Categories
Internet fraud Politics

Dangers strangers and the internet

You know there are a lot of dangerous things going on these days and its not happening on the local street corner like it used to be and still is in some places.

There are some places where people are getting taken for their money and there is no sheriff.

There is no one that will help these people that end up loosing often lots of money.  

Categories
2016 election 2016 vote them out Politics

New York grand jury

Protesters have been protesting the facts but they do not have the truth.

What they have is what the media have published.

That is not the truth.

You see there is a serious problem with the justice system in this nation and it is the propensity to over charge alleged crime.

We have seen this many times over the last few years.

Hundreds of times actually, what they are doing is to charge a crime at the maximum, if someone is remotely involved in a crime where someone dies, they are charged with first degree murder and they ask for the maximum, a death sentence.

The problem with this strategy is that it no longer works.

Categories
Politics

The lives of the innocent…

Right now in a small town on the border of a NATO nation is a tragedy just waiting to occur.

The media have covered it though not as much as you might expect.

The horror of what is about to happen in this town is that once it does happen the media will cover it for days.

They will show the bodies, they will cover the atrocities.

Why not cover it now?

Why do we have to wait to see what we know will happen if nothing is done to stop this from happening.

Categories
Politics

Trayvon Martin Guilty or Innocent?

 

 [kc_heading_pac_3_headline_main size=”30″ color=”#C00″ ]Media Justice..[/kc_heading_pac_3_headline_main]
 

The media are playing games with the minds of millions of people all over the world. While it may seem an innocuous thing, They are depicting images that came out when the case first broke.

That they are showing images of a much younger Trayvon Martin, perhaps as much as 5 years before the tragic incident took place.

Yet they show Zimmerman as he is now, so is that fair?

Well in a word no it is not fair. There are images of an older Trayvon Martin one that shows his interest in street fighting, shows his interest in Gang politics, (allegedly) Images that show a much different looking Trayvon Martin, images that depict a perhaps and allegedly violent Martin a side of the man that no one has seen but yet the media show only those images that tend to depict the man as if he were an innocent.

The problem is that Trayvon Martin was a man, were the situation reversed Trayvon Martin would have been charged as an adult, everyone knows that, yet they are still showing images that show him as he WAS, when he was much younger.

So why are the media not showing the images of Martin closer to his actual age?

Why are they playing games here because this is serious business.

 We know the media have sought to bend fold mutilate this case from the beginning, yet the media can get away with doing just about anything they want to do.

 

source,

The state says Zimmerman chased and confronted Martin, and then fired at Martin only after he realized he was losing the ensuing fight. Zimmerman says he fired in self-defense after Martin doubled back and attacked him, breaking his nose and bashing his head on the sidewalk.

The killing became a national story after Sanford police refused to charge Zimmerman with any crime, saying they had no evidence to counter his self-defense claim. Forty-four days later a Seminole County grand jury indicted Zimmerman on second degree murder charges.

If convicted, Zimmerman, an aspiring police officer who served as a neighborhood watch captain, could spend the rest of his life in Florida state prison.

 

Categories
Politics

Judd Gate? Or innocent recording?

 Danger is the press covering the news or are they lying to you every day…
 

The truth can be difficult to understand at least when you are looking at the TV that the Media want to tell you all about these days, what years ago was a crime is now what? Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s reelection campaign asked the FBI and the U.S. attorney’s office on Tuesday to investigate how Mother Jones magazine obtained a recording of a February strategy session.

“Senator McConnell’s campaign is working with the FBI and has notified the local U.S. Attorney in Louisville, per FBI request, about these recordings,” McConnell campaign manager Jesse Benton said in a statement. “Obviously a recording device of some kind was placed in Senator McConnell’s campaign office without consent. By whom and how that was accomplished presumably will be the subject of a criminal investigation.”

 

Categories
Politics

Gun Control Manure?

Well, imagine for a moment that what you see on TV is a carefully orchestrated, Chaos, that is designed to make you think one way or the other, here is a story that is very interesting not because it is a horrible news story, (sorry with today’s media its all about the bad news) check this out.

