Categories
bill hemmer bill oreilly bill orielly cnn democratic liars democrats in congress democrats out democrats tax lies dictator dictotor distust drain the swamp fox and friends fox news fox news biased news government shut down gridlock harry reid resign harry reid to blame harry reid unconstitutional

Media Bias

The Media does not like the tea party, no surprise there as it has long been established that the media is not really that impartial in its reporting of the news, however it begs the question that should be something everyone is talking about, which is how can the media only present one side of a situation, and still be trusted?

Think about that for a moment, The media has been presenting only one part of the story, only one perspective, even Fox news which has become one of the more popular media outlets, is sliding over to one view, they say that they are fair and ballanced, but are they really?  Bill hemmer, Bill, orielly, Shepard Smith,  all tend to present Bias in their coverage, they want you to believe that they are presenting news and facts, but is that really accurate?

Bill orielly, says the spin stops here, but when he engages in favoring one side over another, when he only covers one side of an issue and talks over anyone Else’s opinion, then is that not his own “spin” I find it hard to swallow that Bill is not having some kind of mental issue, (allegedly) but I guess that is to be expected as he has a history of this in his family, and that is to be expected, however there is a thin line between reality and fantasy, and Bill sometimes I think gets lost in that thin line.

This was just received in an email and it is compelling, the Media is against the tea party, but why is that?

Dear Patriot,

Something incredible has been happening over the last few days, and it was every loyal member of the Tea Party Movement that made it happen! If you’ve been following the news, you’ve heard nearly every political commentator comment on the fact that Speaker John Boehner was forced to change his original plan twice because he couldn’t muster the 216 votes to get it passed. The general commentary goes like this: “In the past, Speaker Boehner could have given away money for a bridge or a library to buy the votes he needed, but the Tea Party banned earmarks so he doesn’t have that luxury.” Many of these old media dinosaurs speak with disdain when they make this point, as though by stripping the Congress of their currency of corruption (earmarks) is a bad thing; they just don’t get it! You should feel extremely proud of what those of us in the Tea Party have done–we have changed the entire culture inside Congress!

Now, if a politician wants to get the votes to pass legislation, he better be able to win on the merits of that legislation. It’s no longer an option to trade an unprincipled vote to fund some absurd pet project. No more “cornhusker kickbacks” for Ben Nelson in Nebraska; no more “Louisiana purchase” for Mary Landrieu in exchange for the passage of the dangerous Obamacare. This is the first example of how we are going to stop the flow of terrible legislation from Washington.

I’m so proud to have played my small role, and I’m genuinely hopeful that as we continue to grow, “We The People” will be able to preserve the blessings of liberty for our children and grandchildren! The fight over the debt ceiling continues but already we’ve secured important victories by changing the process. This organization will continue to recruit tens of thousands of new patriots each and every week, and we’ll continue to provide the latest and best tools to make all of us more effective activists. TOGETHER, WE WILL WIN!

The most incredible part is we have put all of this infrastructure together without having to sell our souls to anyone. We’re entirely funded by patriots just like you who make an average contribution of less than $60! This truly is a historic day for the direction of country and we remain humbled by your continued support.
 
Thank you,
Dustin Stockton
Media Director

Categories
Politics

Sheppard Smith Racist?

Is sheppard smith a racist?

In an interview on national TV, sheppard smith allegedly was rude and insensative, to a black man, but why did he act the way that he did was there some reason behind that behavior?  The story was about how invasive the department of family and children services, can be when they thought that a woman was using drugs during pregnancy.

However, at some point the woman was compelled to do a drug test and that in itself was the story yet Shep Smith seemed to not understand what the story was about. 

There is a consitutional issue here, a woman was forced to testify against her will, the test was faulty, as a result the state took her child away from her, and she lost something more valuable than you can imagine, time, they took 75 days away from this woman.

the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment applies to the states by
way of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The fifth amendment,
“nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be
deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;”

This woman was allegedly unfairly treated and allegedly was forced to testify against herself, that is a violation of the constitution.

But apparently that was not of interest to Shepard Smith, why was he allegedly acting so allegedly badly?

The story was that the Young lady was accused of doing drugs during pregnancy, because her child had a seizure now this begs the question, why was the mother automatically suspected of doing drugs, because allegedly it is not uncommon for a child to have a seizure, though it is a disturbing thing to see, it can happen and not be the result of any kind of drug use by the mother.

Sheppard Smith approached the story, being very skeptical, he called it “the poppy defence” but what probable cause actually existed at the time this woman was compelled to testify against herself?

Why did sheppard smith act the way he did toward the womans attorney?

Sheppard Smith asked a question that was unfair (allegedly) and it was a question that was impossible to answer.

He asked, was the woman still suspected of doing drugs?

Since he was asking her attorney, a question that only the state could answer, it was not possible for her attorney to answer what was in the mind or mentation of the DFCAS, so again, why did Sheppard Smith act so rudly, would he have treated a white attorney the same way as he treated the black man?  We may never know the answer to that question, but it is a problem because Fox news continues to generate news that is less than fair and less than ballanced, yet they claim to be fair and ballanced.

Fair and Ballanced, are more than just words, they are the pillars, of the foundation of our way of life.

Fairness, is what caused this nation to be born, Ballance, is what justice is all about but when you have a media company that bends the presentation of facts to suit what ever opinion they might have at the time, (allegedly) it can be a real issue because we need real news, not opinion, without fact, that can be had anywhere at any price.

I hope that fox news gets its collective act together soon because they are one side of a complex media puzzle, there is a problem with one sided coverage, and that may be why sometimes it may seem as if Fox news, goes a little over board on its coverage, (allegedly)

However, that is really not the entire story here.

 

 

 

 

Categories
Politics

Casey Anthony lies?

This entire trial is like a three ring circus, with the media daily speculating about all the crazy things you might see in a situation like this and peopel foaming at the mouth that do not know as much as the defense in this case knows about the trial, you have to wonder about the talking heads in the media, what makes them think that they are smart enought to figure any thing out?

So has this judge allowed a proper trial or should he be investigated for alleged ethics violations?

 

This is getting just crazy, when you listen to the talking heads at Fox news, like Shepard Smith, you hear this guy talking trash at every turn. So, can this girl get a fair trial with a judge that allegedly is biased and should be allegedly recused from this case. unqualified to perform legal duties because of a possible conflict of interest or lack of impartiality

Should the judge be dismissed?

Should fox news talking heads be so opinionated, after all they are talking about life and death here. When you see the news coverage that is laced with biased information, you have to wonder how anyone could have a fair trial in these circumstances. When you see Fox new Headlines like,

(is the Casey Anthony Defense Falling apart?)

You have to ask how is it possible for a defendant to get a fair trial when you have the entire media against you. You see biased statement after biased statement, yet, no real evidence most of this stuff is so flimsy you could read a newspaper through it. How would you like to have to try to defend yourself under these circumstances. The truth here is that the media is biased and the judge could also be biased.