Michigan Fraud!

Spread the love

The Media are already report­ing that there is no evi­dence of vote fraud in Michi­gan This sto­ry is being report­ed even before wit­ness­es are pre­sent­ed that can con­firm the fraud that the Media say does not exist!

Think about that for a sec­ond…

Before evi­dence is pre­sent­ed in a pub­lic hear­ing offi­cials are say­ing there is no evi­dence! This would be fun­ny if it were not such a seri­ous issue which is not only valid but there is alleged­ly ver­i­fi­able proof of tam­per­ing and fraud.

In what is becom­ing clear to every hon­est Amer­i­can in these Unit­ed States of Amer­i­ca is that there is a sto­ry that is replay­ing in almost every state and this is not just rumors these are sworn affi­davits under penal­ty of per­jury.

These Peo­ple are risk­ing their rep­u­ta­tions and their per­son­al safe­ty!

These in large part are not paid but vol­un­teers who with­out pay agreed to take part in observ­ing the elec­tion process to be sure that the result was fair, But they were denied mean­ing­ful access… As well as the lib­er­ty guar­an­teed under the Con­sti­tu­tion of the State of Geor­gia and the Unit­ed States Con­sti­tu­tion.

This sto­ry is being told by Patri­ots and con­cerned vot­ers who have eye wit­ness tes­ti­mo­ny and phys­i­cal evi­dence to present that will show the shock­ing truth behind the 2020 Elec­tion Fraud Event!

In every sin­gle case it is clear that the “Mail In Bal­lot Counts” show a clear con­nec­tion to not only ques­tion­able vot­ing results but out­right fraud and pos­si­bly even crim­i­nal acts by Domin­ion Vot­ing per­son­al and alleged­ly democ­rats who are tak­ing every step to deny the vot­ers the truth about this elec­tion.

It Start­ed in Penn­syl­va­nia where more than a mil­lion “Mail In Bal­lots” appeared overnight after tab­u­la­tion cen­ters where sum­mar­i­ly shut down in sev­er­al states and the com­mon denom­i­na­tor has been domin­ion vot­ing machines, Bro­ken chain of cus­tody, Denial of poll observers to mean­ing­ful­ly exam­ine Bal­lots includ­ing Mail in Bal­lots!

This sto­ry is unde­ni­able!

There are just too many Eye Wit­ness­es that are all giv­ing accounts of what hap­pened and what they saw that goes against State Laws!

When a few peo­ple say some­thing its eas­i­er to just say Oh its iso­lat­ed but this is not just a few peo­ple this is thou­sands of peo­ple and they all have said that they were denied the oppor­tu­ni­ty to see the bal­lots or see the sig­na­tures or to have access to view these ques­tion­able bal­lots.

Most notably the State of Geor­gia which has elec­tion laws gov­ern­ing the exam­i­na­tion of bal­lots.

The Sec of State for Geor­gia alleged­ly has denied the vot­ers of the state of Geor­gia their Con­sti­tu­tion­al right to have their votes count.

Then alleged­ly this man who claims to be a repub­li­can but alleged­ly made a deal with democ­rats to treat bal­lots dif­fer­ent­ly in the 2020 pres­i­den­tial elec­tion.

This guy has the nerve to then stand up and tell what is like­ly and alleged­ly a known lie.

He states that the Trump vot­ers are being mis­led?

Really?

Who is doing the mis­lead­ing here?

The State of Geor­gia has an elec­tion law gov­ern­ing the exam­i­na­tion of Bal­lots. The Sec of State with­out autho­riza­tion of the leg­is­la­ture agreed along with democ­rats to allow mail in bal­lots to be sub­ject to lessor lev­els of val­i­da­tion and almost no over­sight.

They alleged­ly did not accu­rate­ly or thor­ough­ly exam­ine mail in bal­lots which is cor­rob­o­rat­ed by the rejec­tion rate of bal­lots in the 2020 elec­tion is at a rate far below the nor­mal rejec­tion rate for most elec­tions in the state of Geor­gia.

In the 2018 elec­tion 3.5 per­cent of bal­lots were reject­ed for things such as sig­na­tures that did not match, incor­rect address­es, invalid bal­lots being cast using the same address is just one pos­si­ble exam­ple.

In the 2020 elec­tion .3 per­cent of mail in
bal­lots were reject­ed!

This means that approx­i­mate­ly 3.2 per­cent of those mail in bal­lots with exceed­ed 500 per­cent greater num­bers than pre­vi­ous elec­tions in the State of Geor­gia. IF the aver­age per one mil­lion bal­lots is 32,000 bal­lots that like­ly were defec­tive in some way and should not have been count­ed then that is just one exam­ple of how the Sec of State is fail­ing to do his sworn duty to the State of Geor­gia Vot­ers!

