Did George Zimmerman actually do something good?
Perhaps he did, but it seems interesting that some media outlets only dropped the reference to Zimmerman being a White/Hispanic only for this story, does that make sense at all?
Advertisers should be ashamed to advertise on these news companies that play games with the lives of people for profit.
Imagine for just a moment that you are interested in learning about political science…
Now imagine that the last place on earth that you will see any of that is not on the allegedly biased media outlets.
In many ways this is not only a tragedy but an evil situation where a hand full of producers decide what you see and hear.
Many Large Business and CEOs Announced layoffs just days after the election results.
Think about how many thousands and thousands of people who will loose their jobs this year before Christmas.
That is something that you should carefully consider.
This is a news story that you will not see on regular TV…
Does that concern you?
You will not see this news story on CBS, NBC, MSNBC, ABC, you will not even see it on FOX news.
This is why the Internet is becoming the new DE-facto alternative to biased and state sponsored media outlets.
Just now CBS insinuated, that there is now a mandate from the American people to tax the rich, but we know that the vote was split, much like this nation has been split, 49/51
There is a foolish contingent of people in the media that are ignorant and they are literally unable to figure out how the real world is because they do not live in the real world.
They talk about many different things they twist the facts and they try to convince you its raining when you know the truth.
Thousands more will loose their jobs, many more have already lost their jobs and do not even know it.
Lockheed Martin, will be announcing layoffs in the very near future, and even more a few days after that.
When the True Employment rate reaches 25 percent, then you will see the truth for what it is and the number of media lies and distortions will change the facts.
Be prepared, keep at least a 2week food supply on hand at all times, it not only makes sense but it will also save you money.
The idea that food and water may become disrupted is something that you need to seriously consider.
Hurricane Sandy, the shelves of stores reportedly were emptied in hours, leaving many residents without any access to shelter food and water.
Find the truth because the media is not telling you the real trust.
If you think that Hurricane Sandy is over your very wrong, millions are reported to be still without power, people are cold and hungry, it is very possible that there are bodies yet to be found, but you do not see that on the news media coverages.
Why is that, think seriously about that for a moment because if you are not being told the truth, by omission how will you ever figure out the real world, if all you see if a facade of the real truth.
Did the media just end election in this nation, Can we even Say that elections are fair?
With the way the Media have taken over the election process, were basically relegated to watching as the “smart” people predict the election results, can we really trust what they tell us even when sometimes they are wrong, they predict the result of an election before half of America has finished voting.
They often predict the results of a state election when only a small percentage of the votes have been counted.
Fox News and other media outlets have projected that President Obama has been reelected to a second term. If, in celebrating his victory Obama wanted to give credit where credit is due, he might want to think about calling some of America’s top journalists, since their favorable approach almost certainly made the difference between victory and defeat.
Reviewing the 2012 presidential campaign, here are five ways the media elite tipped the public relations scales in favor of the liberal Obama and against the conservative challenger Mitt Romney:
1. The Media’s Biased Gaffe Patrol Hammered Romney: The media unfairly jumped on inconsequential mistakes — or even invented controversies — from Romney and hyped them in to multi-day media “earthquakes.” Case in point: the GOP candidate’s trip to Europe and Israel in late July. A Media Research Center analysis of all 21 ABC, CBS and NBC evening news stories about Romney’s trip found that virtually all of them (18, or 86%) emphasized “diplomatic blunders,” “gaffes” or “missteps.”
They quickly tell you what they want you to hear, then ignore the truth from that point forward.
You think that you know the truth but the truth is they know you.
Conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer blasted the news coverage in an August 2 column, calling the trip “a major substantive success” that was wrapped “in a media narrative of surpassing triviality.”
Similarly, when the left-wing Mother Jones magazine in September put out a secretly-recorded video of Romney talking to donors about the 47% of Americans who don’t pay income taxes, the networks hyped it like a sensational sex scandal. Over three days, the broadcast network morning and evening shows churned out 42 stories on the tape, nearly 90 minutes of coverage. The tone was hyperbolic; ABC’s “Good Morning America” called it a “bombshell rocking the Mitt Romney campaign,” while ABC “World News” anchor Diane Sawyer declared it a “political earthquake.”
None of Obama’s gaffes garnered that level of coverage. After the president in a June 8 press conference declared that “the private sector is doing fine,” the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts gave it just one night’s coverage, then basically dropped the story — nothing further on ABC’s “World News” or the “CBS Evening News” in the weeks that followed, and just two passing references on the “NBC Nightly News.”
They believe that they know best, that they can provide for you better than you can, they feel like they should be able to tell you what to eat, how to think what to say and how to act, if you disagree, you will end up in jail or worse.
