Al Franken repeals first amendment?

Ok, well we know that sometimes people get into office that have no real business or experience in governing and serving the people.

This is the case here, now America can send a message to liberals in congress that attempt to try to silence American Voices.


Liberal Senator Al Franken is trying to repeal the First Amendment- and if he is re-elected in November, he could get his way.

You see, the leftist Senator from Minnesota not only wants to repeal the First Amendment, but he specifically wants to stop your ability to campaign against him- virtually guaranteeing his re-election.

That’s right– Senator Al Franken is abusing his political power to silence you and me. And if he is successful, this could be the last time you have the ability to effectively campaign against liberal politicians who abuse and restrict your freedoms.

That’s why we must stop him today.

Let me explain.

My name is Shaun McCutcheon, and I took on one of the biggest federal bureaucracies- the FEC- over their restrictive campaign finance laws that only serve to protect liberal incumbents like Al Franken and the DC establishment.

In the end, the Supreme Court ruled in my favor in what many now consider a landmark case for free speech.

Now, Al Franken and his liberal allies want to take away our victory by REPEALING THE FIRST AMENDMENT and replacing it with a new amendment that will strip YOUR freedom of political speech.

Franken’s dirty scheme is to limit your ability to support the candidates of your choice – protecting the entrenched liberal establishment.

That’s why I’m writing you today.

You see, we can defeat Al Franken this year and end his assault on the First Amendment. 

Tim– I’m ready to fight Al Franken tooth and nail. I have even personally donated $1,776 to his opponent, Mike McFadden. However, I know my donation alone cannot defeat Al Franken.

That’s why the Conservative Action Fund is entering the fight to defeat Al Franken, and it’s absolutely critical you join with us.

Will you please sign the Conservative Action Fund’s pledge to preserve the First Amendment and defeat Al Franken? I need you to do so immediately. And after you sign – please make a contribution of $25, $50 or even $100 to help the Conservative Action Fund defeat Al Franken. 

I need your signature today to show Al Franken and his liberal allies there is a massive grassroots army that stands ready to do whatever it takes to defeat anti-freedom liberals.

Why Al Franken? Al Franken, along with Nancy Pelosi, is leading the charge to restrict our freedom of speech in the wake of the Supreme Court decision. If we work together to defeat Al Franken, we will deal a crushing blow to this anti-free speech movement.

Here’s the good news!

After nearly six years as a United States Senator, voters are signaling they want a change. The most recent poll has Senator Franken only ahead by 6 points – and well below 50%.

That’s why your signed pledge and donation is so important. With your help, we can defeat Franken – but only if we start building our grassroots army today.

Defeating Al Franken will send shockwaves through the D.C. liberal establishment.

So will you click here to add your name the Conservative Action Fund’s pledge to defend the First Amendment and defeat Al Franken? Help me send the message we will not let this anti-freedom Senator spend another day in the Senate.

Tim- when members of Congress pledge to uphold the Constitution, they take a pledge to uphold the ENTIRE Constitution, not just the parts they agree with.

When Al Franken and his liberal friends start trying to amend the Constitution — to protect their political power — you know we must stop them before they succeed.

The fight for our freedom starts with signing the Conservative Action Fund’s pledge to defend the First Amendment and defeat Al Franken today. The next step is to make a generous donation of $50 if you can afford it – but at least $5 or $10 if $50 is too much.

With the support from thousands of freedom loving Americans, I am confident we will defeat Al Franken and put a stop to the latest liberal effort to take our freedoms away by halting their attempt to repeal the First Amendment.

We at The Conservative Action Fund are working tirelessly to defeat Al Franken, but our success depends on your help.

So please immediately sign your personalized pledge to defend the First Amendment and defeat Al Franken and consider making a donation of $25, $50, $100 or more to help us defeat this out of touch liberal. 

For Freedom,

Shaun McCutcheon

Chairman, Conservative Action Fund

P.S. The Conservative Action Fund will not stand by while Al Franken leads the effort to strip away our Constitutionally guaranteed freedom of speech. Please take a minute to sign your personalized pledge to defend the First Amendment and defeat Al Franken and make an important contribution to help us get the job done. 

Paid for by the Converative Action Fund


Democrats want to repeal the first amendment

This is Amazing and it is true…

41 democrats have decided to repeal the First Amendment.



