Categories
Politics

Polls are they accurate?

Polls can you ever really be sure that they are even scientific at all?

Subjective data can never be trusted as valid?

When you think about it, what they are doing is rife for subjective analysis, it reeks in many ways of impure science that is often portrayed by the media as some kind of holy grail of political correctness when in reality it is hardly accurate at all.

We see polls here and Polls there, one poll contradicts another, and no one ever seems to cover the disparity…

We are always see these polls being presented by the media as some kind of predictive method that is so right that they have to design a mathematical plus or minus sign next to the figures they “come up with” the thing is are these “polls accurate at all”

 Are polls biased?

This morning some poll or another, was released, that showed, that a certain percent of a certain percent, of some people that might vote or might not vote in the next election, have some kind of negative view of the tea party.

How do they come up with those figures, are those methods really reliable?

Scientific analysis, or scientific sampling, is a process where you attempt to “sample” a group of Americans, (some of which might or might not be here legally) and you try to get some kind of information from them, however, where do they live and do they live in a particular area where one viewpoint might be held over another, and is that process fair?

The idea that someone who wanted to project a particular method they know would get the result they wanted, is really a little suspect. When you look at that situation it is fraught with dangers, in subjective analysis, that process is not really scientific, the numbers they come up with may be scientific, but the process and the method they use, may not be subjective at all. So when you see it on TV, and they say this is the latest poll, what are they really saying? This might be very subjective, it might even be biased, (allegedly) it might not be really even accurate at all?

Are they saying that the stature of liberty was really made by aliens from outer space? Are they saying that the Ghost busters, are going to be repairing the statue of liberty? Are they saying that in some universe that we are yet unaware of that the social ramifications of Goldilocks and the three bears is somehow a topic of interest to some strange alter ego? Sounds crazy right, like some kind of yellow journalism or some kind of strange tabloid headline. The funny thing here is that you could get some kind of poll numbers on any of those strange subjects, above, are they really important at all? Not really, simply the thing here is that polls do not really reflect the American public, because the sampling is too low and it is not widely dispersed, and it is not done in an objective manner.

Yet, you see this morning on the Today show, a tag line saying “allegedly” Tea party, the politics of Anger? This is the kind of biased journalism that many have come to expect what would those people do if somehow CNN started actually reporting the news what would happen then? Would pigs fly? Perhaps, because that may be what it takes to get some of these allegedly very biased news or entertainment companies to do the right thing and start reporting again…

Until then hope you find a better method of getting your news, or you could just get it here, you will not find any yellow journalism here….

Categories
kellys court

subjective lie detector

The idea that you have on one hand a very subjective analysis that is not an acceptable method of detecting a lie, because the process is subjective.

The Ultimate Catch 22

This idea that if a lie detector test is subjectively failed, according to a subjective opinion, yet at the same time, if a lie detector test is passed, most of the time you hear the old “Well lie detector tests are not admissible in court”

Ok, you know what, you cannot have it both ways, either it is accurate, or it is not accurate, and science tells us that it is in fact NOT accurate, the reason why it is not accurate, is that it is totally dependent upon the operators subjective analysis of subjective material.

Simply stated, subjective, analysis of Subjective material, yields a subjective result,
(There is not such thing as a Lie detector test)

It simply does not exist because it is based on an unscientific method…

That is a real problem and when you have someone that is made to “take” a test the only thing that is going to happen every single time is that doubt will be cast, upon that persons honesty, all based on a subjective opinion, you could also take ten operators, and get ten different opinions, this is why it is not scientifically relevant in court, because science does not support this method.

Today, on Kellys court a popular fox news segment, allowed a report to be published that might have been inappropriate, for a number of reasons, one of which was that a member of the staff reported that the person that “took” or was subjected to the test, “Miserably failed” the test, now that is just not really accurate, (allegedly)

That is actually not right at all, (allegedly)

It is ok to say that someone was deceptive, or that the test was inconclusive but to say that someone failed a test “using an adjective like miserably” is not only Unprofessional, but could actually be illegal.

