What we have here is a fail­ure to com­mu­ni­cate.

Deputies called to suspected shooter’s home 39 times over seven years

source.

What?

Are you kidding me…

If some­one is obvi­ous­ly men­tal­ly ill enough to be a risk to him­self and oth­ers as well as the com­mu­ni­ty then why did law enforce­ment respond to this alleged shooter’s address so many times and yet there was still no action tak­en…Just con­sid­er what this means…

We are talk­ing about enact­ing addi­tion­al gun con­trol laws to stop the sit­u­a­tion in park­land Flori­da.

That is what con­gress is talk­ing about fix­ing what caused this prob­lem?

That is frankly offensive.

What this should demon­strate here is that gun con­trol laws are not the way to fix this issue.

What caused this prob­lem was a fail­ure of the “Author­i­ties” to take some evi­dent action in terms of this “Risk”

39 times 39 opportunities to stop the needless loss of life.

Tell me what gun con­trol law will fix that prob­lem?

The only peo­ple that could real­ly stop this prob­lem were not able to do it.

What laws that are not already on the books that are not already in place would make a dif­fer­ence?

When you first begin to think that you can stop the actions of some­one that is an obvi­ous risk what makes you think that any law passed would actu­al­ly have an effect when some­thing this out in the open could go on and no one did any­thing at all to stop it?

That is what is tru­ly mad­den­ing here is we have a group of peo­ple that want to push an agen­da that has failed over and over again and yet we have a pres­i­dent and con­gress that appear to be eager­ly ris­ing to the media “bait”

They appear to have no rea­son­ing skills when it comes to fig­ur­ing out what to do to reduce the oppor­tu­ni­ty for these hor­ri­ble sit­u­a­tions to take place.

So what is hap­pen­ing here is that we have peo­ple talk­ing about doing what for­mer Pres­i­dent Oba­ma was plan­ning on doing.

That is the solu­tion that you peo­ple believe is going to be effec­tive?

Real­ly think about it because that is exact­ly what the democ­rats and some repub­li­cans and in fact appar­ent­ly the Pres­i­dent…

They are talk­ing about pro­fil­ing mil­lions of peo­ple who have com­mit­ted no crimes, who have not bro­ken any laws, who in fact are not even a risk at all but hey who cares right, for­get the law lets just take their guns.

(SUBJECTIVE REASONING)

The sub­jec­tive part of this is some con­vo­lut­ed idea that the esti­mat­ed 39 mil­lion peo­ple who are tak­ing med­ica­tions are all not fit to have a gun?

Really?

The real prob­lem is not sub­jec­tive but OBJECTIVE risk.

Less than five peo­ple in five years have been on med­ica­tion and pro­ceed­ed to do hor­ri­ble things and guess what not all of them were done with a gun many more were done with knives.

So doing the esti­mat­ed math here there are more than 30 mil­lion peo­ple out there that are tak­ing med­ica­tions and are not com­mit­ting crimes.

These mil­lions and mil­lions of peo­ple are not hav­ing law enforce­ment show up to their homes.

They are not a risk but with this new gun con­trol bill and the “blan­ket type” sub­jec­tive idea that any­one on med­ica­tion is a poten­tial risk…

That is the same kind of sick men­tal­i­ty that cre­at­ed the oppor­tu­ni­ty for the mur­der of hun­dreds of thou­sands of unarmed civil­ians.

That is how it starts, you put a blan­ket law into place and then in the “name” of pre­vent­ing bad things from hap­pen­ing they come and they take all of your guns.

Then a few years down the road some­thing hor­ri­ble hap­pens and all those peo­ple that depend on the laws to pro­tect them find out just how use­less a law can be when crim­i­nals show up with the inten­tion of doing you harm.

Gun con­trol has failed it is time to do some­thing that actu­al­ly works.

Pro­tect our chil­dren as well as you pro­tect the judges and lawyers in your local court hous­es.

That is some­thing you can do that will actu­al­ly work.