So the ACLU can file a lawsuit on every hand, they can disrupt the lives of people and no one seems to mind or to even care, what would happen if the ACLU were to file a lawsuit against a man who was disabled and dying of a terminal illness, depriving him of his ability to receive medical treatment, would that be ok?
Sounds crazy right sure and it would be, but the thing here is this why is it so one sided, why is the ACLU the only one filing a lawsuit, some of these lawsuits that are filed are frivolous, (allegedly) tormenting schools that dare to try and pray, when the constitution guarantees that freedom of religion is a God given right. So, why do people allow the ACLU to get away with just suing and running at every hand once they have what they want?
Hopefully at some point someone would step up to the plate, and say you know what all your lawsuits aimed at the Christian faith is actually in Bad faith, and should not be allowed to continue.
Where is the ACLU in the Banning of Religion in the 911 Memorial, who ever heard of having a memorial without the clergy?
When is liberty no longer liberty, when the ACLU says it is?
This nation was founded upon the Freedom of Religion, yes, that means Christian, and Clergy and Catholic and Baptist, and Pentecostal, and other religions, it never applied the way those corrupt codgers and snakes said it did, you could say the sky is purple and polka dotted, if you wanted, but that would only be your opinion and probably not a popular one at that.
That would certainly make people think twice about all these lawsuits about religion which by the way is actually guaranteed long before any other thoughts on this issue, and of even more interest is the very real fact that what they say about the separation of Church and State was never meant to apply to prayer in the first place, what that was meant to do was to keep members of the Roman Catholic Church from holding both a high position in the Church and the Government, that was all it ever meant, and when men of high understanding apply logic to that interpretation then you must acknowledge that it is correct. Because never would have that been the case had it been worded that way the founding fathers made it clear, but somewhere in the past evil men twisted it into their own vile understanding.
But the common man understands the truth. The truth is that just because someone has an agenda against religion, does not mean that what they try to do is right, it only means that the people failed to stand up to the bullies of low rank. So the next time someone talks about supporting the ACLU consider what you are supporting, unless the ACLU begins to show that they are not biased in how they file their lawsuits, and that means supporting things for other than one side of the story or one side of the coin.
When they start doing that then they will receive much more support.
That is what they should be doing in stead of pursuing only one side against the other.