Categories
Politics

on the law and what it means to be free…

 [kc_heading_pac_1_headline_sub size=”50″ color=”#000″ ]Vote in 2014..[/kc_heading_pac_1_headline_sub]

 In many ways we might at times feel that a great person might be able to protect our family such as our fathers or perhaps a hero that would lay down his life to preserve his family.

These ideas are a part of who we are and that is not going to change.

However there is a disturbing idea out there that a dictator might try to dissolve the constitution little by little deciding that we do not know what is best but that he knows what is best.

This idea has always resulted in something evil.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

It always has and always will that also will never change.

You decide for yourself, do you want a dictator?

If you do then vote democratic in 2014…

If you value the constitution and you value your way of life then you know how to vote this coming year.

Gov. Rick Perry sat back in shock when I told him President Obama told Mexicans that an upside of his efforts to infringe the Second Amendment would be to make them safer. The Texas Republican, a lifetime member of the National Rifle Association (NRA), pushed back his chair and thought before speaking.

“The idea that a United States president would go to Mexico and make that statement is incredulous,” the 2012 president candidate told me in an interview after his rousing speech at the NRA annual meeting in Houston Friday. “His goal — well before he became president of the United States — was to try to disarm the American public. He just disregards the Constitution…”

 

Categories
Politics

Fast and Furious backfired?

What should we learn from mistakes we make?

 

Should Eric Holder be held responsible for the deaths of citizens and border patrol agents that may have been killed because of this issue.

More calls for Eric Holder to resign amid allegations that he may have willfully lied to congress. Considering the mountain of evidence of the issues of competence, the unpopular stances where the justice department is pitted against the states rights in the constitution.

should the Justice department be suing states in court to allegedly take away their right to protect its people?

Does the Constitution not have a Tenth Amendment.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

 That seems straight forward and simple to understand.

Yet we have a man in charge of the Justice Department, that does not understand something as simple as the Tenth Amendment, what is wrong with that picture. 

Yes, some argue that immigration is a federal task, but is it solely such a task, when you have borders of each state, then does not a state have to protest its people?

Are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people….

When you look at this you have to say that a man has a right to protect his property his children, his land, his car, from being spoiled by an enemy, the same is true of the state, each official must protect its people.

So now we have Fast and Furious, which was allegedly designed to provide provender to the enemy, but perhaps caused a lot of other problems.

Did Fast and Furious do the very thing that the liberal media news was promoting in a story about how Mexico was complaining about how Guns were coming from the US, and ending up being used in violent crimes in Mexico, (remember that)

The liberal media was gearing up for a crucifixion of the Second Amendment to the constitution.

So where are they now, on this news story?

Why are they not crying about how American Gun shops are selling guns to be used in crimes south of the border?

Could it be that they no longer are interested in a true story that explains why there were so many complaints from Mexico.

Could it be that when the news story starts to hit home, (chickens or otherwise) that the liberal media is no longer interested in doing a news story about this fast and furious scandal.

In so many ways, this is a terrible thing to have done, and while some say that it has been done in the past, but in the past the level of violence was not the same south of the border so the idea that you send arms into a country that is already having so many problems with violence is just well crazy and insane.

 So the goal of this fast and furious, was what really, to track where guns went and how many people they killed?

Seems sort of a strange situation to be in when you want to try and take away other peoples rights to
keep and bear arms.

It seems that the constitution is not the problem here but men who would stand up and lie to the American people.

It seems like the old saying still holds true, that people make the decision to do harm to others, not the things with which they choose to do that harm, so you see attempting to ban guns or take away the second amendment, would not change much of anything, because since the beginning of time men have known how to be violent, if you take away every gun in the world, they would pick up sticks and stones as in the past and they would wage wars upon one another with a vigorous attention to detail.

No, this kind of thing is just a sad reminder that we are human and we make mistakes.

The constitution is still the best guide we have for standing up for America…

 

Categories
Politics

Genghis Khan We demand you return the land…

Should we go back and demand that every nation on the face of the earth return all the land they have ever fought over? What about the many millions of lives that have been lost because of land, War War, ll and really many wars have been fought over land, so what now we just demand that the victors return land…

Is this the hope and the Change you voted for in Washington?

Think about that for a moment, did not England have the United States first, should the US not be returned to control of England? I know its hard to understand how some people find this topic so interesting, because it is foolishness to consider that anyone can demand a nation do anything much less a leader that has no real experience in dealing with foreign nations.

Is this what you thought you would be getting when you voted for hope and change?

So This does not make any sense, if you go back and say hey, this land used to belong to someone else but through war, or through what ever means, (check your history on this) the land no longer belongs to the looser of the battle, but if you can go back in time and demand that someone give back land they won through battle then do we not need to give all the land back to the Native Indians?

What about the Land in the south, was not Florida a Spanish colony at one time.

Texas, should we go back and give Texas back to Mexico?

Wait, what about Germany, should not we now go back to 1939 and demand that Germany be afforded its land back.

What about even further back in time, did not England take Ireland and now should not England return to its former enemies the land and the usury of that land to Ireland and its families?

So, looking at this issue what about Genghis Khan should not all the land and all the peoples and all the slaves that they took be returned to their rightful owners?

So when you look at a statement like this.

President Obama, in speech on Middle East policy, tells Israel to pull back to its 1967 borders and allow for creation of self-governing Palestinian state

When you think about it no one else would demand anything of another nation, it would be a silly thing to do, when you make demands of other nations, you cause your self and your family (thats us by the way) to look dumb and most Americans understand that this kind of “give the land” back thing is just plan dumb.

Do you wonder why Gas is so high, do you wonder why the cost of food is so high, what about the state of the economy? When you look at the sheer ignorance of such a statement, (allegedly)
(I am sure it was someone else’s fault or perhaps some bad advice)

Not sure, but I am sure of one thing, no one in the history of all mankind has ever demanded that any nation return land won in battle, no matter how long ago it has been.

I find it insulting that we have people in Washington that are so un-educated in historical facts, what is wrong with people that do not know history?

So, what do you think is it bad advice or is it a lack of education?

I have to really question this kind of hope and change because we need real hope and real change not ignorance.

Categories
california

Ninth Circuit

Well this just in folks, imagine an attorney arguing that how a forign nation feels about the constitution makes the constitution invalid?

This apparently is one of the reasons why when California talks about how they need money because they are so messed up most people just are not very interested in hearing about it.

The topic Arizona immigration law.

Does a state have the right to perform its duties to the people by protecting them from illegal aliens?

When you are stopped by a law enforcement officer, what if you said you know what you dont have no right to ask to see my drivers license or to ask me any question because Mexico does not like your laws and so that makes it unconstitutional?

Now I ask you where in the existing law does that have any place?

Warning the following video is offensive it is posted here because it is evoking, we do not agree with everything in this video but the problem is this, Washington is not listening, we have been betrayed by the hope and change that everyone thought they would get, this next election do not be swayed by lies and hate, but be educated and learn about what is happening in our own nation.