Natural Immunity

Is there such a thing as being immune?

The human Immune sys­tem has three dif­fer­ent types of immune func­tions they work togeth­er to respond to a prob­lem or a threat to the body. Nat­u­ral­ly not every expo­sure requires a response as every human body is dif­fer­ent. Some peo­ple are com­plete­ly immune to the flu they do not get the flu it is a genet­ic prop­er­ty that con­sti­tutes about 70 per­cent of the pop­u­la­tion remain unaf­fect­ed by the flu because that body is not sus­cep­ti­ble to that virus. source.

The dif­fer­ent types of human immu­ni­ty are Innate pas­sive and adap­tive. (oth­er mech­a­nisms also work togeth­er to pro­duce anti­bod­ies when required)

Innate immu­ni­ty: Every­one is born with innate (or nat­ur­al) immu­ni­ty, a type of gen­er­al pro­tec­tion

Adap­tive immu­ni­ty: Adap­tive (or active) immu­ni­ty devel­ops through­out our lives

Pas­sive immu­ni­ty: Pas­sive immu­ni­ty is “bor­rowed” from anoth­er source and it lasts for a short time.

source

MRNA Vac­cines employ a method of intro­duc­tion to the human immune sys­tem that by pass­es the nor­mal human immu­ni­ty response.

Not every­one needs to be inoc­u­lat­ed, some peo­ple have aller­gies that could cre­ate severe risk so say­ing that every­one needs to be vac­ci­nat­ed is not only ridicu­lous but incred­i­bly igno­rant. source. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations/specific-groups/allergies.html

Every per­son is dif­fer­ent.

We eat dif­fer­ent foods, we devel­op dif­fer­ent immu­ni­ties because this is how the human body has evolved.

Because we are all dif­fer­ent cre­at­ing a vac­cine that pro­duces a sin­gle dimen­sion anti-body response which is pred­i­cat­ed upon the same RNA using a mes­sen­ger to deliv­er this (instruc­tion to the body) is not how the body nor­mal­ly responds to a viral threat.

The real truth is that we do not real­ly know what we can expect from these MRNA vac­cines because it has not been stud­ied.

It is Exper­i­men­tal.

Now hav­ing said that does that mean that these Vac­cines are dan­ger­ous to the pop­u­la­tion as a whole?

We do not know that as yet.

That would be the most sci­en­tif­ic answer how­ev­er if you are inclined to gam­ble then we could say that it is some­what unlike­ly that these vac­cines would cause wide spread health issues but it is also impor­tant to under­stand that because we do not have sup­port­ing clin­i­cal data we will not have com­plete answers for up to five years.

It might well be revealed that there will be a cer­tain per­cent­age of the pop­u­la­tion that might expe­ri­ence some long term immune relat­ed dis­eases.

I trust my doc­tor.

When it comes down to it IF my doc­tor said that I need­ed to be vac­ci­nat­ed then I would like­ly fol­low that advice, I would eval­u­ate that advice and then make a deci­sion.

But as it is I have already had C19 and it was a very mild short lived ill­ness that was not very dis­rup­tive to my over­all health.

So, at this time tak­ing a vac­cine that man­ages a response that is not at this time nec­es­sary because of nat­ur­al immu­ni­ty is in this case is pre­ferred to the MRNA vac­cine.

Every­one should decide based on their own indi­vid­ual health and cir­cum­stances.

Per­son­al­ly I find it dif­fi­cult to under­stand this idea that vac­ci­na­tion ver­sus nat­ur­al immu­ni­ty some­how cre­ates the need for paper­work or proof of immu­ni­ty.

One thing that I can say with cer­tain­ty is that when you see com­mer­cials for med­ica­tions on TV and you hear the pos­si­ble issues with tak­ing that med­ica­tion.

Those dis­claimers are in place to deter law­suits.

How­ev­er Those med­ica­tions and the com­pa­nies that mar­ket those med­ica­tions are not exclud­ed from law­suits.

So they dis­close pub­licly all the dif­fer­ent things that might go wrong based on clin­i­cal sci­ence.

They know that of the hun­dreds of thou­sands of peo­ple who will take the med­ica­tions some peo­ple are going to have seri­ous prob­lems.

IF on the oth­er hand those med­ica­tions and those com­pa­nies were giv­en a pass and exclud­ed from the risk of a law­suit? I would chal­lenge you this would they still warn you of poten­tial prob­lems?

Or would they just say its safe and effec­tive?

Some­thing to think about.