Categories
Politics

biased CNN debate tonight

Well time for CNN to have yet allegedly another biased news media event
where  they may be likely to ask questions that are unfair and biased in
nature.

You just have to wonder in part why put up with a news company that
is not really a news company at all?

You have to wonder when you see these questions from these liberals.

They ask questions based on emotion, not fact, they ask questions that
they do not want to answer if the shoe were on the other foot they would
say that it was racist to ask questions like that.

They will say all kinds of things that make no sense at all.

They have an agenda, to try to make the debaters look bad and to attack each other.
They try to phrase a question where there is only one outcome to that question, the
answer they want to hear, and that may not be the truth at all.

It is a problem when the news is no longer the news.

In some ways there has been a call for some of these so called news companies that are
so far left or right for that matter that they should not be afforded the right to broadcast.

That is a little extreme, however if you have a news company that distorts the truth and
you have a news company that attempts to taint the news in its own image then that is
a real issue that perhaps we should discuss.

Cnn tonight will be doing the moderation, now to make it fair they should have at
least one moderator for each viewpoint, but that is not the way that they usually operate.
most of the time they are sneaky, (allegedly)

Most of the time they try to carefully word their questions where they can come up
with the now famous or infamous analogy of the “Gotcha” Question.

This does no one any good and it is also not news worthy.

In the old days this would have been considered unprofessional and it would have been
considered stupid. 

These days we have to put up with CNN or Do we?

Do we really have to put up with the biased and ugly (allegedly) coverage that CNN often
attempts to use words that are weighted to try and to create a certain impression when
one does not really exist.

They often say things that are not true, and then they try to hide that fact by using
confusing narratives, that can be misunderstood or even intentionally vague so that
they can then follow up with another “gotcha” question, while this might be entertainment for some of these liberals in the News media it is insulting to most clear thinking Americans.

So while some may think that watching a biased news company attempting to pursue
its own agenda at the expense of the public entertainment, we dont see it that way.

 

 

Categories
Politics

Media Bias the Third man in the ring?

Should the media be banned from influencing the outcomes of elections?

Should they be actively seeking to develop methods of influence and then charging large multi-national corporations, (which pay no taxes) to peddle that influence on a broadcast? 

Opinion for sale to the highest bidder?   Is that news, Really?

Is the media now a participant in the political process and if so is it fair for the media to take sides in this process which is and has ever been that of the people by the people for the people. If you were to go to a boxing match and the announcer suddenly started punching one opponent, the first thing that you would think would be “What the Heck is going on” this is a boxing contest between two opponents not two against one, but that is really what is going on when you look at what the media did in 2008 and has continued to do for the last three years.

Yet, apparently most of America has either not noticed or they are blind to what the media has been doing.

Are they really that slick that they can operate behind smoke filled rooms carefully planning on who will be the next president of the United States, and if that is going on, how is that a fair contest?

The press and the media used to report the news, now they are becoming the news story.

Will the people allow the media to attempt to influence and control the voting process through allegedly unfair coverage of the political process.

In the boxing analogy above, it would be insane to consider two against one a fair contest yet, that is really what the media is doing pretending to cover the news but really inventing the news according to their own ideas of what they “think the news should be.

When you consider the entire story then you have to acknowledge that the media has been actively participating in the political election process for some time now, but until the internet no one knew what they were up to or few people knew it because the media cannot actively report on their own behaviors can they?