Categories
Politics

Fox news pandering to haters?

Is fox news a Hater?

You see several of the Bobble heads, that have commented over the last few days, have indicated an over all bias in the matter of the Casey Anthony Trial, many of these bobble heads have little or no experience in matters of the law, but have no trouble making allegedly hate filled statements.

Should these Bobble heads be charged with a crime should some harm come to Casey Anthony, I certainly hope that she has enough body guards, because at the rate that Fox news is allegedly spewing hatred we could see violence and more so when popular media figures begin to make accusations, and negative statements you have to wonder about the possibility that a person could be innocent.

Back several years ago the media made statements that ended up allegedly helping to convict a man who years later turned out to be innocent of the charges preferred against him, the media jumped all over it talking about how horrible this man was, they made all kinds of stupid statements.

They said things they could not prove, they made allegations, they could not prove, however, no one stood up for this poor man because the media was so sure that he was guilty.

It turned out years later that the man was actually innocent and that DNA evidence was developed that exonerated the man, who had spent 20 years in prison in part due to the media that was just so sure that the man was guilty they never even considered that the man might be innocent.

The legal system should be based on the premise that the accused is innocent until proven guilty however that just is not the case, once a man or a woman has been accused, most of the time they never fully recover, which means that no matter what comes out later to clear a persons name they will forever be known as guilty usually this is pronounced by the media.

The problem with this issue is that it circumvents the will of the people.

The media have no right to influence the public perception however that is what Fox news and to be fair most of the other networks as well, have all openly engaged, in negative speculation never once being fair and balanced, such as Fox news claims to be.

Even Bill orielly, the so called Spin ends here King of the after noon market, was allegedly unable to keep an open mind, and he claims that the spin stops here, however there was only one spin in this case and it was neither fair nor balanced.

The truth here is that the State of Florida charged the case incorrectly this was a mistake, they paid for that mistake.

They should have charged the case correctly, accidental death, they could have proven easily, Casey Anthony might now be enjoying the charming company of many inmates for 12 to 25 years, however the state sought the life of this defendant without cause.

Now that is one view, obviously the media is angry because the girl was not to be put to death, that is saying some really nasty stuff about human behavior, but do we not have the duty to have an open mind?

Because what Bill was doing the other evening was nothing but spin, so I have no respect for him or his values, because the spin obviously did not stop it started with him, shame on you bill, sometimes opinion can be more than what the people need to hear.

Categories
Politics

Fast and Furious backfired?

What should we learn from mistakes we make?

 

Should Eric Holder be held responsible for the deaths of citizens and border patrol agents that may have been killed because of this issue.

More calls for Eric Holder to resign amid allegations that he may have willfully lied to congress. Considering the mountain of evidence of the issues of competence, the unpopular stances where the justice department is pitted against the states rights in the constitution.

should the Justice department be suing states in court to allegedly take away their right to protect its people?

Does the Constitution not have a Tenth Amendment.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

 That seems straight forward and simple to understand.

Yet we have a man in charge of the Justice Department, that does not understand something as simple as the Tenth Amendment, what is wrong with that picture. 

Yes, some argue that immigration is a federal task, but is it solely such a task, when you have borders of each state, then does not a state have to protest its people?

Are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people….

When you look at this you have to say that a man has a right to protect his property his children, his land, his car, from being spoiled by an enemy, the same is true of the state, each official must protect its people.

So now we have Fast and Furious, which was allegedly designed to provide provender to the enemy, but perhaps caused a lot of other problems.

Did Fast and Furious do the very thing that the liberal media news was promoting in a story about how Mexico was complaining about how Guns were coming from the US, and ending up being used in violent crimes in Mexico, (remember that)

The liberal media was gearing up for a crucifixion of the Second Amendment to the constitution.

So where are they now, on this news story?

Why are they not crying about how American Gun shops are selling guns to be used in crimes south of the border?

Could it be that they no longer are interested in a true story that explains why there were so many complaints from Mexico.

Could it be that when the news story starts to hit home, (chickens or otherwise) that the liberal media is no longer interested in doing a news story about this fast and furious scandal.

In so many ways, this is a terrible thing to have done, and while some say that it has been done in the past, but in the past the level of violence was not the same south of the border so the idea that you send arms into a country that is already having so many problems with violence is just well crazy and insane.

