Categories
Politics

illegal immigration

Recently the Owner of the Phoenix Suns came out against the state of Arizona.

What if people started coming to the mall and just took what ever they wanted, is that not a crime, no one would or could be expected to put up with that they would call the police, they would do something right?

Consider this Argument

Arizona governor vs. Phoenix Suns owner –

I’d say she makes a pretty good case with her analogy!!

The owner of the Phoenix Suns basketball team, Robert Sarver, came out strongly opposing
AZ’s new immigration laws. Arizona ‘s Governor, Jan Brewer, released the following statement
in response to Sarver’s criticism of the new law:

“What if the owners of the Suns discovered that hordes of people were sneaking into games without paying?
What if they had a good idea who the gate-crashers are, but the ushers and security personnel were not allowed
to ask these folks to produce their ticket stubs, thus non-paying attendees couldn’t be ejected. Furthermore,
what if Suns’ ownership was expected to provide those who sneaked in with complimentary eats and drink?
And what if, on those days when a gate-crasher became ill or injured, the Suns had to provide free medical
care and shelter?” Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer

We have Washington more concerned with trying to allegedly destroy the constitution than finding a way to provide for the needs of the people, they are more concerned with allegedly subverting the constitution, (which by the way they swore an oath to protect and defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic, (which means illegal aliens,) so what is going on with Washington, is this really the hope and the change that you voted for in 2008?

The Tenth Amendment states the Constitution’s principle of federalism by providing that powers not granted to the federal government nor prohibited to the states by the Constitution are reserved, respectively, to the states or the people.

It is time that we stopped this mess by recalling those that refuse to do the duty for which they swore an oath, if they are not prepared to uphold the constitution, they need to go home, resign, and get out of town.

Categories
Politics

Fast and Furious backfired?

What should we learn from mistakes we make?

 

Should Eric Holder be held responsible for the deaths of citizens and border patrol agents that may have been killed because of this issue.

More calls for Eric Holder to resign amid allegations that he may have willfully lied to congress. Considering the mountain of evidence of the issues of competence, the unpopular stances where the justice department is pitted against the states rights in the constitution.

should the Justice department be suing states in court to allegedly take away their right to protect its people?

Does the Constitution not have a Tenth Amendment.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

 That seems straight forward and simple to understand.

Yet we have a man in charge of the Justice Department, that does not understand something as simple as the Tenth Amendment, what is wrong with that picture. 

Yes, some argue that immigration is a federal task, but is it solely such a task, when you have borders of each state, then does not a state have to protest its people?

Are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people….

When you look at this you have to say that a man has a right to protect his property his children, his land, his car, from being spoiled by an enemy, the same is true of the state, each official must protect its people.

So now we have Fast and Furious, which was allegedly designed to provide provender to the enemy, but perhaps caused a lot of other problems.

Did Fast and Furious do the very thing that the liberal media news was promoting in a story about how Mexico was complaining about how Guns were coming from the US, and ending up being used in violent crimes in Mexico, (remember that)

The liberal media was gearing up for a crucifixion of the Second Amendment to the constitution.

So where are they now, on this news story?

Why are they not crying about how American Gun shops are selling guns to be used in crimes south of the border?

Could it be that they no longer are interested in a true story that explains why there were so many complaints from Mexico.

Could it be that when the news story starts to hit home, (chickens or otherwise) that the liberal media is no longer interested in doing a news story about this fast and furious scandal.

In so many ways, this is a terrible thing to have done, and while some say that it has been done in the past, but in the past the level of violence was not the same south of the border so the idea that you send arms into a country that is already having so many problems with violence is just well crazy and insane.

 So the goal of this fast and furious, was what really, to track where guns went and how many people they killed?

Seems sort of a strange situation to be in when you want to try and take away other peoples rights to
keep and bear arms.

It seems that the constitution is not the problem here but men who would stand up and lie to the American people.

It seems like the old saying still holds true, that people make the decision to do harm to others, not the things with which they choose to do that harm, so you see attempting to ban guns or take away the second amendment, would not change much of anything, because since the beginning of time men have known how to be violent, if you take away every gun in the world, they would pick up sticks and stones as in the past and they would wage wars upon one another with a vigorous attention to detail.

No, this kind of thing is just a sad reminder that we are human and we make mistakes.

The constitution is still the best guide we have for standing up for America…

 

Categories
Politics

States rights is not just another theory…

My friends when men would rail and deprive others of freedom they are not good people it is not the hope and it is not the kind of change that people were told they could expect, it is because of this that we must vote those out of office that will not listen or do the will of the people.

Restoring the 10th Amendment
By Dustin Stockton

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Powerful, simple words. The Tenth Amendment was designed to be a catchall, ensuring that as our great nation developed, the choices of the federal government would remain secondary to the rights of the states. Yet federal politicians have found ways to circumvent their limited power. The result has been a disastrous eroding of personal liberty and government efficiency.

They’ve bastardized the intent of the interstate commerce clause. On Obamacare, Obama’s lawyers argue that the commerce clause gives them authority to regulate everything that has to do or not to do with the modern definition of commerce. Their argument goes like this. If people don’t purchase health insurance it impacts interstate commerce; therefore, the federal government has constitutional authority to mandate that every person purchase health insurance.

Imagine the implications if that argument is successful. The federal government would grant itself unilateral authority to dictate every purchase your family chooses or doesn’t choose to make. Don’t want to buy a new car in Nevada? That would impact the car industry in Michigan therefore granting authority for the government to demand that you buy a new car. Even worse, every decision has an impact on health. If given the power to regulate healthcare then the federal government could regulate every decision from what kind of toothpaste you use to what kind of food you eat. All these regulations would be controlled by a handful of politicians in Washington DC.

I support States’ rights because an ordinary citizen has almost no control over Washington. Each of us is represented by just one Congressman and two Senators. That means our individual vote only has an impact on 3/535 or about ½ of 1%. America is greatest when decisions are weighted as close to each individual as possible, because the smaller the government the more agile and reactive it can be to its unique community. Every individual school board should have broader control over its district’s education policy than the State and especially the federal government, because you can have an impact on your local school board that you can’t have with the federal government.

The 10th amendment applies both ways.

I don’t care if the people of Vermont use their education system to feminize their boys and sexualize their girls. I don’t care if they want to raise their effective tax rate to 90%. I could care less if they want to teach their children that avoiding pain is more important than perseverance and hard work. Their communities should be free to create a narcissistic liberal utopia and then suffer the consequences when it inevitably fails. On the same account, if I choose to live in a community where schools segregate based on ability, allow prayer, and teaches morality, the liberals in Vermont and the politicians in Washington should mind their own d–n business.

This is a big country. Communities in rural Alabama face far different challenges than communities in urban New York. The federal government will never have the ability to regulate each of those different communities equally and therefore should stay out of the business of regulating them at all. If it takes a Constitutional amendment to restrict the commerce clause in order to restore the Tenth Amendment that will be the cost of preserving liberty.

Dustin Stockton
Media/Events Director TheTeaParty.net
Chief Strategist Western Representation PAC

Federal judge blocks states rights?

Virginia rules, now we have rights again, this is headed for the supreme court.

As the sheriff says, Are we fighting our own government, as the sheriff of maricopa county Arizona believes?

Arizona, fights dictator?  Will this be the headline in just two months time?

Is america going down…

Liberals are trying to ruin this country, it is time to vote them out of office, it is time for them to step down, if they do not like to live here they need to leave.

Should we throw out the Tenth Amendment, if were smart enough to figure out this, then why cant a federal judge read one thing and understand how easy this really is.

One Judge, throws constitution out the window and now we are all racist if you don’t like it your a racist, what a mess, we have and if you

go back in time to just a few weeks ago you would see who actually started this whole mess, yes, you heard it right.

But really, if this situation had not been hyped by the media, no one would even care about what Arizona did.

It would not even be news.

But now we have the potential for a riot, and the bad thing is this the people are being bussed in from a state that does not even have anyone living there.

That is just plain stupid.

How is this possible I mean what do these people think that they are more than the whole.

It is of the people by the people and for the people, not one judge making a decision for everyone.

Just wait, after tonight, when the first illegal alien murders an American Citizen, that blood will forever be on her hands.

It is something that no one should ever want to have, but this judge made that decision it will be struck down by the supreme court.

Because, of the Tenth amendment to the constitution, this law is legal and there is nothing that anyone can do to stop it, it is infuriating that

we have judges that act politically and making a political decision, because this is Constitutional ethics 101.

Do states have the right to enforce Federal law, Yes they do and then some, because it is not a government of the person, but of the people, the framers of the

constitution knew this and that is why they created the tenth amendment, this judge took the easy way out and made the easy decision.

<object width=”500″ height=”385″><param name=”movie” value=”http://www.youtube.com/v/7pPWy5ioohM&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1″></param><param name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true”></param><param name=”allowscriptaccess” value=”always”></param><embed src=”http://www.youtube.com/v/7pPWy5ioohM&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1″ type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” allowscriptaccess=”always” allowfullscreen=”true” width=”500″ height=”385″></embed></object>

So, have we come to the point in our nation where we no longer make decisions by the law of the land but now we make decisions based on political will, that is not the way this nation was setup to work it is against everything that our fore fathers sacrificed to create for us and our children, it is against the will of the American people.

Categories
arrogant america

Arizona has a legal law

Looks like the liberals have finally read the bill and they see that it is legal, amazing right who would have thought that a state like Arizona could actually make its own laws?

When will the liberals get it? States have rights under the constitution, its called the Tenth Amendment, it is legal, it is constitutional, and it is supported by the people of arizona…

So what part of states rights and the tenth amendment, do the liberals not get? We have a ten page or so law that is constitutionally sound and if the liberals, who apparently want to destroy america, from the inside out, without firing a shot…

HAVE NOT EVEN READ…

If they had bothered to read the law they would see that it is not a problem at all but we have liberals that are going on TV and inciting riots…

What is wrong with people that do that, I mean who does that kind of thing and still calls himself a leader of a nation?

No one does, because, inciting riots is wrong even if you are a government official…

Wrong is Wrong…