Categories
Politics

zimmerman juror breaks rules?

You might wonder about the Juror that came out and made statements about the Zimmerman case.

On ABC yesterday there was an instance of “bobble head bias”

They had an interview with the Juror, who apparently had second thoughts about her decision.

The truth about this left leaning broadcast, was that there were several facts left out of the heavily biased presentation.

Fact number one.

If the State of Florida had not been allegedly, showboating, they would have charged the case correctly.

involuntary manslaughter.

This juror would have had no problem with that charge nor would any of the others.

So, first and foremost, the state of Florida was at fault here.

Second Fact.

The Bobble head, added to the statement made by the juror, (Stating that the juror was ashamed that she had done this) (paraphrased)

So, why the spin?

Again over and over again we have seen these suspect news companies act ignorantly about the facts of this case.

It appears that the media have an agenda to make race relations worse to the point of the destruction of lives.

Now I have to ask is this the way that advertisers on those shows want to be associated?

If you have a question about why advertisers continue to advertise on media broadcasts where the objective seems to be destructive to the human condition why not ask the advertiser?

The truth about advertisers is that they hope you do not notice that they are funding destructive and nasty biased news, (allegedly)

They are actively participating in this kind of tabloid garbage.

Categories
Politics

MSNBC again involved in deception?

What is deception?

something that deceives or is intended

to deceive; fraud; artifice.

Working for MSNBC has gone to Joe Scarborough’s head, or at least his ears. The Joe of “Morning Joe, broadcast on the “Lean Forward” network, was caught in the latest TV video scandal because he won’t listen.

During his Wednesday broadcast, Scarborough again mocked GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney, this time for how he handled an Ohio appearance with vice presidential running mate Paul Ryan. The show played a clip of Romney taking the mike and saying Ryan is “quite a guy.” The crowd was then shown chanting as the words “Ryan!” popped up on the screen to indicate that’s what they were saying. Romney then instructed the crowd to chant “Romney/Ryan.”

The camera flashed back to the “Morning Joe” set where Scarborough put head in hands and said “Oh, sweet Jesus.” That reaction made the front page of Huffington Post and, as things do when spurred on by HuffPo, it went viral.

[kc_heading_pac_10_headline_5 size=”122″ color=”#dd0d0d” ]Lies? or Accidents?..[/kc_heading_pac_10_headline_5]

“fool me once …”  You know the saying about deception

Back during the Trayvon Martin shooting incident it was alleged and likely proven that reporters had edited the audio of a 911 call to make it appear as if race was an integral part of the topic of conversation of the phone call the truth was much different and in fact had anyone else done this it would not only have been the same as crying wolf but just about anyone else in America would now be in Jail for fraud, attempting to incite a riot, actually inciting a riot, criminal behavior beyond the pail.

But they were excused though quietly many people made a note of this behavior so that is why now when we see the same behavior again its time to put an end to this kind of stupidity.

Someone needs to be fired…

Now we have yet another example of deception intentional likely in fact allegedly very likely.

I am ashamed of the press and the media they are becoming an ugly devil that is not worthy of the office of reporting the news, the profession of journalism used to be a respected career but sadly that is changing with all of these seriously ignorant producers on all the networks that appear to be intentionally intent on destroying the press in favor of what?

Censorship?

What sellouts, what liars, what robbers of the truth are these people?

WE the people are getting tired of this kind of yellow journalism.

That is what this is, Yellow, Journalism, a stinking yellow mark down the backs of thousands of publications all over the US.

If you are unable to report on facts you are in the wrong business, if you are unable to keep your own personal opinion from coloring the facts, you need to find a job flipping hamburgers, go do that because you have no business in this business.

Reporting is a sick friend but we the people will not stand for this kind of reporting neither will the advertisers…

 

 

 

Categories
Politics

biased CNN debate tonight

Well time for CNN to have yet allegedly another biased news media event
where  they may be likely to ask questions that are unfair and biased in
nature.

You just have to wonder in part why put up with a news company that
is not really a news company at all?

You have to wonder when you see these questions from these liberals.

They ask questions based on emotion, not fact, they ask questions that
they do not want to answer if the shoe were on the other foot they would
say that it was racist to ask questions like that.

They will say all kinds of things that make no sense at all.

They have an agenda, to try to make the debaters look bad and to attack each other.
They try to phrase a question where there is only one outcome to that question, the
answer they want to hear, and that may not be the truth at all.

It is a problem when the news is no longer the news.