 So the goal of this fast and furious, was what really, to track where guns went and how many people they killed?

Seems sort of a strange situation to be in when you want to try and take away other peoples rights to
keep and bear arms.

It seems that the constitution is not the problem here but men who would stand up and lie to the American people.

It seems like the old saying still holds true, that people make the decision to do harm to others, not the things with which they choose to do that harm, so you see attempting to ban guns or take away the second amendment, would not change much of anything, because since the beginning of time men have known how to be violent, if you take away every gun in the world, they would pick up sticks and stones as in the past and they would wage wars upon one another with a vigorous attention to detail.

No, this kind of thing is just a sad reminder that we are human and we make mistakes.

The constitution is still the best guide we have for standing up for America…

 

Categories
Aarp Politics

Is Casee innocent or guilty or just stupid?

Can Casee get a fair trial in Flordia

Is the legal System Broken?

When the people cannot prove a case should they not work for proper punishment?

Most people think that Casee Anthony is Guilty, some think that she should be beaten and put to death.

Still others suggest that she should be given mental health treatments, perhaps even going so far as to say that she should never be allowed to have a child again?

Wait, are you serious, do some people living in Florida think that this girl should be sterilized so this never happens again?

When the media portrays a situation which might have been an accident as if the girl is a monster, to get advertisers for their new stations, is that not a conflict of interest in news reporting?

What is the real issue here, a small beautiful child lost her life, due to her mothers alleged stupidity and or willful neglect, is that actual or is that just the state of Florida, doing every thing they can to make sure that someone “anyone” is held responsible, that someone pays, and is held to an impossible standard, you have to wonder, because you look at a forensic, scientist, (if you can really call them that at all) and if all they have is one or two hairs, that may have come from the child, but they may or may not have been alive, or dead, wait, are you confused yet?

You should be because what we are seeing here is a media circus, and perhaps we are seeing a miscarriage of justice, what if, for a moment, what if, the media were not involved in this case at all.

What if there were no TV cameras, allowed…

Stupid is as stupid does…

What if, the state of Florida had to actually prove its allegations, beyond a reasonable doubt…

Think about that for a moment, how often do we allow what should have been private conversations between parent and child to be broadcast on the evening news…

Makes you wonder about the state of the justice system in the Great state of Florida.

I can tell you one thing, this case was badly handled, (allegedly) from the start.

There continue to be an absence of relevant information presented at this trial, or so it would seem, because all we are seeing of it is this admittedly very thin evidence, (if you can even call it that) there is very little evidence tying this girl to a dead body having been in the truck of back of a vehicle.

One thing that I find incredible here is that we have a girl that is obviously not the brightest tool in the shed, here and the best that the State of Florida can present to attempt and tie this girl to the death of this child is very (allegedly) weak testimony from some science geek that cannot really as a matter of fact produce one piece of evidence that 100 percent ties this girl to a crime.

Is she stupid, you bet, not doubt about it…

Does she need mental help, again you bet, your beef cakes.

Was she smart enough to hide all the evidence so that it was never discovered, until all the evidence was gone, this I believe is an easy No, this girl was not that smart.

It would seem that if this girl was half as smart as the State of Florida would have you think that she is, we would not be listening to some geek sitting in a chair with very little “real” evidence that any crime was committed at all.

In a statement given allegedly by a third party, the use of the word advised, is used on several occasions, this apparently and allegedly was in some reports from the orange county sheriff, but do real people talk like that at all?

Or do LAW  ENFORCEMENT, individuals talk like this?

Do Law Enforcement officers, make statements, like subject advised me that, or this person advised me of this fact, this is just not accurate, real people in real life do not talk like this at all.

 

Categories
Politics

MSMBC What a Goof?

Imagine for a moment that some goof goes on national TV and attempts to bash a young attract female on the use of the American flag?

Amazing stuff folks, you just cannot make this stuff up, and more than that how close is this to using a broadcast license to allegedly lie and make allegations on TV for a political party?

 

Is that legal?

Can a broadcast network engage in political discourse to influence the outcome of a political race?

Amazing though when you consider the method of influence that large networks have over the American public you have to wonder why in this modern age  that we are living in that there is not a law that prevents networks from being biased and perhaps even lying in the course of some of the alleged Pretend news that they have these days.