Categories
Politics

Facebook Filth

IF you have spent any time on face book you cannot miss the Tons of advertising that is incorporated in many different parts of the website and for good reason, Facebook earns Billions of dollars in revenue from that advertising…

But along with the mostly good content at Facebook there are a few Rotten Apples…

Most notably, (Rotten Apple variety) is this particular page which seems to promote a rather Evil and intentionally inhumane level of profane treatment of other groups which this particular facebook page disagrees with either intellectually or personally either way it does not belong on Facebook at all.

[kc_heading_pac_1_headline_sub size=”50″ color=”#000″ ]Facebook Trash..[/kc_heading_pac_1_headline_sub]

You could say Free Speech, but actually this stuff is pretty offensive to just about anyone that looks at it, in fact were not going to link to it from this post but if you want to have a look at the junk that Facebook is allowing these days, then be our quest, you may find it harmless (but we doubt it)

The central theme here is that this (person) (if they be included in the human race at all) sets about to bully anyone they feel has a viewpoint other than what they would like to see online, no mention of his or her own view be respected, they just don’t want your view respected.

This post is continued here.

The reason why were posting this is for two very good reasons, one because Facebook should take action to protect both its visitors and its advertisers, we feel its a good idea to take some action that would tend to result in condemning this kind of Anti Free Speech behavior, where using Bully style psychological tactic’s, to silence discussion on any items this poster feels he or she does not want to see posted online.

Fair warning this poster uses images, that are cruel, Evil, Profane, (using profanity, vulgar language, calling others names, and even more disgusting things)

In posts at this persons page, you can and should report them as being (the most disquieting trash you have ever seen on Facebook)

If you choose to view this content fair warning it is horrible, if you are a person who has beliefs of any kind regarding a higher power, this will offend you, but I think it is important to push back against these kinds of anti free speech actions that facebook is allowing.

Learn more about what kind of trash facebook allows in the name of freedom versus bullying…

This guy is a bully….  It should not be….

 

 

Categories
Politics

No more Free Speech

[kc_heading_pac_6_headline_1 size=”50″ color=”#cc0000″ ]Chick Fil A..[/kc_heading_pac_6_headline_1]

 

Who would have ever thought that the champions for freedom of Speech would one day deny that same right to everyone…

If your like a lot of people your sitting there right now with your mouth hanging open…

Your sitting there and your thinking what are they talking about, the sad thing here is that when good people sit there and allow the evil people of this world to silence or attempt to silence people with intimidation and with violence it is something that must be stopped, by voting, by law and by supporting the right people for political office, because if you do nothing but sit on your couch and watch the election coverage you will be waiting a long time for your freedoms.

 [kc_heading_pac_7_headline_sub_2 size=”50″ color=”#000000″ ]Shut up

You cant speak..[/kc_heading_pac_7_headline_sub_2]

 You probably wonder who would ever try to silence everyone in the world who has a different viewpoint?

   Be quiet what you have to say is not allowed…

Who would ever act in such a way as to oppress and to try to force the world to view everything in one viewpoint, your welcome to have an opinion as long as it is an opinion that does not contradict, the view that is the popular one usually shared by the media.

 What kind of a world would we live in if no one were allowed to think if no one were allowed to consider a different color, what if no one were allowed to own a car that was different than anyone else…

 

Sounds crazy right, but what if, only grey cars were allowed to be sold because someone who may have felt badly because they could not afford a fancy sports car or a red car or a blue car, what if we made a rule that only one kind of thought would be accepted.

 

 

Categories
Politics

slipped through the cracks

Is it possible that the Gunman in the Colorado Massacre was not properly treated for a serious mental illness?

In a news story out of Fox News Company the medical record of this doctor could be suspect in some serious ways.

WAS Psychiatrist Lynne Fenton treating Colorado movie massacre suspect James Holmes.
Did she make a mistake?  Should she have hospitalized him?  The answer now is obviously yes and yes and yes.

But was this a preventable situation, I think the answer has to be yes, though it is so easy to say it from this viewpoint you have to think that if this patient had been treated by a more professional and perhaps even “Board Certified” doctor the end result may have been very different, of course this does not excuse any human being from the personal responsibility of exercising good judgement and seeking help before something like this becomes a problem.

Over all the answers may never be known one thing for sure as long as we have marginal doctors that should not be practicing medicine for critical patients, we will face the possibility of having these problems over and over again.

The thing to do now is to find out how to identify these high risk patients and take the appropriate action to prevent these horrible outcomes.

 Reading about the potential for the treating physician may have dropped the ball is convenient but is it accurate we really do not know the full extent of this situation it might be that she did try to help him but he did not come to his appointments on a regular basis, of course its so easy to sit back on the couch and judge the results still it makes you wonder if the man had sought more qualified and professional help would we even be reading this story today?

