and Cler­gy and Catholic and Bap­tist, and Pen­te­costal, and oth­er reli­gions, it nev­er applied the way those cor­rupt codgers and snakes said it did, you could say the sky is pur­ple and pol­ka dot­ted, if you want­ed, but that would only be your opin­ion and prob­a­bly not a pop­u­lar one at that.

That would cer­tain­ly make peo­ple think twice about all these law­suits about reli­gion which by the way is actu­al­ly guar­an­teed long before any oth­er thoughts on this issue, and of even more inter­est is the very real fact that what they say about the sep­a­ra­tion of Church and State was nev­er meant to apply to prayer in the first place, what that was meant to do was to keep mem­bers of the Roman Catholic Church from hold­ing both a high posi­tion in the Church and the Gov­ern­ment, that was all it ever meant, and when men of high under­stand­ing apply log­ic to that inter­pre­ta­tion then you must acknowl­edge that it is cor­rect. Because nev­er would have that been the case had it been word­ed that way the found­ing fathers made it clear, but some­where in the past evil men twist­ed it into their own vile under­stand­ing.

But the com­mon man under­stands the truth. The truth is that just because some­one has an agen­da against reli­gion, does not mean that what they try to do is right, it only means that the peo­ple failed to stand up to the bul­lies of low rank. So the next time some­one talks about sup­port­ing the ACLU con­sid­er what you are sup­port­ing, unless the ACLU begins to show that they are not biased in how they file their law­suits, and that means sup­port­ing things for oth­er than one side of the sto­ry or one side of the coin.

When they start doing that then they will receive much more sup­port.

That is what they should be doing in stead of pur­su­ing only one side against the oth­er.