The following article appeared in the January 1, 1992 Los Angeles Times.
This is the story you saw on the evening news:

At lunch hour on Wednesday, Oct. 16, George Jo Hennard of Belton, Tex. smashed his Ford pickup through the plate glass doors of Luby’s cafeteria in Killeen, injuring some patrons immediately. While other patrons rushed toward the truck believing the driver was a heart-attack victim, Hennard calmly climbed out of his pickup, took out two 9-millimeter semi-automatic pistols, and started shooting people in the cafeteria’s serving line.

Hennard continued shooting for 10 minutes, reloading five times. One of his pistols jammed repeatedly, causing him to discard it. There would have been plenty of opportunity for any of the cafeteria’s customers or employees to return fire. None did because none of them were armed. Texas law forbids private citizens from carrying firearms out of their home or business. Luby’s employee’s manual forbids employees from carrying firearms.

Police officers were inside Luby’s within minutes. But before they were able to corner Hennard in the cafeteria’s restroom, where he turned his gun fatally on himself, Hennard had killed 15 women and 8 men, wounded 19 and caused at least five more to be injured attempting to flee.

The Killeen massacre was ready-made excitement for the media: a madman with a gun, lots of gruesome pictures. CBS News devoted an entire “48 Hours” Dan Rather report to it. Sarah Brady of Handgun Control Inc. capitalized on it in a nationally published column to call Congress cowardly for voting down more stringent gun laws the next day.

Now here’s a story you probably didn’t see:

Late at night on Tuesday, December 17, two men armed with recently-stolen pistols herded 20 customers and employees of a Shoney’s restaurant in Anniston, Ala., into the walk-in refrigerator, and locked it. Continuing to hold the manager at gunpoint, the men began robbing the restaurant.

Then one of the robbers found a customer who had hidden under a table and pulled a gun on him. The customer, Thomas Glenn Terry, legally armed with a .45 semi-automatic pistol, fired five shots into that robber’s chest and abdomen, killing him instantly.
The other robber, who was holding the manager at gunpoint, opened fire on Terry and grazed him. Terry returned fire, hitting the second robber several times and wounding him critically.

The robbery attempt was over. The Shoney’s customers and employees were freed. No one else was hurt.
Because Terry was armed, and used his gun to stop two armed robbers who had taken a restaurant full of people hostage, there was no drawn-out crisis, no massacre, no victims’ families for Dan Rather to interview. Consequently, the story hasn’t received much coverage.

Among those who rely on national news media for their view of the country, the bloody image of Luby’s Cafeteria is available to lend the unchallenged impression that guns in private hands serve only to kill innocent people. The picture of 20 hostages walking out of Shoney’s refrigerator unharmed, because a private citizen was armed that night, is not.

As we celebrate the bicentennial of the Bill of Rights, it’s worth noting that the Framers wrote the Second Amendment so the people’s defense would be in our own hands, and we wouldn’t have to rely on a “standing army” or “select militia” for our security. Though no police departments existed in America then, there’s no historical doubt that the Framers had considered centralized public defense, and considered it not merely ineffective, but itself dangerous to public safety. Recent vigilante-type police attacks, such as the beating of Rodney King, lend credence.

Yet, it’s fashionable to relegate constitutional protections to the dustbin of history. Judges sworn to defend the Constitution ignore its clear provisions, as do legislators. Virtually every major organ of society – both political parties, the media, the American Bar Assn., the ACLU – urges them to do so.

Today’s “consensus reality” asserts that private firearms play no effective role in the civic defense, and that firearms must be restricted to reduce crime. The media repeat these assertions as a catechism, and treat those who challenge them as heretics.
Yet, we have before us an experiment showing us alternative outcomes. In one case, we have a restaurant full of unarmed people who rely on the police to save them. The result is 23 innocent lives lost, and an equivalent number wounded. In the second case, we have one armed citizen on the scene and not one innocent life lost.
How can the choice our society needs to make be any clearer?