We really do need to begin to better asses the risk involved in human behavior, considering this took place over a period of several months, there were likely many signs that something was wrong, from the purchase of ammunition to guns, to all kinds of different things in-between, you would think that someone along the line would have taken the steps of reporting this to the police so it could be investigated.

If it turned out to be nothing you did what you could do, but in this case it turned out to be a serious problem that no one took action on, from the shooting club, to gun dealers, to doctors, no one did the right thing, how could that happen?

Once we learn how to identify how to stop these situations from occurring and how to manage our actions better we might find that saving lives becomes a lot easier.

Until that time we may find that the answers are still waiting to be found, however it appears that at least several opportunities were lost to prevent this crime and that is something that will haunt the dreams of those involved for many years to come.

 
Categories
Politics

megyn kelly Biased?

Is megyn kelly a biased bobble headed blond?

Now normally we like Megyn but today she came out with a hacket job on the girl that
trusted her to do an interview, that should have been free of bias.

However, it appears to be somewhat of a problem, because there was an omission of facts and even in some cases visual deception.  Now I worry about this kind of what they used to call Yellow Journalism.

I worry about it because it is not fair in its presentation to show a prescription bottle and then not disclaim that the image of the prescription and the dosage depicted may not have been accurate or even indicative of the dosage that this woman was taking.

This story was of course about the missing baby and the mother of that child, which has received national attention.  There was also a doctor that was present that made some inflammatory statements, that are not logical nor backed up by fact,

(should I call this doctor an alleged liar?)

I could, because he made some statements that allegedly were inconsistent, with the facts.

Now, the question now becomes did this doctor do this because a producer at fox news arranged for this doctor to present a certain viewpoint?  It is possible, considering how they
presented the news story in the first place.

The first thing that should be corrected about this news story is that Effexor is a brand name of a drug not a drug itself.  This should have been made abundantly clear and I am
frankly disappointment in Megyn Kelly for not being through on this front.

The drug is venlafaxine HCl This drug is in a class of many different brands of drugs, many of them have several different uses depending on what your doctor prescribes them for, in some cases, this drug can even be used to treat brain damage and head injuries.

 So the drug is an serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) class

It is not an evil drug, likely it has nothing to do with the story in this case, they have presented a situation by using a doctor to allegedly distort the true facts in this story to insinuate certain ideas into the minds of the public, I think this is a sad situation and should it prove that Megyn Kelly was being dishonest in the presentation of this news story I think she should apologize to this young woman.

It is a shame on Fox news and a shame on the profession of being a journalistic professional and I have lost all respect for Megyn Kelly because of this use of alleged Yellow Journalism.

There are millions of people taking this drug and it is unfair to characterize this drug in this way, using a news story to bend the facts to suit your alleged pre conceived assumptions is a sory scum bucket thing to do, you should be ashamed of your self Megyn this is unprofessional and soon if you dont watch what your doing you will be (allegedly) as bad as Jennine pirro, jumping into a news story with no facts at all.

Categories
Politics

Polls are they accurate?

Polls can you ever really be sure that they are even scientific at all?

Subjective data can never be trusted as valid?

When you think about it, what they are doing is rife for subjective analysis, it reeks in many ways of impure science that is often portrayed by the media as some kind of holy grail of political correctness when in reality it is hardly accurate at all.

We see polls here and Polls there, one poll contradicts another, and no one ever seems to cover the disparity…

We are always see these polls being presented by the media as some kind of predictive method that is so right that they have to design a mathematical plus or minus sign next to the figures they “come up with” the thing is are these “polls accurate at all”

 Are polls biased?

This morning some poll or another, was released, that showed, that a certain percent of a certain percent, of some people that might vote or might not vote in the next election, have some kind of negative view of the tea party.

How do they come up with those figures, are those methods really reliable?

Scientific analysis, or scientific sampling, is a process where you attempt to “sample” a group of Americans, (some of which might or might not be here legally) and you try to get some kind of information from them, however, where do they live and do they live in a particular area where one viewpoint might be held over another, and is that process fair?

The idea that someone who wanted to project a particular method they know would get the result they wanted, is really a little suspect. When you look at that situation it is fraught with dangers, in subjective analysis, that process is not really scientific, the numbers they come up with may be scientific, but the process and the method they use, may not be subjective at all. So when you see it on TV, and they say this is the latest poll, what are they really saying? This might be very subjective, it might even be biased, (allegedly) it might not be really even accurate at all?

