megyn kelly Biased?

Is megyn kelly a biased bobble headed blond?

Now nor­mal­ly we like Meg­yn but today she came out with a hack­et job on the girl that
trust­ed her to do an inter­view, that should have been free of bias.

How­ev­er, it appears to be some­what of a prob­lem, because there was an omis­sion of facts and even in some cas­es visu­al decep­tion.  Now I wor­ry about this kind of what they used to call Yel­low Jour­nal­ism.

I wor­ry about it because it is not fair in its pre­sen­ta­tion to show a pre­scrip­tion bot­tle and then not dis­claim that the image of the pre­scrip­tion and the dosage depict­ed may not have been accu­rate or even indica­tive of the dosage that this woman was tak­ing.

This sto­ry was of course about the miss­ing baby and the moth­er of that child, which has received nation­al atten­tion.  There was also a doc­tor that was present that made some inflam­ma­to­ry state­ments, that are not log­i­cal nor backed up by fact,

(should I call this doc­tor an alleged liar?)

I could, because he made some state­ments that alleged­ly were incon­sis­tent, with the facts.

Now, the ques­tion now becomes did this doc­tor do this because a pro­duc­er at fox news arranged for this doc­tor to present a cer­tain view­point?  It is pos­si­ble, con­sid­er­ing how they
pre­sent­ed the news sto­ry in the first place.

The first thing that should be cor­rect­ed about this news sto­ry is that Effex­or is a brand name of a drug not a drug itself.  This should have been made abun­dant­ly clear and I am
frankly dis­ap­point­ment in Meg­yn Kel­ly for not being through on this front.

The drug is ven­lafax­ine HCl This drug is in a class of many dif­fer­ent brands of drugs, many of them have sev­er­al dif­fer­ent uses depend­ing on what your doc­tor pre­scribes them for, in some cas­es, this drug can even be used to treat brain dam­age and head injuries.

 So the drug is an sero­tonin-nor­ep­i­neph­rine reup­take inhibitor (SNRI) class

It is not an evil drug, like­ly it has noth­ing to do with the sto­ry in this case, they have pre­sent­ed a sit­u­a­tion by using a doc­tor to alleged­ly dis­tort the true facts in this sto­ry to insin­u­ate cer­tain ideas into the minds of the pub­lic, I think this is a sad sit­u­a­tion and should it prove that Meg­yn Kel­ly was being dis­hon­est in the pre­sen­ta­tion of this news sto­ry I think she should apol­o­gize to this young woman.

It is a shame on Fox news and a shame on the pro­fes­sion of being a jour­nal­is­tic pro­fes­sion­al and I have lost all respect for Meg­yn Kel­ly because of this use of alleged Yel­low Jour­nal­ism.

There are mil­lions of peo­ple tak­ing this drug and it is unfair to char­ac­ter­ize this drug in this way, using a news sto­ry to bend the facts to suit your alleged pre con­ceived assump­tions is a sory scum buck­et thing to do, you should be ashamed of your self Meg­yn this is unpro­fes­sion­al and soon if you dont watch what your doing you will be (alleged­ly) as bad as Jen­nine pir­ro, jump­ing into a news sto­ry with no facts at all.