It’s time to rid ourselves of the misbegotten idea that public safety can be achieved by unilateral disarmament of the honest citizen, and realize that the price of public safety is, like liberty, eternal vigilance. We can tire ourselves in futile debates on how to keep guns out of the wrong hands. Or we can decide that innocent lives deserve better than to be cut short, if only we, as a society, will take upon ourselves the civic responsibility of defending our fellow citizens, as Thomas Glenn Terry did in Alabama.

My account of Thomas Glenn Terry’s actions in this article was based on an Alabama newspaper account. I later interviewed Terry for a weekly radio program I was hosting and discovered that the account was mistaken on several points.

Postal clerk Terry was finishing a late-night dinner with his wife when the robbers came in and took over the restaurant. Terry hid his .45 Colt Government Model under his sweater, not seeing any immediate opportunity to use it. Terry’s wife was captured with the other customers and herded off to the cooler, where one of the robbers proceeded to collect wallets and jewelry.

Terry did not hide under a table; he had separated himself from the other customers and managed to get to a back door in the Shoney’s to see if it was open so he could escape and call the police. The door was chained shut. At that point one of the robbers discovered him and when the robber drew on him, Terry pulled his own handgun from under his sweater and returned fire, incapacitating this robber, who ultimately survived. The second robber heard the exchange of gunfire and also drew on Terry; it was the gun fight between Terry and this second robber which resulted in the robber running out to the parking lot, where he died from his wounds. It was at this point that Terry told the store manager to phone the police, informing them that an armed customer was present; Terry then proceeded to the cooler and released his wife and the other customers.

Both robbers whom Terry shot had previous armed robberies on their record, and one had murdered a motel clerk just a few days earlier. A third robber escaped as soon as Terry exchanged gunfire with the first robber.

The only national media outlet to cover this incident as news, just two months after the Killeen restaurant massacre, was the Christian Science Monitor. -JNS

Categories
Politics

The world is on fire and you dont know it?

Have you ever thought about what it would be like if you ended up being the last one to know something had happened in the world that would change your life?

What if there was a flood and no one bothered to report it?

The idea that the media cannot be trusted to report the news is something that up until the last 20 years was something that only crackpots thought about, but how things have changed.

For instance, there are reports coming out now that it is very possible that the United States Armed Forces, could have saved the lives of our fallen men that died in Libya.

Have you see this one the news? 

Probably not, if your reading this for the first time, then there are a lot of things you probably never heard before.

These days it seems that the media not only do not report the actual news they make the news up…

You may not know that many people are turning to the internet to see different views on world events, simply because some chowder-head producer and liberal station owners, censor the news so that you never see what they do not want you to see, (sounds like a good movie right,) the only problem is that its true.

If Europe were on fire or the middle east were having serious problems, you might never learn about it if you watch many of the biased news companies, (hint most of them have three letters)  there are so many issues with news companies that do not report the news…

Take a recently published news story where the reporters made up evidence against a suspect.

   Does that sound bad to you? 

It should because it happen in Florida this year.

Did you hear about it on the news?

No, you probably did not, because, when reporters break the rules they mostly don’t report the facts behind criminal activities by reporters, why is that you might be asking , well that is a very good question because the story above is not fictional it is factual, no charges were filed against the reporters, in fact they did not even loose their jobs. 

The truth is what reporting should be about, not making up evidence against what might be an innocent man.

The issues we face these days are complicated, but the people you trust to bring you the news are as important as the news is because if the news media cannot be trusted to report the news when you need information you may not ever hear about the most important news stories in the world.

Question, the news media because what you don’t know can hurt you more than you realize.

 

 

 

 

Categories
Politics

The last words of an innocent man?

Will this be the last words of an innocent man?

Will the state of Georgia put this man to death?

Is this the state that you want to move to?

Categories
social sotomayor stupid judges stupid senate stupid washington stupidity Supreme Court total economic collaspe traitors in office traitors in the FED TSA attorney TSA jackass TSA jerks

troy davis innocent?

Is he innocent, and if he is should the white people in Georgia be putting this man to death?

Categories
arrogant america Barbara Wa Wa bias news coverage biased AP biased fox news biased judge blago bloomberg atheist?

Riots in Georgia?

What will happen tonight when they put what might well be an innocent man to death?