Now, his defense is that he set­tled a law­suit, (which alleged­ly Sta­cy Abrams was a par­ty to either by asso­ci­a­tion or by direct par­tic­i­pa­tion)

The law­suit was from democ­rats and the set­tle­ment there­of was to allow mail in bal­lots to be treat­ed dif­fer­ent­ly than in pre­vi­ous elec­tions.

They was done even though Geor­gia law clear­ly states that the Leg­is­la­ture alone holds this author­i­ty and did not agree to this and alleged­ly they like­ly were not even con­sult­ed?

It makes you won­der what is going on in Geor­gia!

They allowed the Estab­lished Geor­gia Elec­tion laws to be sub­vert­ed by the Sec of State and the democ­rats…

This is why that alleged­ly Sta­cy Abrams said that “They have 750,000 absen­tee bal­lot requests” For the Runoff elec­tion…

Because these bal­lots will not be treat­ed the same as bal­lots that Repub­li­can vot­ers will cast in the runoff elec­tion!

Basi­cal­ly what this appears to say to vot­ers is that Demo­c­rat Spon­sored votes which are claimed to have been received by mail will be held to a lessor stan­dard than oth­er bal­lots.

To date the State of Geor­gia have NOT had a valid count of the elec­tion results.

They allowed bal­lots by mail to be held to a lessor stan­dard than all oth­er bal­lots. They did not apply the same stan­dards to mail in bal­lots. Think about that for a sec­ond. The laws of the State of Geor­gia clear­ly state that all bal­lots shall be treat­ed the same way but this did not hap­pen in 2020 Geor­gia elec­tion.

So Geor­gia has not yet had a Valid elec­tion!

By allow­ing poten­tial­ly invalid bal­lots to be count­ed at a high­er rate of accep­tance than all oth­er bal­lots the State of Geor­gia has effec­tive­ly cre­at­ed an invalid elec­tion result.

Now to add insult to injury the State engaged in an alleged­ly waste­ful expen­di­ture of tax pay­er funds to engage in a recount which was not law­ful because they did not apply the cor­rect stan­dards of the exam­i­na­tion of mail in bal­lots.

They recount­ed the same invalid bal­lots with­out apply­ing
the law of the State of Geor­gia!

Now they are active­ly engag­ing in anoth­er recount…

But until the invalid bal­lots are audit­ed and adju­di­cat­ed then the State of Geor­gia has not yet pro­vid­ed a valid elec­tion result.

This clear­ly is a fail­ure of those respec­tive polit­i­cal offi­cers to both per­form their oaths of office and to fol­low the laws of the State.

You can­not ignore the Laws in one elec­tion in order to obtain a dif­fer­ent result than all oth­er Geor­gia Elec­tions.

So, it appears that these actions might well be ille­gal were it to be exam­ined under the appro­pri­ate author­i­ties and judi­cial over­sight.

Yet, these offi­cials are not address­ing this issue.

They along with the media are ignor­ing this change in the appli­ca­tion of Geor­gia Laws to Elec­tion Bal­lots.

The Democ­rats ignored the Valid elec­tion laws gov­ern­ing the exam­i­na­tion of bal­lots. Specif­i­cal­ly Mail in Bal­lots how­ev­er this very flawed process con­tin­ues in the State even dur­ing the Recount of the Recount! Does that sound famil­iar? It should because this same thing was done in Flori­da dur­ing the 2000 elec­tion!

They were count­ing and c0unting and count­ing until they had enough votes.

But even more trou­bling here is the fact that there is evi­dence that the Domin­ion Vot­ing machines were not effec­tive in pre­vent­ing poten­tial fraud along with the abuse of author­i­ty and you have a recipe for a vot­ing sys­tem that will nev­er again be valid.

They have evi­dence that proves this and it is not only valid but also it is demon­stra­ble.

When you add all of this up what you get is what is assured­ly an unlaw­ful elec­tion and pos­si­ble crim­i­nal actions.

Should the peo­ple of the State of Geor­gia fail to receive appro­pri­ate relief from the judi­cial author­i­ties Nev­er again will elec­tions in this nation be safe from fraud and tam­per­ing.

When you see and hear politi­cians stand up and omit the most egre­gious vio­la­tions of the law from a state­ment they make that has to tell you that they know the truth but are choos­ing to omit the truth from what they are say­ing.

That is wrong in so many ways that it is lit­er­al­ly impos­si­ble to believe any­thing they say or to trust them to do their duty or per­form their oaths of office.

We know the truth!