Media complicit!

One might won­der if indeed the media were com­plic­it in the dis­turb­ing issues that appeared to take one can­di­date that had almost no cam­paign and per­haps may even have demen­tia and added thou­sands of unver­i­fied votes. It may even be pos­si­ble that many of these were estab­lished dig­i­tal­ly with­out a paper tri­al of any kind.

Dur­ing the Elec­tion cov­er­age the Media instant­ly showed estab­lished leads that would tend to make the pub­lic believe that the Biden cam­paign were far ahead of the Trump cam­paign.

The Media even made state­ments about ear­ly vot­ing was the rea­son but when it became clear that there were far more Trump Votes than there were Biden Votes, some­thing hap­pened.

Reports start­ing com­ing in that bal­lot count­ing would stop…

Then lat­er they start­ed count­ing again only some­thing very odd start­ed to hap­pen leads where the Trump Cam­paign had well estab­lished supe­ri­or­i­ty were erased but there was no equal relat­ed vote for down tick­et can­di­dates… This is a seri­ous sig­nal that some­thing bad hap­pened and now the Media is yelling (with their bul­ly mega­phone) that any­one who thinks that some­thing unto­ward hap­pened is crazy… But we know human nature! If you spend any amount of time inves­ti­gat­ing crime you know that peo­ple are capa­ble of just about any­thing. In fact if it were not for the occa­sion­al redemp­tive human inter­est sto­ry you would soon begin to expect that almost any­one is capa­ble of very bad behav­ior indeed.

This is not some­thing that is an opin­ion, Oh no no no, this is fact humans do some real­ly messed up stuff and they do it for a lot of real­ly messed up rea­sons. Some peo­ple end up involved in crim­i­nal issues and they nev­er real­ly meant to get involved but through igno­rance or being sus­cep­ti­ble to coer­cion they end up in as much or more trou­ble than the per­son that cre­at­ed the issue to begin with.

These peo­ple are for the most part good peo­ple but they some­how for­got to apply the brakes when they should have said No way, I am not going to do that, I sus­pect there are a lot of peo­ple out there that know exact­ly what is going on in regard to this elec­tion tam­per­ing inves­ti­ga­tion and hope­ful­ly those peo­ple will come for­ward and sup­ply vital evi­dence before they end up get­ting caught any­way.

Often you see these issues pop up then go away because there is not enough evi­dence to sup­port an inves­ti­ga­tion but that is not the case here. There is sig­nif­i­cant evi­dence and there are wit­ness­es, Videos, like­ly even a paper trail. (The pre­ced­ing state­ment is not based on any fac­tu­al evi­dence but from expe­ri­ence in field inter­ro­ga­tions and like­ly human intel­li­gence when inex­pe­ri­enced sub­jects are involved in activ­i­ty either they do not ful­ly under­stand or are involved unwill­ing­ly) When you begin to exam­ine these issues a num­ber of red flags present them­selves and like­ly there is sig­nif­i­cant foren­sic val­ue in inter­view­ing sub­jects con­cern­ing state­ments obtained by poll work­ers who may have become alarmed when it became appar­ent that what they thought was true turned out to be sig­nif­i­cant­ly dif­fer­ent than the per­cep­tion the sub­ject thought were the facts of the case. This hap­pens fre­quent­ly in many cas­es where sub­jects who had no pri­or crim­i­nal his­to­ry sud­den­ly became involved in a crim­i­nal inves­ti­ga­tion. Any one of these issues might tend to make any inves­ti­ga­tor sus­pi­cious how­ev­er giv­en the high­er num­ber of votes that had to be inval­i­dat­ed in order to sup­ply one polit­i­cal cam­paign with a per­ceived advan­tage they like­ly had to engage in activ­i­ty that would be much eas­i­er to detect. In stud­ies involv­ing foren­sic exam­i­na­tion of invalid bal­lots it was deter­mined that it was very dif­fi­cult to detect bal­lot manip­u­la­tion when the amount of said tam­per­ing was low, few­er than 7 per­cent was almost unde­tectable. But high­er num­bers proved to be very detectable. (IF reports about num­bers are cor­rect then there is a strong pos­si­bil­i­ty that these unknown sub­jects may have man­u­fac­tured up to 40 per­cent of some vot­ing blocks) The prob­lem here is that they could have got­ten away with it had they not attempt­ed to manip­u­late such a large per­cent­age of the vote in coun­ties with long ver­i­fied vot­ing pro­files. As it stands the Media attempt­ing to yell and scream and call peo­ple names instead of actu­al­ly inves­ti­gat­ing the bal­lots in ques­tion does noth­ing to dis­pel the sus­pi­cions. In fact it height­ens the per­cep­tion that some­thing is very wrong because for the most part what the media does all the time is to lie about the truth!

Sim­ply Stat­ed! The Media can­not be trust­ed!