Freedom of Speech

The freedom of Speech is under attack in Congress.

Guess who is behind this?


Is that what America is about?

Shutting up someone you do not agree with?

no more freedom of speech

No more free speech look out code pink

A new bill makes it a Felony for protesting…

First Amendment, AMazing, folks. You will not believe this.

2014 vote them out Politics

Free Speech?

Do we now live in a country where we are no longer allowed to speak freely?

What do they fear?

Why do they do this?

When will these people be removed from positions of responsibility?


free press no more?

Is this the end of the press as we know it or are we about to see what has happened in places where there is no more freedom of speech. These are the places where crime just happens and no one ever does anything to stop it. These are the towns where no one is free to have a news stand any more…

No place to be free…

No more Churches…

No more Parks for kids to play…

The most difficult thing is that we all know where this leads when you can no longer speak the truth because you are afraid that someone will come along and take your life then the very thing you think is important today will loose its splendor in the cold light of dawn.

A Fox News correspondent was accused in a Justice Department affidavit of being a possible criminal “co-conspirator” for his alleged role in publishing sensitive security information — in a leak case that takes the highly unusual step of claiming a journalist broke the law.

The case has also caught the attention of Congress. Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said in a statement Monday he was “very concerned” about the reports of “possible criminal prosecution for doing what appears to be normal news-gathering protected by the First Amendment.” 


Oh Lucy, dont move that football…

Well, remember the old cartoons you used to watch and you would see Charlie Brown, fall for it over and over again, well that is sort of like what we have seen in the election cycles recently, with regard to how the media have been playing games with our elections.

Yes it should be the elections of the People…

But the Media have been working to deny the process and side with one candidate over another.

They have been allowed to get away with it with no punishment, because of the first Amendment, which ironically those same people despise.


Protests, Tshirts and the American Way

[kc_background_pac_1_heading_12]Congress is Missing
in Action,
Where are our Leaders…[/kc_background_pac_1_heading_12]

The United States is on the brink of financial ruin, the dollar is worth less than it was in 2001, more than 24 Million Americans are unable or unwilling to find a job.

We live in a nation where on average there are more murders in our largest cities, than there are on the battlefield in foreign wars.

We are facing the most difficult social and financial situations this nation has ever faced and the news story below, is what congress thinks is the most important thing.

America are you not proud? 

Where have we found our courage?

Perhaps it is time to begin to Recall Senators, Congressman who will not do their duty as prescribed by the
constitution of these United States of America.

Voters, what were you thinking in when you put people like Harry Reid who has betrayed his own party (allegedly) and the people of the United States.

I find it appalling disgusting and evil what the congress thinks is the way to deal with our problems is to make it a felony to protest after allowing the occupy wall-street movement to do what ever they wanted to do but now they want to make it a felony to wear a T shirt that may offend someone?


The following News story was sent to us by email, we are providing coverage of this news story included below, the source is

I find it not only Amazing that congress is so far gone that they are unable to see what is happening in our own nation because allegedly they are so busy amassing wealth that the rest of us will never have the opportunity to achieve, but they want to oppress and to create a nation of slaves.

Imagine an America in which the government can deny protest in any public space it deems fit. Where wearing a dissenting shirt around an elected official could be construed as a felony. Where First-Amendment protections become privileges subjectively doled out by the state. Sadly, that America is pretty much here.

In March, Congress passed HR 347, a bill that limits Americans’ ability to protest in public and on government grounds. Mainstream media didn’t raise peep, but now there’s finally some anger building. The bill, passed almost unanimously, makes it a federal offense punishable by up to ten years in prison to “knowingly” protest in the vicinity of the Secret Service–that is anywhere the Secret Service “is or will be temporarily visiting.”

It also makes many public events impervious to lawful protest. Any “National Security Special Event” (NSSE) requires Secret Service protection. NSSE-designated events have proliferated since 9/11 to include Super Bowls, concerts, campaign events, and now any public event that Very Important People want protest-free.

Most dangerously, it criminalizes protest. Under the bill, “disorderly or disruptive conduct” or activities that “impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions” could warrant felony charges. What constitutes such “disruptive conduct” rests in the eye of the beholder–or the eye of Eric Holder. To put it plainly: the government can decide where and when free speech is allowed and severely prosecute any “disruptive” activity, while we’re confined to “free speech zones.” We can help fix it, however! Join our petition below to protect our speech rights!

