Categories
Politics

Sequester Insanity…

Amazing the story you are about to read is just that…

You might be wondering about how the Sequester budget battle is effecting the lives of those people who need help in America.

The truth may be something that you find difficult to understand and comprehend.

Read the rest of the story here.

I know you might be wondering about this situation because you hear the biased media talk about how bad it is and the lovely girl on Capitol hill, (whats her name?) Oh well, we forget, but she said that her staff was suffering because they were not able to get a good meal.

But what about those people who live under a bridge in your own city senator?

Wow, read this because its something that you may not realize is happening in Washington…

 

Categories
Politics

The Cant Win List

Can anyone win against the media?

Update, It is becoming very clear that Mitt Romney is not able to become president…

In fact if you listen to the media and you actually believe all the trash they shovel on a daily basis, no one can win…

  Yes the media continue to give lavish coverage of this man, when it is becoming more obvious than ever….

The media apparently still has not learned that people are not as ignorant as in the past. While it is obvious that there is a small percentage of people that believe everything they are told, that percentage is shrinking and the media have not figured that out yet. This will make you laugh, so be prepared to grin at how the media view you. The Media tries to use reverse psychology on you, by pushing certain candidates that cannot win (and they know it) So who is on this list, well the top person who should allegedly be on this Cant win list is.

1. newt gingrich 
2.  ron paul 
3.  rudy giuliani 
4.  mike huckabee 
5.  Mitt Romney 
6. Tim Pawlenty
7. Jon Huntsman,
Former U.S. Ambassador to China

Jon may talk a good political game, but sadly, he cannot win, just look at the mess we are in with China right now?

Do you want that kind of mess for every nation on the face of the planet, then vote for Jon,
if you want real hope and change, then vote for anyone else.

The Media tries to use double reverse Psychology, by pretending to push certain candidates while hoping those candidates will not run. The Media seems to be involved in a lot of what is called politics, they are like the troll living under the bridge waiting for an unsuspecting pilgrim to wander across the bridge. I know its sort of odd to see this type of thing, because in the past the Media has tried to create this idea that they are your friends, and in the past perhaps that was true, with the baby boomer generation and the days when TV went off after 10 PM at night, those days are gone forever, but it is really ignorant to consider that along with all those changes that the audience, the consumers, the customers, the clients have not changed?

The thing is we have changed simply because we no longer are entirely dependent upon the media for our news. We can get multiple news sources from multiple places, all over the world, we are no longer limited to the 5PM news story and that my friends is a very good thing when you begin to look at the way that the media has tried to influence not only the outcome of elections but also public opinions by using psychology and keywords they try to intimidate the public into believing what they think we should believe, it was a powerful plan of action back in the 1970s but today, thirty year in the past, that idea is just not working any more. No longer are we subject to simply tricks of psychology, we have evolved beyond that type of intimidation so the media is slowing trying to figure out how they can change their stripes, but can they really do what they think they can do, influence the outcome of elections and more importantly should they be doing that at all. The problem is that people are just not that stupid if we ever were and what is even more interesting is the very real fact that with out consumers, no advertisers would ever pay a fee to advertise on a broken media outlet, so really who is smarter now?

Categories
Politics

moving to the middle

Some say that the current president may be incapable of moving to the middle like president Bill Clinton did which resulted in a growth in the economy and a budget surplus, so what does that mean, if you had a man that was poised on a bridge and he said I have two choices, I can come down from here and make a deliberate, attempt to act in the best interest of the American people, or I can just lay my ears back like the donkey that I am and jump off the bridge because my plans did not work the way I hoped they would, (I thought I was doing the right thing) but I was wrong, the difference between the two ideas here is simple.

One man, is interested in the people the other is only interested in his own personal agenda.

Some might call this attitude selfish and well just downright wrong…

Why are we not doing the right thing for the people?

 

 

Categories
Politics

Hope and Change?

Just wondering is this the hope and the change that you voted for in 2008?

It sort of seems lacking to me, I mean, what we heard, and what we god were two very different things.

Change is something that we all want, which is why so many people voted for that hope and that change, however, we were betrayed, simple as that, we were told one thing then given something else entirely, they used to call that bait and switch.

A cheap parlor trick, some might say, (allegedly)

Just received this in an Email, (may not necessarily represent the opinions of the owners of this website)

Dear Patriot,

Something incredible has been happening over the last few days, and it was every loyal member of the Tea Party Movement that made it happen! If you’ve been following the news, you’ve heard nearly every political commentator comment on the fact that Speaker John Boehner was forced to change his original plan twice because he couldn’t muster the 216 votes to get it passed. The general commentary goes like this: “In the past, Speaker Boehner could have given away money for a bridge or a library to buy the votes he needed, but the Tea Party banned earmarks so he doesn’t have that luxury.” Many of these old media dinosaurs speak with disdain when they make this point, as though by stripping the Congress of their currency of corruption (earmarks) is a bad thing; they just don’t get it! You should feel extremely proud of what those of us in the Tea Party have done–we have changed the entire culture inside Congress!