Untied States of Amerika
Now you might think that the media have an agenda and you would be allegedly right.
You might wonder why they are allowed to distort fact with alleged fiction, mostly opinionated fiction at that.
The thing is when you look at how ignorant the media actually are you have to wonder how they make any money at all.
The news media keeps trying to find ways to do Barack Obama’s bidding and undercut the Romney/Ryan team. First they jumped on Mitt Romney like a pack of jackals and badgered him endlessly about his comments about how it was wrong to apologize and appease radical Islamists who were storming our embassies.
Then the media pounced on the secret recording of Mitt Romney correctly noting that Democrats have now gotten close to 50% of the population hooked on government handouts, and how it’s nearly impossible to win the votes of people who don’t want to give up their handouts from the government. They want to keep the ‘redistribution of wealth’ in place.And after these relentless attacks, what did the media do? They then hyped all these polls showing that Obama was leading after they had smeared the Romney/Ryan ticket. But the irony is they still had to skew the polls by oversampling Democrats to get the result they wanted.
The media is in the tank for the Obama/Biden ticket and today they sank to a new low. Politico published a report saying that Paul Ryan was trash talking his running mate, Mitt Romney, and had begun referring to Romney behind-the-scenes as “the stench.”
A flurry of other media outlets then began circulating the report, and saying it showed how bad things were going for the Romney/Ryan ticket. The big problem: it’s entirely untrue.
So often it appears that they think that they are smarter than anyone else but the truth is far different.
Vote in November because the truth may save America.
In yet another biased (allegedly) fox news story, they had some Euro Trash on there talking about how the riots, in LA were much more destructive than the riots in London, Do those jerks at fox news really think that people are that stupid?
You just have to wonder about people like that, because there is no comparison to the two situations, yet once again the fox news bobble head said nothing at all to challenge the view that they were not being honest in comparing the two events.
When you think about it that way you have to say you know what, you cant really compare the two events because there was no similar premise of comparison.
The idea was to try to say that guns cause crime, but the idea was a failure just as the Fox news bobble heads failed when they did not challenge the stupidity of the speaker.
When you do that you do nothing to help, you do everything to make yourself look stupid.
Imagine a movie where the citizens of the United states were betrayed by politicians in office and they went around and took all the guns from every one but the one people who would not act to protect the American People…
Then once they have disarmed everyone the rest of the world could then come in and murder Americans in their beds while they sleep, sounds like a horror movie right?
Wrong…
This could be a reality if members of congress get their way and you elected many of these bozos.
Received in an email, (may not be the opinion of the administrator or the owners of this website)
I’ve been warning Second Amendment supporters about this for months.
President Obama and his anti-gun pals will do virtually ANYTHING to set the stage for passage of the U.N. “Small Arms Treaty” — including putting innocent American lives at risk.
In fact, speaking on the ATF’s recent “Gunwalker” scandal, former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton stated that President Obama’s ATF agents stood by silently while Mexican drug cartels illegally smuggled hundreds of rifles across the border to . . .
. . . provide a foundation for their argument [on] why the United States will have to enter into, in short order, the United Nations-negotiated arms trade treaty.
One of those guns was likely used in the MURDER of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry — an unfortunate “pawn” in President Obama’s GLOBAL war on our guns, as the Tuscon Citizen and other media outlets report.
That’s why it’s vital you make a contribution of $10 or even $20 to help the National Association for Gun Rights fight the U.N. gun ban.
You see, the U.N. “Small Arms Treaty” is ultimately designed to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private citizens like YOU.
So far, the gun-grabbers have successfully kept the exact wording of their new scheme under wraps.
If passed by the UN and ratified by the U.S. Senate, the U.N. “Small Arms Treaty” would almost certainly FORCE the U.S. to:
*** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding Americans cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;
*** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL “unauthorized” civilian firearms (all firearms owned by governments are excluded, of course);
*** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons including shotguns and other firearms commonly used for hunting;
*** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.
Worse, once this fight kicks off, you and I won’t have much time to react.
Can I count on you for a generous contribution of $30 TODAY?
If that’s too much, please agree to send $20 or at least $10.
Please understand just how important this fight is — and how important it is that you and I fight back NOW while we still can.
The truth is, unless you and I can succeed in FORCING Senators to pledge their opposition to the U.N. “Small Arms Treaty” now, there could be no stopping this freight train once it gets to D.C.
President Obama is willing to do virtually ANYTHING to see the U.N. “Small Arms Treaty” ratified — including putting the lives of innocent Americans at risk.