The idea that fox news participated in this kind of subjective analytical process is disturbing.

Categories
Politics

climate change

Hot, that is the buzz word over the last few weeks it has been truly hotter for many locations.

 Is the movie 2012 as fictional as it is might it be somewhat accurate in the terms of natural disasters that we may some day soon face.

Are we about to face the end of days?

It could be true, but who knows for sure, science is like a guessing game, and any serious scientist will
tell you that this is accurate.  Science is not perfect, because people are not perfect.  We make mistakes,
but hey that is just the way that it is. Still this news story today that climate change could be coming in
five years, is really interesting, because as far as I know its getting colder now. 

We have four seasons.

Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter, however if these so called
“scientists are correct”

But, what if they are right and we are about to see a new ice age?

Since, there is little that could be done anyway, about the only thing you could
do would be to have a big party…

Seriously, if the world is about to end, you have to know that there is nothing
that you can do to stop it, so have a party…

 

Categories
Politics

Gingrich, cannot win

Newt may be a smart man, but apparently he is not smart enough to realize that his desire to rule, will likely leave him broke with no votes.

NO way to win…

The following headline appears in the Christen Science monitor,

(which is sort of a misnomer in itself)

Has Newt Gingrich been on TV too long to get elected?

After 30 years in the public eye, Newt Gingrich has video-clip documentation of countless past opinions. Can he still present a fresh message to the American electorate?

There are a lot of people who are wondering why Gingrich would enter the race because it is allegedly very obvious that he cannot win and he may well selfishly create great harm to the GOP is he really on the right side of the political debate with all his baggage it is really interesting that this misguided man (allegedly) should not just go ahead and save his money instead of wasting so much money…

Why?

The guy is just not likable, (allegedly) I mean you look at him and the first thing you think is that he will never ever be the president, so really why is he wasting his time and money…

Think about that, why is he wasting his money, allegedly he sold out a long time ago, so really who will even waste their alleged vote on him in the first place.

Categories
Politics

Hope and Change? or the end of america?

Seriously is this the hope and change you wanted?

Is this the End of what our fathers fought and died to create for us, A Better America?

Are we seeing the destruction of America because of a small percentage of out of control Liberals?

Perhaps you may have heard about job killing bills that Washington has created, with huge numbers of unemployed, is it wise to pass bills that prevent small business companies from growing?

Small business drive this economy, without the millions of small business owners this nation would expire, This bill is Evil and must be defeated, H.R. 1249  must be defeated and those that signed it must be voted out of office because they are as evil as this bill is evil, men that would support this bill are not Americans they are alleged, trash and not fit for office and should be recalled.

My Friends I received this in an email and it is disturbing, and not surprising that we have a radical crew, of individuals that are dedicated to allowing unconstitutional changes to the very fabric of our way of life, on the surface it may not seem like much, but when you really look at what they are proposing in the Senate we must stop this evil bill, that would effectively put an end to the American Dream of being an inventor.

H.R. 1249  Will Kill our nation, it will destroy our way of life, it is fashioned after the European style of government, my friends this is not Europe, and perhaps it is time to send Washington a message that anyone who thinks they are living in Europe should leave now, because We the people know where we live, WE know our history, it is time for this nonsense to stop, it is time to vote these dirt bags out of office, they are attempting to sell our way of life right out from under our feet.

When will American learn…

 

This would take away the opportunity of the average man

It robs the American of everything that makes us free.

It is Abhorrent and it comes from the Liberal Controlled Senate.

I urge you to consider what it would mean if only large corporations control patents, and inventions?

What would it mean if a large corporation could patent the way that you spell your name, did you know that they could make you pay a fee every-time you signed your name, I know it sounds crazy and stupid, but if this is allowed to go through it will stop our economy dead in its tracts, for no one will ever want to try to invent anything any more.

