Where is the Science?

We have seen a lot of dif­fer­ent types of infor­ma­tion that has been prof­fered up by the Media and by the Social Media…

Often if you are actu­al­ly pay­ing atten­tion to what is being said you will begin to see a pat­tern.

That pat­tern can be some­what dis­turb­ing if and when you begin to exam­ine what the Media are actu­al­ly say­ing.

When you see a report most of the time there is no evi­dence that accom­pa­nies the infor­ma­tion that the media are say­ing is the truth.

In fact if you search on Google you will see hun­dreds of web­sites that are devot­ed to telling you why what they are say­ing is true and what oth­ers say is not truth.

Have you noticed that?

Anoth­er sit­u­a­tion is that you will often see one doc­tor that the Media have picked to be the “poster child” for the point of view that they want to tell you is true.

So, you see a doc­tor on TV telling you using cer­tain words that what they say is true and what oth­ers say is not true…

What is miss­ing here?

The Sci­ence that is what is miss­ing.

Even in high school and in col­leges stu­dents see at least some of the sci­ence behind biol­o­gy and human phys­i­ol­o­gy.

It would in fact be impos­si­ble to leave that out of the teach­ing process and still have a stu­dent that would be capa­ble of pro­vid­ing ser­vices as a doc­tor or health care provider in the future.

So, what should the aver­age per­son do when it comes to dis­cov­er­ing what is true and what is opin­ion and what is sim­ply just polit­i­cal­ly inspired non­sense.

Look for the Sci­ence.

What is the num­ber one thing that is miss­ing from all of these reports about the Pan­dem­ic?

You might be scratch­ing your head right now but believe it there is some­thing that is extreme­ly impor­tant that is total­ly miss­ing from the point of view or opin­ion of most of the media right now.

The Fact that Nat­ur­al Immu­ni­ty is still the best defence against any viral pathol­o­gy to the body.

In fact the biggest world wide pan­dem­ic began short­ly before 1918 and was respon­si­ble for more than 50 mil­lion world wide deaths, (esti­mat­ed) some say it was more than that.

Sci­en­tists esti­mate that 33 per­cent of the Pop­u­la­tion became infect­ed.

There was a high mor­tal­i­ty rate.

The exact rate is debat­able more so among sci­en­tists.

How­ev­er some­where between 1.9 and 2.6 appears to be what most sci­en­tists believe is close to accu­rate with the aver­age being 2.5 per­cent.

Now those sta­tis­tics would seem to be quite hor­ri­ble and it was cer­tain­ly very bad indeed how­ev­er What if you look at it dif­fer­ent­ly.

IF 33 per­cent of the pop­u­la­tion was infect­ed.

That means that 67 per­cent of the pop­u­la­tion either did not con­tract the ill­ness or they had such a mild case that the ques­tion of nat­ur­al immu­ni­ty has to be dis­cussed as a con­di­tion­al rem­e­dy that even­tu­al­ly reduced the effi­ca­cy of the virus.

So of the 33 per­cent of the pop­u­la­tion that did have a severe ill­ness or mod­er­ate­ly severe rough­ly 2.5 per­cent of those peo­ple died.

Add those up …

Yes, check it to see if you have it right, well wait.

30.5 per­cent sur­vived.

plus 67 per­cent…

That means that in the three years of the Span­ish Flu Pan­dem­ic.

97.5 Per­cent of all per­sons on the plan­et Sur­vived.

97.5%

This was what many sci­en­tists refer to as the moth­er of all pan­demics.

The most dead­ly.

The most vir­u­lent.

Peo­ple either got it or they did not and it did not mat­ter how many wore masks.

It did not mat­ter how many hid out in the base­ment or the Attic.

They either got it or they did not.

What is being left out of the Opin­ions that you see on TV now is that like the 1918 pan­dem­ic peo­ple are get­ting it even if they have had the vac­cine.

Even if they wear a mask every­where.

Even if they hid in their base­ment or attic.

Are you begin­ning to see what this tells us about how Sci­ence is being left out of the equa­tion by the Media?

By all the mea­sur­able sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence the cur­rent “pan­dem­ic” is not as bad as the 1918 pan­dem­ic.

In fact the sur­vival rate is high­er than in 1918.

Anoth­er thing to con­sid­er here is the fact that in 1918 there was no vac­cine.

None, NADA, Noth­ing.

What this means is that Nat­ur­al Immu­ni­ty is still the best sci­ence based out­come that we have in terms of study and preva­lence.

Nat­u­ral­ly no one wants to be part of the per­cent­age of peo­ple who die.

But with an acknowl­edged sur­vival rate of between
98.6 and 99.75

The mor­tal­i­ty rate is quite low.

In many cas­es it is less than three tenths of one per­cent.

0.25 percent.

This is what one per­cent looks like.

1.0 percent

Yes, it is ter­ri­ble that so many have lost their lives and most peo­ple by now know some­one or know of a friend of some­one that has died because of this pan­dem­ic.

How­ev­er it is also impor­tant to look at the sci­ence and to under­stand that when the media fail to show you the truth they are not doing so because they love you.

Nev­er in his­to­ry med­ical or sci­ence or sta­tis­ti­cal­ly has there been an attempt to force peo­ple to be vac­ci­nat­ed.

There is a rea­son why this is impor­tant.

Even with the polio vac­cine the lev­el of vac­ci­nat­ed nev­er reached any­where near 100 per­cent.

Sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly speak­ing to attempt to force 100 per­cent of the pop­u­la­tion to be vac­ci­nat­ed when over 90 per­cent of that pop­u­la­tion is nat­u­ral­ly immune would be the great­est sci­en­tif­ic stu­pid­i­ty in his­to­ry.

This is what hap­pens when the often clue­less and une­d­u­cat­ed media begin to try to lie to you about every­thing to fur­ther an agen­da that only they know about.

Do not let the miss­ing sci­ence mis­lead you into believ­ing a lie when the truth is so much bet­ter for you in the long run.

dis­claimer.

This pub­li­ca­tion is not against approved vac­ci­na­tion in those per­sons who need to be vac­ci­nat­ed using an approved (not exper­i­men­tal) vac­cine.

We are mere­ly point­ing out that per­sons with nat­ur­al immu­ni­ty do not need to be vac­ci­nat­ed.

In fact sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly speak­ing here.

IF 100 per­cent of the pop­u­la­tion were to be vac­ci­nat­ed.

Includ­ing those with the nat­ur­al immu­ni­ty.

The result could be extreme­ly bad for the future of a virus where the nat­ur­al immune fac­tor were removed from the equa­tion.

Back to 1918 for a moment.

Today we have evi­dence that nat­ur­al immu­ni­ty lead to a reduc­tion of mor­tal­i­ty in all future cas­es of the flu.

Even­tu­al­ly lead­ing to the flu being very much less dead­ly that is was in 1918.

What might hap­pen if that nat­ur­al immu­ni­ty were removed arti­fi­cial­ly.

You might see a 70 per­cent infec­tion rate with a 5 to 12 per­cent mor­tal­i­ty rate. It could very well be even high­er…

Does that sound like a good idea to any­one?

Think about it because the more you know…

The less you fear.