PETITION TO CONGRESS: We treasure our first amendment rights of free speech and public assembly! HR 347 limits valid arenas of peaceful public protest, and broadens the government’s ability to curtail civil liberties. We demand that Congress amend the bill to provide clearer language as to what constitutes “disruptions”; to allow for reasonable, peaceful protest at NSSEs and around Secret Service; and to ensure that no peaceful protest can ever be deemed a felony.



the Myth of Seperation of Church and State

The American people have been lied to for many years…

No where in the Constitution does it allow Christians to be persecuted like they are these days.

No where in the Constitution does it allow Atheists to have a religion, (Atheism) protected by the Government, If a Cross represents and or depicts an establishment, of a religion then the lack of a Cross
at a Grave, deprives a Christian of the same.  

Can I saw that it is stupid to believe that Christianity was not already an established religion before the Constitution was written.   Yes, you hear correctly, Establish, means To set up, to create, to ensure or to otherwise generate and fabricate. 

How can you create what has already been created.  This nation was created, established as a nation of believers, who are free to pursue their own brand of beliefs including religion, this includes the lack of a religion which itself is a religion, and why not, who else would put such energy into fighting God but someone that was a believer in non-belief.  As such non-belief, or the pursuit of Atheism, must be a religion just as the worship of any person or non person would be respected as a religion.  Under the constitution they are free to believe or not to believe they are free to believe in any prophet, or personage they wish.

Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting
the free exercise thereof…

One thing seems clear prohibiting, the free exercise of religion
is a violation and when you start to say that you can no longer
display a Christmas tree, in public, is that not prohibiting the free exercise of religion?

This idea that the separation of Church and State requires that the government must interfere with every single interpretation of any prayer, or any other liberty this is just insanity.


The plain language shows that the First Amendment restricts only Congress’ powers!

The People of the States are free to establish (or dis-establish) any religion they want – this is one of the powers retained by the States or the People!  Several States did retain their established religions after ratification of the U.S. Constitution in 1789.  We saw that in 1807, Presbyterians in Chester, N.H. sold a Quaker’s cow for non-payment of the Minister’s Tax.  Not until the Toleration Act of 1819 did the Legislature of N.H. make it illegal for towns, as corporate bodies, to raise money for the support of the gospel. Connecticut did not dis-establish the Congregational Church until they adopted their Constitution of 1818 (see Article Seventh). Massachusetts did not dis-establish the Congregational Church until 1833.


Censorship by Democrats?

NY State Senators Say

We’ve Got Too Much

Free Speech; Introduce Bill To Fix That

Ok is this even true?

Because if it is, this is just becoming too scary for those of us that value America as it was and as it should be and as it still exists in our hearts and minds, but apparently a group of NY, Senators, (Big Surprise there) after watching Anthony Wieners, antics, and some of the other truly remarkable idiots, they produce, come out from under the rocks they hide under, to engage in this kind of evil you have to wonder if there will be an America for our children.

All I can say, about this news story is that it is an indication that they need to be voted out of office.

from the i-find-this-offensive dept source,

We’ve been pointing out a variety of attempts to push back on the First Amendment lately. One fertile ground for such attacks are local politicians carrying the “cyberbullying” banner, in various attempts to magically outlaw being a “jerk” online, usually by making it illegal to offend someone online. Of course, making someone’s action illegal based on how someone else feels about it is all kinds of crazy. It also would seem to violate the very principles of the First Amendment, which bar Congress (and local governments) from passing any laws that take away one’s right to free speech.


This is incredible, makes you want to think about “NOT” living in New York, because some day they may show up at your door with a muzzle, what a mess, this is, horrible when you consider what they are trying to use as a vehicle to limit free speech, soon they will pass a law saying that if you offend someone you might be jailed for it.

Even more offensive is this.

In the past, lawmakers pushing these laws have tended to simply ignore the First Amendment issue, and focus on screaming “protect the children!” as loudly as possible (never mind the fact that kids seem much less concerned about “bullying” than all these adults seem to think). However, it appears that some state Senators in NY are trying a new line of attack: going directly after the First Amendment and suggesting that current interpretations are way too broad, and it’s not really meant to protect any sort of free speech right. In fact, it sounds as though they’re trying to redefine the right to free speech into a privilege that can be taken away. Seriously: