Fox News Polls show What?

Spread the love

In a rather amaz­ing dis­play of faulty Jour­nal­ism, Fox News, report­ed today sev­er­al polls which fea­tured extrap­o­lat­ed results that are more than just ques­tion­able, they could well be com­plete­ly wrong in every way.

Is it wrong to show a Poll when only a very very small per­cent­age of vot­ers may have been reached?

Yes, it is, you bet your beef cakes it is.

To be fair, they did not state com­plete facts about the polls, only a very small por­tion but read on if you want to hear more about how the news cycle is becom­ing very unbal­anced.

When you look at a poll and you look at how many (Like­ly Vot­ers) were reached and you look at how many peo­ple there are in the Unit­ed States that could become a like­ly vot­er, then you have to ask how can this be a valid con­ver­sa­tion?

Instead it is very like­ly that the polls say things that the peo­ple who paid for the polls to be tak­en.

(nat­u­ral­ly it is hard to imag­ine how reach­ing 500 or 1000 “like­ly vot­ers” trans­lates into facts)

Yet today, Fox News pre­sent­ed these “Polls” as evi­dence if you will of bad things hap­pen­ing for the can­di­dates of the 2016 Pres­i­den­tial elec­tion.

More to come stay tuned, sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly speak­ing, you need at east 5000 “Real Vot­ers” to be able to sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly state that a par­tic­u­lar poll makes any sense at all.

That is not hap­pen­ing and we have seen over and over again how WRONG these so called polls are all the time.

So, If you are a respon­si­ble jour­nal­ist, would you not make that dis­claimer up front or do you lead your view­ers to believe that what you are choos­ing to talk about is Bosh.

Nev­er once did any­one ques­tion the nature of a poll with less than 600 peo­ple who lets face it had noth­ing bet­ter to do than to be at home and answer the phone.

Who were those people?

Elder­ly?

Bed Fast?

Unem­ployed?

When you think about it, the term like­ly vot­ers is mean­ing­less and should be just as mean­ing­less when attempt­ing to have a polit­i­cal dis­cus­sion.

Yet, Fox News and like­ly many oth­ers also have engaged in this kind of dis­tor­tion of the news.


Posted

in

by