Categories
Politics

Casey Anthony Death Panel

It seems as if when ever you see this news story on Fox which is practicly all the time these days, something negative is said, by the comentator, (I know they read it from a teleprompter) but why so negative, they use words to describe the defendant like agitated, stoney, steely, but is that really accurate, or are they just playing games with the minds of their viewers.

Dr. Bowden today mentioned something that I was really interested in because there are so many problems, with the evidence.

He said Bad science was allowed to push good science out of the way and that it could create some serious problems for the future.

Are we going to sit back and allow over zealous, allegedly Ambitious, people within the Government of the State of Florida to push

an agenda that may not be fair.

 

Should this even be a death case at all?

Has the State of Florida wasted the peoples time with trying to put Casey Anthony to death?

The jury may and probably come back with a guilty verdict, based allegedly on an emotional appeal by the DA,
but why is that? 

Why are they so convinced that there was a murder at all?

From what has been presented nothing tell us that this was murder, but rather an accident, badly handled, yes, but intentional, not really, I just dont buy that, the real problem here is with the judge and the state, this entire dog and poney show, is the result of poor police work, muddy water, and even worse forensic work.

Only time will tell the truth if we ever find it out, I will be suprised.

Categories
Politics

Casey Anthony not guilty

Did the State of Florida over step its bounds?

Why did the State of Florida choose to try to prove Murder when they could have proved, other things that would have kept her behind bars for a long time, why did they not see what was so obvious to everyone else?

They wanted to take the life of this defendant, but they did not have the evidence simply because there was no evidence, which is something to consider when you think about it, either this girl was some matermind, or she was a drug addled, party girl, which one is it?

Spurred on by the media and their allegedly spittle frothing at the mouth bobble headed idiots, the public has been inundated, with negative coverage of this trial, call it bias, call it just being nasty, but not matter what you say, this case has not been reported correctly or allegedly fairly.

This was a waste of the Tax payers money and the District Attorney should be fired.

Why did the State of Florida do this and why did they waste so much money?

 

Capitol Murder  

Not Guilty

Aggravated Manslaughter, 

Not Guilty.

Aggravated Child abuse

Not Guilty.

Lying to police

Guilty.

Categories
Politics

fox news bias

Fox news, Judge Jury Executioner,

 

Update did fox news, influence the trial by allegedly using negative descriptors and multiple "one way only" opinionated, bobble heads.  What could happen if Fox news continues its allegedly slanted coverage and harm comes to Casey Anthony as a direct result of Fox news allowing its bobble heads to continue to rip on this woman even though she was not convicted by a jury of her peers.

Even the somewhat less than fair and ballanced, Bill orielly openly stated that he was angry.

What would happen if someone with an unballanced mind, were to go out and take action based on Bill orielly and his statements of how Angry he is about the verdict, is that right?

Is that how Fair and Ballanced news coverage is created these days or is that a mistake by Bill?

We want to know because if in the great mind of Bill his opinion is the only one that matters why not just incite violence?

The reason why you dont do those things is that no one can be certain of the circumstances, and that may even as horrible as it might sound that might also include casey, what happened, may have been a very terrible accident, that was not handled, correctly, we may never know, but you know what is worse, that is when the so called fair and ballanced news coverage is allegedly anything but fair and ballanced.

 

More fox news Bias

today there was a lot of alleged bias that was presented by several bobble heads, including Phil Keating, and others, who shot off their mouths without the benefit of the intelligence that most people should have before making broad statements, in fact fox news producers played a question and answer session, between the judge and the defendant, that is normal in all such cases, yet, fox news producers failed to make that distinction when they played that tape.

Some viewers may have been misled by such playing of video without the benefit of explanation, this is not right and is biased in fact it might even open up Fox news to lawsuits should someone choose to do so, since opinion and misrepresentation, is not the same thing.

Is fox news real news or are they fake news with producers that may allegedly be intentionally misleading consumers of news?

 

Looking at the production process how hard is it to present two sides, after all as they say, "there are two sides to every story"

And somewhere between the two different sides of this story is likely the truth, knowing this and knowing the human condition how can any media company not present both sides of a case.

 

is there really any such thing as fair and balanced, news?

This is an interesting video but does not NBC and ABC and CBS and MSNBC do they not also represent a point of view?

When you consider it that way does not every news company represented a point of view as well?

Is any news company a real news company?

 

Categories
Politics

Casey Anthony lies?

This entire trial is like a three ring circus, with the media daily speculating about all the crazy things you might see in a situation like this and peopel foaming at the mouth that do not know as much as the defense in this case knows about the trial, you have to wonder about the talking heads in the media, what makes them think that they are smart enought to figure any thing out?

So has this judge allowed a proper trial or should he be investigated for alleged ethics violations?

 

This is getting just crazy, when you listen to the talking heads at Fox news, like Shepard Smith, you hear this guy talking trash at every turn. So, can this girl get a fair trial with a judge that allegedly is biased and should be allegedly recused from this case. unqualified to perform legal duties because of a possible conflict of interest or lack of impartiality

Should the judge be dismissed?

Should fox news talking heads be so opinionated, after all they are talking about life and death here. When you see the news coverage that is laced with biased information, you have to wonder how anyone could have a fair trial in these circumstances. When you see Fox new Headlines like,

(is the Casey Anthony Defense Falling apart?)

You have to ask how is it possible for a defendant to get a fair trial when you have the entire media against you. You see biased statement after biased statement, yet, no real evidence most of this stuff is so flimsy you could read a newspaper through it. How would you like to have to try to defend yourself under these circumstances. The truth here is that the media is biased and the judge could also be biased.