Please read this it is important.

Please take time to read this and please do what you can to spread the word this is the most disgusting thing I have read in a long time, and again understand that at first you may think it does not matter but when you really read what they want to do, you will understand that it favors large corporations over Americans, it favors law that was created outside of American values, it is not the American Way it is Unconstitutional and it is Evil.

Fellow Citizen,

While Washington is busy arguing loudly and slowly about government shutdowns, Obama and his allies in both parties are being awfully quick and quiet about their plan to take away our Constitutional property rights and bail out their multinational corporate friends with trillions of dollars in new wealth transfers. The Orwellian name of this destructive legislation is the “America Invents Act” (H.R. 1249). We call it “ObamaPatent.” It’s unconstitutional; it will harm small business and innovation; and it will destroy jobs.

They know you will find out about this legislative scheme. So they’re skipping the usual House subcommittee action on the bill and trying to ram this bill through the full committee and the House before you know what’s happening.

There’s no time to lose. Join me today and help stop H.R. 1249 ObamaPatent:

Email me at defendmyrights@americasjobcreators.com. Put “Yes, I want to help stop ObamaPatent” in the subject line. I will follow up with you directly to coordinate our strategy.

The next day that Congress is open for business, call your Representative.

U.S. House switchboard at (202) 224-3121 and ask for your Representative by name. Once you are connected to the office, ask for the staff member who handles patents. Tell him/her that H.R. 1249 America Invents Act is unconstitutional because it changes the patent system established in Article I Section 8 Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution. Tell them to keep America’s Constitutional First-To-Invent patent system. Tell them you will be watching their vote on H.R. 1249, the America Invents Act. Tell them it’s time to stand up for the Constitution and for the creation of jobs we so desperately need.

Like you, I’m a regular American.

I’m a husband and father of two, a former police and SWAT officer, a small businessman and a technology innovator and entrepreneur. I founded the Maui TEA Party and co-founded the Hawaii TEA Party and served as its first President. I did this because, like you, I know that government spending and power are out of control. You can verify who I am at newleadersolutions.com and our coalition of conservatives at americasjobcreators.com.

Candidate Obama said he was five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.
Boy, he wasn’t kidding.

As his onslaught of grossly anti-American and pro-European-style plans, policies, and projects continues, it’s hard to keep track of them all. Yet, here’s another, and here’s why this one really matters.

Obama, his Democrat allies, and many “tenured” Republicans are working with some of the world’s largest multinational corporations to “harmonize” America’s patent system with those of Europe and Japan. They are trying to weaken the American system (currently the best in the world) to match the systems used by these foreign countries.

Just this week, Obama’s patent chief, David Kappos, was at an international elitist meeting in London proclaiming to the EU that the goal of the proposed ObamaPatent system is “global harmonization.” Kappos referred to our nation’s Constitutional patent system as “19th Century” and “bizarre.” Sounds like Obama’s global apology tour, but now they are apologizing for our Constitution.

Why care about patents? If we Americans can’t control the fruits of our own inventions and technology, our country will quickly become a technology and jobs backwater.

Intellectual property (e.g. patents, copyrights) is the currency of the new economy.
But its crucial importance to job creation and growth was recognized long ago by our Founding Fathers.

When they wrote the Constitution, the founders specifically included the revolutionary idea of awarding patents — not to the king’s favorites such as was common practice in England and elsewhere — but to the individual person who actually came up with the invention. This is known as the First-To-Invent patent system and was established by Article I Section 8 Clause 8 of the Constitution, which states:

“To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.”

The founders’ radical First-To-Invent approach to patent awards instantaneously leveled the playing field between the little guy building the dream technology of tomorrow in his workshop or garage and the giant, entrenched, multinational corporate interests that always seek to dampen disruptive innovation to protect their dominant market share. By awarding patents to the actual inventor, our Founding Fathers incentivized innovation by and for everyone and unleashed the American know-how that has helped power our country’s economic and military success for over 224 years.