Are they saying that the stature of liberty was really made by aliens from outer space? Are they saying that the Ghost busters, are going to be repairing the statue of liberty? Are they saying that in some universe that we are yet unaware of that the social ramifications of Goldilocks and the three bears is somehow a topic of interest to some strange alter ego? Sounds crazy right, like some kind of yellow journalism or some kind of strange tabloid headline. The funny thing here is that you could get some kind of poll numbers on any of those strange subjects, above, are they really important at all? Not really, simply the thing here is that polls do not really reflect the American public, because the sampling is too low and it is not widely dispersed, and it is not done in an objective manner.

Yet, you see this morning on the Today show, a tag line saying “allegedly” Tea party, the politics of Anger? This is the kind of biased journalism that many have come to expect what would those people do if somehow CNN started actually reporting the news what would happen then? Would pigs fly? Perhaps, because that may be what it takes to get some of these allegedly very biased news or entertainment companies to do the right thing and start reporting again…

Until then hope you find a better method of getting your news, or you could just get it here, you will not find any yellow journalism here….

Categories
Politics

biased CNN debate tonight

Well time for CNN to have yet allegedly another biased news media event
where  they may be likely to ask questions that are unfair and biased in
nature.

You just have to wonder in part why put up with a news company that
is not really a news company at all?

You have to wonder when you see these questions from these liberals.

They ask questions based on emotion, not fact, they ask questions that
they do not want to answer if the shoe were on the other foot they would
say that it was racist to ask questions like that.

They will say all kinds of things that make no sense at all.

They have an agenda, to try to make the debaters look bad and to attack each other.
They try to phrase a question where there is only one outcome to that question, the
answer they want to hear, and that may not be the truth at all.

It is a problem when the news is no longer the news.

In some ways there has been a call for some of these so called news companies that are
so far left or right for that matter that they should not be afforded the right to broadcast.

That is a little extreme, however if you have a news company that distorts the truth and
you have a news company that attempts to taint the news in its own image then that is
a real issue that perhaps we should discuss.

Cnn tonight will be doing the moderation, now to make it fair they should have at
least one moderator for each viewpoint, but that is not the way that they usually operate.
most of the time they are sneaky, (allegedly)

Most of the time they try to carefully word their questions where they can come up
with the now famous or infamous analogy of the “Gotcha” Question.

This does no one any good and it is also not news worthy.

In the old days this would have been considered unprofessional and it would have been
considered stupid. 

These days we have to put up with CNN or Do we?

Do we really have to put up with the biased and ugly (allegedly) coverage that CNN often
attempts to use words that are weighted to try and to create a certain impression when
one does not really exist.

They often say things that are not true, and then they try to hide that fact by using
confusing narratives, that can be misunderstood or even intentionally vague so that
they can then follow up with another “gotcha” question, while this might be entertainment for some of these liberals in the News media it is insulting to most clear thinking Americans.

So while some may think that watching a biased news company attempting to pursue
its own agenda at the expense of the public entertainment, we dont see it that way.

 

 

Categories
Politics

Biased Elections

Over the last several years we have seen a trend in the media that creates a problem in the electoral process.

Consider this, the media can influence the outcome of an election because of how they choose to cover that election and the candidates that are running in that election. 

If only one viewpoint is presented is it then a fair contest?

Can we have legal elections if the media influences the outcome of an election by using psychological tactics to promote one candidate over another one, even perhaps promote one candidate that cannot win and then later turn on that same candidate and influence the voting public yet again, they might even be able to profit from this process.

The real question then becomes “should the media be directly involved in influencing elections?”

Should the media be accepting advertising dollars from corporate clients that have a direct interest in the outcome of an election?

When this happens, you have some real conflict of interest that might even be close to being a crime…

When you think about how often this happens, and how opinion then becomes a powerful psychological tool to help produce results and influence the outcome of an election then you have to ask the question should a law be passed to prevent the media from participating in an election by using psychological phrases and depicting a candidate in one way or another to attempt to influence that election process.

A great example occurred on Fox news just recently, when a bobble head, made a statement to the effect that a particular candidate might have not been telling the truth during a debate, now there was no direct evidence that this comment was true, however this bobble head, made the statement anyway even though they had no method of proving what they said, the problem was that the net result was that this bobble head created doubt in the minds of the viewing and voting public.

This “Bobble Head” caused an event to take place that cast doubt on this candidates ability to get elected, now that is interfering with an election.

This candidate may not be able to win votes, in the future because this media figure used psychological tricks to develop a doubt about this candidates ability to win an election, now that is just wrong, and this happened on Fox news, so perhaps it might be accurate to say that a media organization that participates unfairly in an election in this manner should be shut down because they have ceased to be a news company and have become instead an unauthorized participant in the election.

