Fast and Furious backfired?

What should we learn from mistakes we make?

 

Should Eric Hold­er be held respon­si­ble for the deaths of cit­i­zens and bor­der patrol agents that may have been killed because of this issue.

More calls for Eric Hold­er to resign amid alle­ga­tions that he may have will­ful­ly lied to con­gress. Con­sid­er­ing the moun­tain of evi­dence of the issues of com­pe­tence, the unpop­u­lar stances where the jus­tice depart­ment is pit­ted against the states rights in the con­sti­tu­tion.

should the Jus­tice depart­ment be suing states in court to alleged­ly take away their right to pro­tect its peo­ple?

Does the Con­sti­tu­tion not have a Tenth Amend­ment.

The pow­ers not del­e­gat­ed to the Unit­ed States by the Con­sti­tu­tion, nor pro­hib­it­ed by it to the States, are reserved to the States respec­tive­ly, or to the peo­ple.

 That seems straight for­ward and sim­ple to under­stand.

Yet we have a man in charge of the Jus­tice Depart­ment, that does not under­stand some­thing as sim­ple as the Tenth Amend­ment, what is wrong with that pic­ture. 

Yes, some argue that immi­gra­tion is a fed­er­al task, but is it sole­ly such a task, when you have bor­ders of each state, then does not a state have to protest its peo­ple?

Are reserved to the States respec­tive­ly, or to the peo­ple.…

When you look at this you have to say that a man has a right to pro­tect his prop­er­ty his chil­dren, his land, his car, from being spoiled by an ene­my, the same is true of the state, each offi­cial must pro­tect its peo­ple.

So now we have Fast and Furi­ous, which was alleged­ly designed to pro­vide proven­der to the ene­my, but per­haps caused a lot of oth­er prob­lems.

Did Fast and Furi­ous do the very thing that the lib­er­al media news was pro­mot­ing in a sto­ry about how Mex­i­co was com­plain­ing about how Guns were com­ing from the US, and end­ing up being used in vio­lent crimes in Mex­i­co, (remem­ber that)

The lib­er­al media was gear­ing up for a cru­ci­fix­ion of the Sec­ond Amend­ment to the con­sti­tu­tion.

So where are they now, on this news sto­ry?

Why are they not cry­ing about how Amer­i­can Gun shops are sell­ing guns to be used in crimes south of the bor­der?

Could it be that they no longer are inter­est­ed in a true sto­ry that explains why there were so many com­plaints from Mex­i­co.

Could it be that when the news sto­ry starts to hit home, (chick­ens or oth­er­wise) that the lib­er­al media is no longer inter­est­ed in doing a news sto­ry about this fast and furi­ous scan­dal.

In so many ways, this is a ter­ri­ble thing to have done, and while some say that it has been done in the past, but in the past the lev­el of vio­lence was not the same south of the bor­der so the idea that you send arms into a coun­try that is already hav­ing so many prob­lems with vio­lence is just well crazy and insane.

 So the goal of this fast and furi­ous, was what real­ly, to track where guns went and how many peo­ple they killed?

Seems sort of a strange sit­u­a­tion to be in when you want to try and take away oth­er peo­ples rights to
keep and bear arms.

It seems that the con­sti­tu­tion is not the prob­lem here but men who would stand up and lie to the Amer­i­can peo­ple.

It seems like the old say­ing still holds true, that peo­ple make the deci­sion to do harm to oth­ers, not the things with which they choose to do that harm, so you see attempt­ing to ban guns or take away the sec­ond amend­ment, would not change much of any­thing, because since the begin­ning of time men have known how to be vio­lent, if you take away every gun in the world, they would pick up sticks and stones as in the past and they would wage wars upon one anoth­er with a vig­or­ous atten­tion to detail.

No, this kind of thing is just a sad reminder that we are human and we make mis­takes.

The con­sti­tu­tion is still the best guide we have for stand­ing up for Amer­i­ca…