In some ways there has been a call for some of these so called news companies that are
so far left or right for that matter that they should not be afforded the right to broadcast.

That is a little extreme, however if you have a news company that distorts the truth and
you have a news company that attempts to taint the news in its own image then that is
a real issue that perhaps we should discuss.

Cnn tonight will be doing the moderation, now to make it fair they should have at
least one moderator for each viewpoint, but that is not the way that they usually operate.
most of the time they are sneaky, (allegedly)

Most of the time they try to carefully word their questions where they can come up
with the now famous or infamous analogy of the “Gotcha” Question.

This does no one any good and it is also not news worthy.

In the old days this would have been considered unprofessional and it would have been
considered stupid. 

These days we have to put up with CNN or Do we?

Do we really have to put up with the biased and ugly (allegedly) coverage that CNN often
attempts to use words that are weighted to try and to create a certain impression when
one does not really exist.

They often say things that are not true, and then they try to hide that fact by using
confusing narratives, that can be misunderstood or even intentionally vague so that
they can then follow up with another “gotcha” question, while this might be entertainment for some of these liberals in the News media it is insulting to most clear thinking Americans.

So while some may think that watching a biased news company attempting to pursue
its own agenda at the expense of the public entertainment, we dont see it that way.

 

 

Categories
Politics

Media Bias the Third man in the ring?

Should the media be banned from influencing the outcomes of elections?

Should they be actively seeking to develop methods of influence and then charging large multi-national corporations, (which pay no taxes) to peddle that influence on a broadcast? 

Opinion for sale to the highest bidder?   Is that news, Really?

Is the media now a participant in the political process and if so is it fair for the media to take sides in this process which is and has ever been that of the people by the people for the people. If you were to go to a boxing match and the announcer suddenly started punching one opponent, the first thing that you would think would be “What the Heck is going on” this is a boxing contest between two opponents not two against one, but that is really what is going on when you look at what the media did in 2008 and has continued to do for the last three years.

Yet, apparently most of America has either not noticed or they are blind to what the media has been doing.

Are they really that slick that they can operate behind smoke filled rooms carefully planning on who will be the next president of the United States, and if that is going on, how is that a fair contest?

The press and the media used to report the news, now they are becoming the news story.

Will the people allow the media to attempt to influence and control the voting process through allegedly unfair coverage of the political process.

In the boxing analogy above, it would be insane to consider two against one a fair contest yet, that is really what the media is doing pretending to cover the news but really inventing the news according to their own ideas of what they “think the news should be.

When you consider the entire story then you have to acknowledge that the media has been actively participating in the political election process for some time now, but until the internet no one knew what they were up to or few people knew it because the media cannot actively report on their own behaviors can they?

Categories
Politics

FTC in the wrong?

Is the FTC biting off more than it can chew in trying to regulate the internet,

Broadcast, TV, Cable TV, Subscriber lines, Radio, what will be next, free speech?

will you one day wake up to find that you can no longer express an opinion?

When good men do not stand up to the oppressive idea of ignorant fools how will we ever be free?

The same consumer protection laws that apply to commercial activities in other media apply online. The FTC Acts prohibition on unfair or deceptive acts or practices encompasses Internet advertising, marketing and sales. In addition, many Commission rules and guides are not limited to any particular medium used to disseminate claims or advertising, and therefore, apply to online activi- ties.

Is the above statement accurate?

Seriously is the above statement really accurate, do the same consumer protection laws equally apply to commercial activities in other media online.

The day that broadcast commercials apply the same disclosure statements, that the FTC proposes for internet advertisements will be the day that they have got it right…

The problem is that there are two sets of rules, one for broadcast television commercials and a second one that they allegedly wish to oppress the internet with.

Will this end up being a method to create the “fairness doctrine for the internet”

Do yourself a favor, read and comment on the disclosure proposals for online advertising.

will we find the truth or will we end up loosing our freedom to speak out loud.

from dot com disclosures.

Disclosures that are required to prevent an ad from being misleading

The problem here is this, until the same protection is applied to broadcast television then this is not constitutional.

So, when will be see equal protection for broadcast Television?

To make a disclosure clear and conspicuous, advertisers should:

  • Place disclosures near, and when possible, on the same screen as the trigger-ing claim.
  • Use text or visual cues to encourage consumers to scroll down a Web page when it is necessary to view a disclosure.

When using hyperlinks to lead to disclosures,

?    make the link obvious;

?    label the hyperlink appropriately to convey the importance, nature and
relevance of the information it leads to;

?    use hyperlink styles consistently so that consumers know when a link is
available;