For years the media has been doing this type of thing and for the most part, they have gotten away with it, but it may be time to start a process to refute this practice and stop them from attempting to influence the American Electoral process.

The media should report the news.

The media should not make the news.

The Media should develop good reporting practices.

The media should not develop opinions with the intent to influence the way voters see any particular candidate.

People are not anywhere near as dumb as companies like Fox news think that they are and so it is time for the media to report the news and stop trying to derail a candidate based on opinion alone that is wrong and a law should be passed to prevent the media from making a profit when they do this, in fact they should be fined a big big fine, (more than they take in for advertising for that same time period) that would stop this insanity and create a real election again, because we have not had a fair election in a long long time.

It is time for the news media to step back from the brink of insanity.

As anyone will tell you when you actively engage in deception using psychology in this way, the result is insanity and it is wrong.

Advertisers, can no longer be allowed to pay a news company to influence the news that is just wrong, and it is evil.

Fox news is just as guilty as many of these other news companies have been in the past, and that is just as wrong as what these other so called news companies are doing now, when a so called “reporter” fails to report the news or fails to question a biased statement by a guest that is also wrong.

Two wrongs do not make a right, and it is time that the media “wake up” because this is not what classic journalism is about what the modern news media is all about is influencing elections, that is wrong, there is a difference between news, entertainment, and advertising, when a news company engages, in all three, and does not distinguish between these different methods of media, that is also wrong.

Bias in the media is a horrible thing because it take from citizens the right to make up their own minds, when bias rots the core of the media you cease to have a real reporting news company and you have a state run media, that is wrong.

The fact is that for more than 30 years the media has been doing this unquestioned, it is time that they stop doing this.

 

Categories
Aarp aclu acorn fox news Going to POT high gas holder

Fox news may not be so fair and ballanced?

Is Fox news really Fair?

Are they really Balanced, because often it looks more like entertainment than it does news.

Could the liberals be right about Fox not being a “real” news company?

or are they loosing touch with their viewers?

You see a lot of this negative talk, allegedly…

It really seems like fox seems to be moving more toward a more left of center approach, it seems strange.

Have you noticed that Fox over the last few months have been hiring talent away from other networks and that the prevailing viewpoint seems to be moving away from the fair and balanced moniker that earned the network a lions share in revenue and ratings.

However, it appears again allegedly that they may be shifting to the left, this would be a mistake, in fact it would probably mean the end of them as a broadcaster.

The idea that Fox news is really some fair and Ballanced, news media alternative, is just not as attractive as it once was, same thing with the WSJ, the circulation took off when they bought it but now it seems to be moving in the other direction, when with the liberal media figure out that you can drag a horse to water but you cant make them drink the koolaide, This alleged trend is disturbing and it sort of makes you wonder if perhaps it would be better to just get your news online, you never know you might actually get a dose of the truth for a change, one thing for sure, Fox news, could become the same old alleged, unbalanced and Biased news if they do not pay attention.

We are just Saying…

Also another issue is concerning Glenn Beck, and the refusal of Fox news to cover the event, that is very disturbing, you know it sort of just makes you want to turn the channel off and do something else, let the talking heads do what ever they want when they “Finally” realize that no one is watching them perhaps they will wise up, but sadly they probably will be just like all the other Biased media, Corrupt, unbalanced and UN hinged.

Categories
NPR NPR liberals NPR tax payers

NPR Are they biased?

Is NPR biased, because if they actually are biased in favor of liberal politics, should they be receiving public tax payer funds? This is a hard question, because after watching a few news items about the network that is funded by tax payer dollars, it appears that they have a lot of liberal politics and views, this is somewhat disturbing because at some point we have to ask what if liberal progressive view points some day is deemed as a religion.

You might be able to make the point that they have a very fixed point of view and that they will not change their minds, in fact they could be alleged to be very very biased and even perhaps somewhat allegedly dishonest, in the way they practice their religion.

I mean how do you define a religion, is religion not the worship of a God or God like entity, surely politics could fall into this place, more so when you consider that the view points differ from what we know of actual history.

If this is indeed the case then one might some day make an argument that they should not receive tax payer funds because of the separation of church and state.

Sounds crazy right?

Perhaps not, I mean liberals have used the separation of church and state to cover everything from harvesting peaches, to asking the lords prayer, over lunch.

So why not apply it equally to every single viewpoint that seems to be at times, excessive and biased.

Or would that be just a little over the top, I know one thing, the recent language and comparisons at NPR, were over the top allegedly.

So how about another view, sure why not, that is what America is all about right?

Biased Say it aint so...
Hard to imagine, even harder to watch...