Who benefits most from America’s Constitutional First-To-Invent patent award system? The little guy, the small, medium and independent businesses, the innovators, America’s middle class, the people who, literally, fought for and built this country and made it great, the people who live in and are loyal to this country. (Come to think of it, I just described the grassroots of the TEA Party movement).

Under ObamaPatent, the U.S. will adopt the European system and award the patent to the first entity to file a claim to new technology. Given the cost, complexity, and delay of the patent filing process, ObamaPatent will tilt the playing field sharply in favor of large, multinational, entrenched business interests. Then, America’s technology, industries, and jobs will move even more quickly overseas.

In this master stroke, Obama rewards his large corporate donors (think General Electric, which is a big proponent of ObamaPatent) with a cheaper and easier way to steal American technology and take it overseas. And, Obama simultaneously undercuts the small and independent business people who are the core of the TEA Party and reduces private sector manufacturing jobs, thus forcing more voters into government employment, onto the dole, and into ObamaCare. And he gets to weaken America’s economy and military, all at the same time. Brilliant!!

The great majority of legal scholars who have examined Obama’s First-To-File patent system have concluded that it violates Article I Section 8 Clause 8, and that ObamaPatent’s First-To-File system is unconstitutional. No scholar has yet asserted that Obama’s First-To-File system is constitutional. But, as I re-discovered two weeks ago in my first trip back to DC in 20 years, Congress doesn’t care much about what the Constitution says.

Like ObamaCare, ObamaPatent is an unconstitutional and unholy alliance between big government and big business harming the rest of us.

This legislation is moving fast. It has already passed the Senate and its House equivalent, H.R. 1249, is moving quickly. Many GOP members are helping Obama with his plan.

There’s no time to lose. Analysts agree that the only ones who can stop ObamaPatent now are America’s Constitutional conservatives and TEA Party citizens like you and me.

Please pass this information on to your family, friends and fellow citizens. Ask them to join us in stopping this unconstitutional, multinational power grab and jobs destroyer.

Sincerely,
Marc Hodges
AmericasJobCreators.com

P.S. America’s Midwest and manufacturing states will be hit especially hard by ObamaPatent. I will be in Western Ohio April 14 to 21 working with grassroots conservatives to stop ObamaPatent. If you are in Western Ohio or nearby, email me and we’ll get together.

Conservatives that have joined the coalition to stop ObamaPatent include:

Phyllis Schlafly
Eagle Forum
Edwin Meese, III
Former Attorney General of the United States
Kevin L. Kearns
US Business and Industry Council
Morton Blackwell
Chairman, Weyrich Lunch
Colin A. Hanna,
Let Freedom Ring
Larry Hart
American Conservative Union
Dr. Richard Land
Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious Liberty Convention
Jim Martin
60 Plus
C. Preston Noell
Tradition, Family, Property
Larry Pratt
Gun Owners of America
Ron Pearson
Council for America
Susan Carlson
American Civil Rights Union
Jim Backlin
Christian Coalition
Kenneth R. Timmerman
Author and Former President,
Maryland Taxpayers Association
Col. Charles Thomann (Ret.)
Patriotic Veterans, Inc.
Frank Gaffney
Center for Security Policy
Paul Caprio
Family PAC Federal
Gary Aldrich
Liberty Central
William H. Shaker
RepublicanPAC.com
Jeff Gaynor
Americans for Sovereignty
Dr. John Holmes
Association of Christian Schools International
Suhail A. Khan
Conservative Inclusion Coalition
Peter Knickerbocker
WeReadTheConstitution.com
Ambassador Henry F. Cooper
High Frontier
Jon Utley
American Conservative Magazine
Star Parker
Coalition for Urban Renewable and Education
John Kerr, Maui TEA Party
Donna Sweere, Kona TEA Party
Rick Toledo, Hilo TEA Party
Ray Santagnelo, West Hawaii Patriots