Now, if a politician wants to get the votes to pass legislation, he better be able to win on the merits of that legislation. It’s no longer an option to trade an unprincipled vote to fund some absurd pet project. No more “cornhusker kickbacks” for Ben Nelson in Nebraska; no more “Louisiana purchase” for Mary Landrieu in exchange for the passage of the dangerous Obamacare. This is the first example of how we are going to stop the flow of terrible legislation from Washington.

I’m so proud to have played my small role, and I’m genuinely hopeful that as we continue to grow, “We The People” will be able to preserve the blessings of liberty for our children and grandchildren! The fight over the debt ceiling continues but already we’ve secured important victories by changing the process. This organization will continue to recruit tens of thousands of new patriots each and every week, and we’ll continue to provide the latest and best tools to make all of us more effective activists. TOGETHER, WE WILL WIN!

The most incredible part is we have put all of this infrastructure together without having to sell our souls to anyone. We’re entirely funded by patriots just like you who make an average contribution of less than $60! This truly is a historic day for the direction of country and we remain humbled by your continued support.
 
Thank you,
Dustin Stockton
Media Director

Categories
bill hemmer bill oreilly bill orielly cnn democratic liars democrats in congress democrats out democrats tax lies dictator dictotor distust drain the swamp fox and friends fox news fox news biased news government shut down gridlock harry reid resign harry reid to blame harry reid unconstitutional

Media Bias

The Media does not like the tea party, no surprise there as it has long been established that the media is not really that impartial in its reporting of the news, however it begs the question that should be something everyone is talking about, which is how can the media only present one side of a situation, and still be trusted?

Think about that for a moment, The media has been presenting only one part of the story, only one perspective, even Fox news which has become one of the more popular media outlets, is sliding over to one view, they say that they are fair and ballanced, but are they really?  Bill hemmer, Bill, orielly, Shepard Smith,  all tend to present Bias in their coverage, they want you to believe that they are presenting news and facts, but is that really accurate?

Bill orielly, says the spin stops here, but when he engages in favoring one side over another, when he only covers one side of an issue and talks over anyone Else’s opinion, then is that not his own “spin” I find it hard to swallow that Bill is not having some kind of mental issue, (allegedly) but I guess that is to be expected as he has a history of this in his family, and that is to be expected, however there is a thin line between reality and fantasy, and Bill sometimes I think gets lost in that thin line.

This was just received in an email and it is compelling, the Media is against the tea party, but why is that?

Dear Patriot,

Something incredible has been happening over the last few days, and it was every loyal member of the Tea Party Movement that made it happen! If you’ve been following the news, you’ve heard nearly every political commentator comment on the fact that Speaker John Boehner was forced to change his original plan twice because he couldn’t muster the 216 votes to get it passed. The general commentary goes like this: “In the past, Speaker Boehner could have given away money for a bridge or a library to buy the votes he needed, but the Tea Party banned earmarks so he doesn’t have that luxury.” Many of these old media dinosaurs speak with disdain when they make this point, as though by stripping the Congress of their currency of corruption (earmarks) is a bad thing; they just don’t get it! You should feel extremely proud of what those of us in the Tea Party have done–we have changed the entire culture inside Congress!

Now, if a politician wants to get the votes to pass legislation, he better be able to win on the merits of that legislation. It’s no longer an option to trade an unprincipled vote to fund some absurd pet project. No more “cornhusker kickbacks” for Ben Nelson in Nebraska; no more “Louisiana purchase” for Mary Landrieu in exchange for the passage of the dangerous Obamacare. This is the first example of how we are going to stop the flow of terrible legislation from Washington.

I’m so proud to have played my small role, and I’m genuinely hopeful that as we continue to grow, “We The People” will be able to preserve the blessings of liberty for our children and grandchildren! The fight over the debt ceiling continues but already we’ve secured important victories by changing the process. This organization will continue to recruit tens of thousands of new patriots each and every week, and we’ll continue to provide the latest and best tools to make all of us more effective activists. TOGETHER, WE WILL WIN!

The most incredible part is we have put all of this infrastructure together without having to sell our souls to anyone. We’re entirely funded by patriots just like you who make an average contribution of less than $60! This truly is a historic day for the direction of country and we remain humbled by your continued support.
 
Thank you,
Dustin Stockton
Media Director

Categories
Politics

From Bad to worse…

When good men make bad mistakes, did blowing up levies protecting farm land cause more damage than allowing nature to take its course?

The flooding in the central US could have been allegedly made worse by the US Army Core of Engineers that allegedly attempted to save large cities by flooding farm lands, but could this have caused more damage than allowing nature to take its course?

My mother remembers the great floods of the 1930s when she walked across rail road tracks across high bridges, and the water was lapping just below her feed and the cross ties that spanned the bridge, it was a frightful memory for her however what many farmers of today are facing could be much worse because during the great floods of the 30s at least we still had people in Washington that were at least half way intelligent.

When you look at what is being done now you just have to scratch your head and wonder do these people even know what they are doing?