So please rush me your most generous contribution of $30, $20 or $10 TODAY.
For Freedom,
Dudley Brown
Executive Director
P.S. The recent ATF Gunwalker scandal, putting American lives at risk, has proven just how far President Obama will go to see the U.N. “Small Arms Treaty” ratified.
So please rush me your most generous contribution of $30, $20 or $10 TODAY!
Please act TODAY!
Some people are concerned that we no longer have a free media in this nation, perhaps that has been the case for along time now however, before the Internet, knowledge was limited.
Just like back in the 1950s the average reading age of an American was much lower than it is today when a much larger percentage of the population can now read, knowledge has changed and the way we learn has changed with computers, you can choose the type of knowledge that you are interested in learning.
From websites to ebooks and even portable readers, like the kindle or the ipad, which can carry movies, articles, audio books, and more, however it appears that the media has not factored this into its news coverage and so we see a lot of what must be termed, (allegedly) bias in the media because they hope to try and influence the thoughts of people who are free to do and to think as they want.
That is a serious problem, because when you try to control the freedom of a people you will not find it an easy thing to do, which explains some of the behavior that you so often see on some of the more liberal news companies.
It is frankly disturbing and it is something that should not be even allowed, but that same freedom again is what made this nation great, the media seems to have forgotten where its bread is buttered.
Who do you think supports the media?
If you said Advertisers, you are only half right, the real supporters of the media are the people, because if people stopped buying products that are advertised on media outlets then there would be no need for advertisements.
When the media attempt’s to influence the thoughts of people using keywords and phrases or even subliminal programming or using words and actions of Bobble heads, then you have a conflict of interest. Advertisers just want people to come and to buy their products, however over time the objective of some news companies has not been advertising but influence.
That is a real problem to the freedom of the press as a whole.
Think about that the next time you buy a product you have seen advertised on a network that thinks less of your than they do the agenda of thought control and influence. When you have someone whispering in your ear that the sky is purple, over time you will come to believe that the sky is in fact purple, or is that really true at all? We know that some media companies believe that this is in fact true, that if they tell enough lies, if they tell you the lie, enough times, that you will eventually come to believe it.
The thing is that discounts human will, and that is a strong thing, we know from science and from history those that “think” they know everything often end up lampooned on the petards of their own devices. It is something to consider simply because over the last four elections there have been numerous attempts by the media to influence the outcome of an election in favor of one political party, in fact we have seen that funding from the public has been used to support some media companies that tend to only present one point of view, now that is not only wrong, but it is against the spirit of the American people.
Yet, we allow it to continue, when a people are pushed too far eventually they will not accept the wants of the lessor power.
We have free will and that is something that no media company can take away.
The Media does not like the tea party, no surprise there as it has long been established that the media is not really that impartial in its reporting of the news, however it begs the question that should be something everyone is talking about, which is how can the media only present one side of a situation, and still be trusted?
Think about that for a moment, The media has been presenting only one part of the story, only one perspective, even Fox news which has become one of the more popular media outlets, is sliding over to one view, they say that they are fair and ballanced, but are they really? Bill hemmer, Bill, orielly, Shepard Smith, all tend to present Bias in their coverage, they want you to believe that they are presenting news and facts, but is that really accurate?
Bill orielly, says the spin stops here, but when he engages in favoring one side over another, when he only covers one side of an issue and talks over anyone Else’s opinion, then is that not his own “spin” I find it hard to swallow that Bill is not having some kind of mental issue, (allegedly) but I guess that is to be expected as he has a history of this in his family, and that is to be expected, however there is a thin line between reality and fantasy, and Bill sometimes I think gets lost in that thin line.
This was just received in an email and it is compelling, the Media is against the tea party, but why is that?
Dear Patriot,
Something incredible has been happening over the last few days, and it was every loyal member of the Tea Party Movement that made it happen! If you’ve been following the news, you’ve heard nearly every political commentator comment on the fact that Speaker John Boehner was forced to change his original plan twice because he couldn’t muster the 216 votes to get it passed. The general commentary goes like this: “In the past, Speaker Boehner could have given away money for a bridge or a library to buy the votes he needed, but the Tea Party banned earmarks so he doesn’t have that luxury.” Many of these old media dinosaurs speak with disdain when they make this point, as though by stripping the Congress of their currency of corruption (earmarks) is a bad thing; they just don’t get it! You should feel extremely proud of what those of us in the Tea Party have done–we have changed the entire culture inside Congress!
Now, if a politician wants to get the votes to pass legislation, he better be able to win on the merits of that legislation. It’s no longer an option to trade an unprincipled vote to fund some absurd pet project. No more “cornhusker kickbacks” for Ben Nelson in Nebraska; no more “Louisiana purchase” for Mary Landrieu in exchange for the passage of the dangerous Obamacare. This is the first example of how we are going to stop the flow of terrible legislation from Washington.
I’m so proud to have played my small role, and I’m genuinely hopeful that as we continue to grow, “We The People” will be able to preserve the blessings of liberty for our children and grandchildren! The fight over the debt ceiling continues but already we’ve secured important victories by changing the process. This organization will continue to recruit tens of thousands of new patriots each and every week, and we’ll continue to provide the latest and best tools to make all of us more effective activists. TOGETHER, WE WILL WIN!
The most incredible part is we have put all of this infrastructure together without having to sell our souls to anyone. We’re entirely funded by patriots just like you who make an average contribution of less than $60! This truly is a historic day for the direction of country and we remain humbled by your continued support.
Thank you,
Dustin Stockton
Media Director
Just received this in an email, interesting fodder for the mill however, it is really interesting that there is so a difference in diesel prices, (which have a direct impact on food prices)
$1,000 per year.
That’s how much EXTRA you are coughing up as gas prices exceed $4 a gallon.
Do you believe President Obama is to blame for these prices?
Can he do more to lower them?
Newsmax.com, one of America’s leading online news services, is conducting an urgent national poll about rising gasoline prices and President Obama’s policies.
It’s crucial to make your voice heard, and Newsmax will ensure poll results are promptly sent to all major media outlets.
Newsmax reports gain national attention with results cited by the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, CNN, ABC News, Fox News, CBS, MSNBC, Meet the Press, and other major networks.
While news max may be a good publisher the real problem in our dependence on oil as a fuel, allegedly is the auto makers, for years big oil and the auto industry, (now the unions too don’t forget that) are in charge of just about every large corporation and many levels of government from trash pickup to many other things.
This creates many issues for the modern politician.
So what do you do, this is one of the problem we have an we had better find a solution, because right now, we still have people out there driving V8 Gas Guzzlers, and they do not care, that they are both polluting and reducing the available supply of fuels.
It is a problem, but the very real facts remain, how can we depend less on fuels when we have a bureaucratic red tape machine that is fighting against itself every step of the way from permits, to inspections, and everything in between.
The truth is that what they are doing is not working.
The truth is that Diesel should be 20 percent less than gas not 30 percent more.
When you imbalance the system, in favor of the gas distribution system, you end up with trouble.
Can Sarah Palin win against the media?
I wonder about that, you know should the media have a side at all?
Think about that for a second or two, the media should not be picking and choosing a side in a political race yet that is what they are doing is it not? When you do this do you not loose all perspective about the so called “news” that you are covering?
So, again, why is the media attempting to undermine the political process in American Elections?
It appears that the liberals are going to really start in on this one, Sarah Palin, reviled only by less allegedly than 18 percent of the population, leaving the about 72 percent of the public loving her…
Not bad numbers, if you think of it that way, but you will not hear the media talk about it that way at all.
The media is sort of twisted don’t you think…
So watch out for the liberals because you know how much they just love Sarah Palin…
When you consider the alternatives, Sarah is looking much better than what the democrats have to offer, not only is she nice to look at but she can give a speech that allegedly resonates with more than 72 percent of this nations voters.
If you take the media influence out of the equation, which is a thing that should be done anyway, then you have a great candidate, however, it appears that the media “thinks” that they can control your minds with negative coverage of the presidential election, interesting that they never have considered that people tend to ignore things that are lies…
Back in the 1950s Television was so new that no one could even conceive that someone would come on TV and lie to you, but now, people are not as naive as they were back in 1950 and in fact people are far more educated than they were back then.
It is interesting to watch the media as they try to convince people that they are not smart enough to make up their own minds about the news and what is happening in the world, they think that somehow, people are just too dumb to understand the world unless they have the media to help them understand, that is really funny, perhaps its time that the media got over itself, it is just not as powerful as it once was back in the 1950s.
A great example of dumb media outlets, is the huff post, with this type of comment source huff post,
if Palin were to announce a run in the near future, it could create chaos in a GOP primary that has just begun to take shape in the last few weeks.
I find it laughable that anyone would fall for such low life dirty politics in writing, but you never know, there are those 18 percent that just seems to be well sort of “out there” you never know what they are thinking, because well they are some strange folks, they are the ones that rank high in the P scales, on Psychology tests, still you have to factor them into the mix because this is America, and while real Americans do not try to keep anyone from having an opinion, apparently the people over at the huff and puff media outlet, just cant seem to figure it all out.