Categories
Politics

the Myth of Seperation of Church and State

The American people have been lied to for many years…

No where in the Constitution does it allow Christians to be persecuted like they are these days.

No where in the Constitution does it allow Atheists to have a religion, (Atheism) protected by the Government, If a Cross represents and or depicts an establishment, of a religion then the lack of a Cross
at a Grave, deprives a Christian of the same.  

Can I saw that it is stupid to believe that Christianity was not already an established religion before the Constitution was written.   Yes, you hear correctly, Establish, means To set up, to create, to ensure or to otherwise generate and fabricate. 

How can you create what has already been created.  This nation was created, established as a nation of believers, who are free to pursue their own brand of beliefs including religion, this includes the lack of a religion which itself is a religion, and why not, who else would put such energy into fighting God but someone that was a believer in non-belief.  As such non-belief, or the pursuit of Atheism, must be a religion just as the worship of any person or non person would be respected as a religion.  Under the constitution they are free to believe or not to believe they are free to believe in any prophet, or personage they wish.

Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting
the free exercise thereof…

One thing seems clear prohibiting, the free exercise of religion
is a violation and when you start to say that you can no longer
display a Christmas tree, in public, is that not prohibiting the free exercise of religion?

This idea that the separation of Church and State requires that the government must interfere with every single interpretation of any prayer, or any other liberty this is just insanity.

 

The plain language shows that the First Amendment restricts only Congress’ powers!

The People of the States are free to establish (or dis-establish) any religion they want – this is one of the powers retained by the States or the People!  Several States did retain their established religions after ratification of the U.S. Constitution in 1789.  We saw that in 1807, Presbyterians in Chester, N.H. sold a Quaker’s cow for non-payment of the Minister’s Tax.  Not until the Toleration Act of 1819 did the Legislature of N.H. make it illegal for towns, as corporate bodies, to raise money for the support of the gospel. Connecticut did not dis-establish the Congregational Church until they adopted their Constitution of 1818 (see Article Seventh). Massachusetts did not dis-establish the Congregational Church until 1833.

Categories
911

Separation of Church and State is a lie

Could it be true that what some have believed for years is based on a lie?

On 9/11 this year the (Mayor who is likely on his last term as Mayor) cited the separation of Church and state, as his reason for banning, Clergy and Prayer, from the 911 ceremonies, it is interesting, that we can so easily be lied to and so many people seem to say ok, it seems like an odd thing.

Originally the “So Called Separation of Church and State, was meant to keep the Roman Catholic Church Officials from holding important Government positions, or important state positions, simple as that, back in the time when this was written into the constitution, part of the troubles that the framers of the Constitution saw was that there were some in power that were both highly ranked leaders in the Church and also they were highly ranked and powerful leaders in the State, which would call for some likely difficult situations, this was all it was designed to do, however we have over the years accepted a lie in exchange for the truth of what history was.

For those that know a little about history, there was a problem with some Church Officials, being also involved in government, this was a source of alleged corruption, however what this has become is everything even a symbol of any kind of religion is now considered, (at least for those who are not educated and do not know history) like Bloomberg, they consider even things like a Christmas tree as a violation, if prayer is a violation then how long before they twist bend and mutilate the truth until they imprison even those that would think a prayer.

The thought police, yes, sounds crazy but that is the end result when you first begin to twist the trust into a lie.

Categories
Politics

ACLU Lawsuits?

So the ACLU can file a lawsuit on every hand, they can disrupt the lives of people and no one seems to mind or to even care, what would happen if the ACLU were to file a lawsuit against a man who was disabled and dying of a terminal illness, depriving him of his ability to receive medical treatment, would that be ok?

Sounds crazy right sure and it would be, but the thing here is this why is it so one sided, why is the ACLU the only one filing a lawsuit, some of these lawsuits that are filed are frivolous, (allegedly) tormenting schools that dare to try and pray, when the constitution guarantees that freedom of religion is a God given right. So, why do people allow the ACLU to get away with just suing and running at every hand once they have what they want?

Hopefully at some point someone would step up to the plate, and say you know what all your lawsuits aimed at the Christian faith is actually in Bad faith, and should not be allowed to continue.

Where is the ACLU in the Banning of Religion in the 911 Memorial, who ever heard of having a memorial without the clergy?

When is liberty no longer liberty, when the ACLU says it is?

This nation was founded upon the Freedom of Religion, yes, that means Christian, and Clergy and Catholic and Baptist, and Pentecostal, and other religions, it never applied the way those corrupt codgers and snakes said it did, you could say the sky is purple and polka dotted, if you wanted, but that would only be your opinion and probably not a popular one at that.

 

That would certainly make people think twice about all these lawsuits about religion which by the way is actually guaranteed long before any other thoughts on this issue, and of even more interest is the very real fact that what they say about the separation of Church and State was never meant to apply to prayer in the first place, what that was meant to do was to keep members of the Roman Catholic Church from holding both a high position in the Church and the Government, that was all it ever meant, and when men of high understanding apply logic to that interpretation then you must acknowledge that it is correct. Because never would have that been the case had it been worded that way the founding fathers made it clear, but somewhere in the past evil men twisted it into their own vile understanding.

 

But the common man understands the truth. The truth is that just because someone has an agenda against religion, does not mean that what they try to do is right, it only means that the people failed to stand up to the bullies of low rank. So the next time someone talks about supporting the ACLU consider what you are supporting, unless the ACLU begins to show that they are not biased in how they file their lawsuits, and that means supporting things for other than one side of the story or one side of the coin.

 

When they start doing that then they will receive much more support.

That is what they should be doing in stead of pursuing only one side against the other.