Opiate Madness

Remem­ber the clas­sic black and white polit­i­cal movie that was designed to brain wash view­ers int0 believ­ing that tak­ing a drug would turn you into a zom­bie?

Yep, well that same issue is back again only this time it is a pack of lies and it has been exposed as the lie it is.

Opioid Madness…

The truth about pro­pa­gan­da and the way the CDC is using the term Opi­oid to induce a mass hys­te­ria event in the pre­scrip­tion use of med­ica­tions.

Imag­ine what would hap­pen if you found out that pre­scrip­tion med­ica­tions did not in fact kill 42,000 peo­ple a year as the CDC is pub­lish­ing in decep­tive adver­tis­ing.

source

“In 2016, 63,632 per­sons died of a drug over­dose in the Unit­ed States; 66.4% (42,249) involved an opi­oid.”

Why do I sus­pect that the CDC would be absolute­ly glee­ful if reporters read only the first sen­tence and then wrote their same old crap? After all, it is much eas­i­er than actu­al­ly read­ing the paper and see­ing what’s real­ly in there. But if you both­er to read it it does­n’t take long until the fun­ny busi­ness starts.

First, the authors state that there are (at least) two ways to count opi­oid deaths. And the CDC has been doing it wrong (empha­sis mine):

Tra­di­tion­al­ly, the Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol and Pre­ven­tion (CDC) and oth­ers have includ­ed syn­thet­ic opi­oid deaths in esti­mates of “pre­scrip­tion” opi­oid deaths. How­ev­er, with [fen­tanyl] like­ly being involved more recent­ly, esti­mat­ing pre­scrip­tion opioid–involved deaths with the inclu­sion of syn­thet­ic opi­oid– involved deaths could sig­nif­i­cant­ly inflate esti­mates.

Shock­ing! Except that I have writ­ten numer­ous pieces (1) which con­clude exact­ly this: By com­bin­ing fen­tanyl deaths with those from pre­scrip­tion drugs it  auto­mat­i­cal­ly skews the results. The stats from the CDC have been BS all along. They are now sheep­ish­ly admit­ting it, but not until the BS num­bers were already used to for­mu­late the god-awful pol­i­cy which is now plagu­ing mil­lions of us. All based on a bunch of lies.

It does­n’t take long to find data in the arti­cle that makes the CDC and its flunkies (2) look pret­ty bad. Let’s start with Table 1. The cen­ter col­umn (green cir­cle and arrow) rep­re­sents the “tra­di­tion­al” method that the CDC used to count deaths. Note that the num­ber dou­bled between 2013 and 2016. Those damn pills are stone cold killers, just like we’ve been told all along, right? No. Not right.

The oth­er columns tell us why. The left col­umn (blue) rep­re­sents the num­ber of deaths when the “con­ser­v­a­tive def­i­n­i­tion” (make that “cor­rect def­i­n­i­tion”) is used. The data in this col­umn no longer includes deaths from “fen­tanyl” (“fen­tanyl” in this instance mean­ing illic­it fen­tanyl and its analogs — syn­the­sized in Chi­nese labs, not phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal fen­tanyl). Once “fen­tanyl” (red col­umn) is removed from a cat­e­go­ry in which it should nev­er have been in in the first place, all of a sud­den, the num­ber of deaths drops by half. That lit­tle “a” has a big mean­ing. This “a” explains why fen­tanyl is erro­neous­ly lumped in with the oth­ers.

So in real­i­ty we have a dan­ger­ous sit­u­a­tion here where the CDC has clear­ly blurred the lines and then failed to pub­lish a retrac­tion.

They cooked the books and that is wrong in so many ways.

We have a sit­u­a­tion here where a pub­licly and pri­vate­ly fund­ed enti­ty is cre­at­ing a cri­sis that is fun­da­men­tal­ly incor­rect on the facts and they do not pub­licly admit that they were wrong?