Shut it down?

Is this the End of Wash­ing­ton?

Should we look for the sky to fall?

Where is Chick­en Lit­tle?

So should we be wor­ried, if you watch the news, you might have noticed the over­ly dra­mat­ic ren­di­tion of oh my chick­en lit­tle the sky is falling, but seri­ous­ly folks, this is not the first time that Gov­ern­ment has been shut down and guess what we sur­vived it the last time, but sad­ly the high and mighty press seems to not be able to report on the news any more.

I have to ask, do they think we are all stu­pid?

I can google this, The 1995 “shut­down” of the Unit­ed States fed­er­al gov­ern­ment was the result of a con­flict between Demo­c­ra­t­ic Pres­i­dent Clin­ton and the Repub­li­can-con­trolled Con­gress over fund­ing for Medicare, edu­ca­tion, the envi­ron­ment and pub­lic health. It took place after Clin­ton vetoed the spend­ing bill which Con­gress sent him.

So, wait lets, see the last time this hap­pened, it was the democ­rats that start­ed it right?

So, then if we exam­ine this more care­ful­ly are we not in the same sit­u­a­tion right now as we were back in 1995? The answer has to be a big fat yes, Yet, the fair and bal­le­ri­na media can­not report this fact?

Dear Patri­ot,

We’re being inun­dat­ed with news about the Fed­er­al gov­ern­men­t’s bud­get nego­ti­a­tions and a poten­tial gov­ern­ment shut­down. Not sur­pris­ing­ly, the Democ­rats have no desire to cut spend­ing and lim­it gov­ern­men­t’s reach. Repub­li­cans have pro­posed a bud­get that would trim $6 tril­lion over the next 10 years, which is clear­ly quite a bit bet­ter, but that breaks out to a cut of only around $600 bil­lion a year. Our annu­al bud­get short­fall is about $1.6 tril­lion!

The only bud­get pro­pos­al that actu­al­ly bal­ances the bud­get came from Sen. Rand Paul, whose pro­pos­al bal­ances the bud­get with­in 5 five years, and has the gov­ern­ment run­ning a sur­plus by 2016. If we ever hope to see anoth­er tru­ly bal­anced bud­get, it’s obvi­ous that we need to elect more Tea Par­ty can­di­dates. Help us elect Tea Par­ty con­ser­v­a­tives by mak­ing a dona­tion –HERE–

In 2011, the only chance for us to replace a lib­er­al Demo­c­rat with a true Tea Par­ty con­ser­v­a­tive is the Ken­tucky Gov­er­nor’s race. The Tea Par­ty can­di­date in the race is Phil Mof­fett, a suc­cess­ful busi­ness­man who under­stands the impor­tance of effi­cien­cy and bal­anced bud­gets. Our com­pre­hen­sive inde­pen­dent expen­di­ture cam­paign on his behalf will involve broad­cast ads, an earned media cam­paign, and putting staff on the ground in Ken­tucky to help ral­ly grass­roots sup­port. To help us elect a true Tea Par­ty con­ser­v­a­tive as Gov­er­nor of Ken­tucky, please make a con­tri­bu­tion –HERE–

The lib­er­als in the media con­tin­u­al­ly ques­tion whether the Tea Par­ty is still alive and able to influ­ence elec­tions. We can­not let them con­tin­ue spout­ing this non­sense! It’s up to us to prove that Tea Par­ty can­di­dates can still win! Help us prove the lib­er­als wrong by click­ing this