Categories
Politics

hope and change

So how is that hope and change working out for you, with foreclosures at an all time high in fact so many foreclosures are now in process, that many banks have gone out of business, because they allegeldy could not keep up with all the paperwork, amazing I know but I wonder how this young lady feels about her gas tank now?

Categories
Politics

Sheppard Smith Racist?

Is sheppard smith a racist?

In an interview on national TV, sheppard smith allegedly was rude and insensative, to a black man, but why did he act the way that he did was there some reason behind that behavior?  The story was about how invasive the department of family and children services, can be when they thought that a woman was using drugs during pregnancy.

However, at some point the woman was compelled to do a drug test and that in itself was the story yet Shep Smith seemed to not understand what the story was about. 

There is a consitutional issue here, a woman was forced to testify against her will, the test was faulty, as a result the state took her child away from her, and she lost something more valuable than you can imagine, time, they took 75 days away from this woman.

the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment applies to the states by
way of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The fifth amendment,
“nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be
deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;”

This woman was allegedly unfairly treated and allegedly was forced to testify against herself, that is a violation of the constitution.

But apparently that was not of interest to Shepard Smith, why was he allegedly acting so allegedly badly?

The story was that the Young lady was accused of doing drugs during pregnancy, because her child had a seizure now this begs the question, why was the mother automatically suspected of doing drugs, because allegedly it is not uncommon for a child to have a seizure, though it is a disturbing thing to see, it can happen and not be the result of any kind of drug use by the mother.

Sheppard Smith approached the story, being very skeptical, he called it “the poppy defence” but what probable cause actually existed at the time this woman was compelled to testify against herself?

Why did sheppard smith act the way he did toward the womans attorney?

Sheppard Smith asked a question that was unfair (allegedly) and it was a question that was impossible to answer.

He asked, was the woman still suspected of doing drugs?

Since he was asking her attorney, a question that only the state could answer, it was not possible for her attorney to answer what was in the mind or mentation of the DFCAS, so again, why did Sheppard Smith act so rudly, would he have treated a white attorney the same way as he treated the black man?  We may never know the answer to that question, but it is a problem because Fox news continues to generate news that is less than fair and less than ballanced, yet they claim to be fair and ballanced.

Fair and Ballanced, are more than just words, they are the pillars, of the foundation of our way of life.

Fairness, is what caused this nation to be born, Ballance, is what justice is all about but when you have a media company that bends the presentation of facts to suit what ever opinion they might have at the time, (allegedly) it can be a real issue because we need real news, not opinion, without fact, that can be had anywhere at any price.

I hope that fox news gets its collective act together soon because they are one side of a complex media puzzle, there is a problem with one sided coverage, and that may be why sometimes it may seem as if Fox news, goes a little over board on its coverage, (allegedly)

However, that is really not the entire story here.

 

 

 

 

Categories
Politics

Can Casey Anthony get a fair trial?

Guilty as charged, that is what we will see, and why is that you may ask?

Why wait, for a verdict, everyone knows that she is guilty, right?

Everyone knows it because the media has told us for days, that they "think" she is guilty.

Simple, this case was tried in the court of public opinion and it was tried in the media.

But ask your self one thing, if Casey Anthony is so stupid, and such a monster, how did she manage to leave no evidence behind?

There are a lot of implications in the idea that this trial has been for the most part played out in the media.

When you have personal opinion presented as fact, can anyone have a fair trial is this the end of the justice system as we know it. 

There are indications allegedly that the judge may not be fair minded in his approach to adjudicating, this case allegedly he has sided with the prosecuting agency in allegedly 98 percent of the objections.   Even in stupid cases, the average is 78 percent allegedly.

That is a difference of 20 percent allegedly give or take a percentage point or two, the thing that is really amazing here is that you have what appears to be bias from allegedly the judge in this case, so what is up with that, if it is true can this young lady (I know some people think that she is guilty and should be tired and executed in the press)

The thing is should a media company have only one point of view?

Can this girl get a fair trial, when the media is constantly and allegedly presenting only a biased point of view can she get a fair trial, just curious because it looks like everyone in the world is convinced, that this girl murdered her own child and there is no proof, period, nothing the prosecution has presented is real allegedly they can prove nothing about her actual connection to this tragedy, now, is this woman morally responsible for her child, (Yes certainly) and she should be punished, but without proof can we begin to start putting people to death?

Should the media only present one side of an issue, considering that this is a life and death care, should the media be allegedly biased?

That is something that is serious and it is something that people should seriously consider.

Categories
Politics

Debbie does DC

Ok, that sounds like a bad movie, but the thing is when you see some of the obvious disconnection between the DNC and the American public you have to wonder just what they are thinking and why are they even in office in the first place.

Here is an attractive young lady, (ok perhaps not so young, but still attractive) until she opens her mouth and begins to spin a web of support for topics that sometimes might be better off left alone.

It might seem obvious to some that little miss cant be wrong otherwise known as Debbie Wasserman-Schultz the alleged truth is she is just too cute to be voted out, I mean if she were at all obvious about her intellect, she might be a serious political threat to the DNC.

However that little issue may be all that she ever aspires to obtain.

Is she not just so cute?