Categories
Politics

Democracy, Republic, or Dictator?

The choice is yours, when you think about it this year we have a choice to return to the principals that have served us well for more than 200 years or to move forward to embrace the failed policies of Europe which if you will remember we had to come over and save…

At a huge cost in American lives, Money, Resources, Manpower, we sacrificed much to keep the freedom we now enjoy.

I find it ironic that we now face the same choice as in the past.

We face a choice between what has been a proven failure not in one country but in Seven…

World wide this issue has been tried and they have failed.

So now we have a choice to make do we foolishly think that we can do what has never worked before?

Or do we return to what we know works for our nation, America is at issue here are we going to sit on the couch and watch trash on network TV designed to reduce our values to nothing or will we get off the couch and vote.

This story is just insane yet this is what you have elected or is it?

In the past few weeks a few choice Democratic, entities, (which likely speak for them selves first and the party second) came out and seemed to be suggesting that we need less democracy, and more (what) Government?  or were they suggesting something entirely different. 

They seemed to be suggesting that if it were not for all the distractions of having to run for congress, and having to run for governor, that they might be able to focus on doing their jobs?  Really?  Amazing, so these “people” are saying that they cannot do their jobs?

Allegedly

North Carolina Gov. Beverly Perdue after she suggested Congress suspend elections for two years

You know if you cant do your job, perhaps its time to get out of politics, because I assure you there are 20 people waiting in
line to get your job.

What really seems to be a big issue here is that these so called democratic entities, were suggesting that we just suspend the election.

But what were they really talking about suspending…

The constitution which requires that congress, hold elections, so let me get this straight, a democratic governor, wants to suspend the constitution, in favor of a dictator government, really?  Now that should tell you a lot about some democrats because some of this crew would have you in cages, like animals at the zoo, that is how they work, look at dictator governments across the world and notice how much of the population are in jail or prison? 

some perhaps up to 40 percent…

Does that bother you that we might have some democratic leaders that want to do away with the one thing that makes us different from other nations, the constitution which by the way has worked very well for more than 200 years, yet, we have some that now want to scrap the constitution in favor of what, their own twisted, convoluted, vile, warped, swamp of politics and a horror movie of epic proportions.

You have to ask yourself do you really want people like that in charge?

If you do, all you have to do is to move to a country that is controlled by a dictator and see how “free” you feel once you get there, because that is the kind of freedom that these people are supporting.

Hope and change, no not even close, it is more like no change and hopelessness.

If you are sick and tired of evil politicians that have this crazy insane agenda to enslave all of America, then you need to make sure that you are registered to vote in this next election because it is time to vote them people out of office, starting with the governor that dared suggest that we do away with the constitution…

 

Categories
Politics

FTC fairness doctrine for the internet?

Over the past three years, we have seen the constitution trampled on by every liberal in DC yet the media barely covers these miscreants, in their ivory towers. When will the media begin to report on these issues that effect all of the world…

Are we looking at yet another attempt to censor the free speech of the internet?

Is this yet another fairness doctrine attempt, this time in the name of protecting consumers online?

When we have blatantly deceptive commercial advertising on network TV Cable and Radio, that are deceptive yet are not enforced, what should the consuming public think of this?

What will happen in the future?

So what is the Fairness doctrine?

source wikipedia.

The Fairness Doctrine was a policy of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, that required the holders of broadcast licenses to both present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was, in the Commission’s view, honest, equitable and balanced. The 1949 Commission Report served as the foundation for the Fairness Doctrine since it had previously established two more forms of regulation onto broadcasters. These two duties were to provide adequate coverage to public issues and that coverage must be fair in reflecting opposing views.[1] The Fairness Doctrine should not be confused with the Equal Time rule. The Fairness Doctrine deals with discussion of controversial issues, while the Equal Time rule deals only with political candidates. The Fairness Doctrine imposed two rules for broadcasters: First it required broadcasters to provide controversial news and public affairs, and it required broadcasters to provide reasonable opportunities for the presentation of contrasting view points. The second rule required contingent access obligations on broadcasters to provide reply time to issue oriented citizens and editorialized on public issues. Broadcasters could trigger fairness Doctrine complaints without editorializing. Spectrum scarcity was the doctrines reason for being made. Because more people wanted to broadcast than available frequencies could accommodate, broadcasters’ public trustee obligations required regulatory clarification, the FCC reasoned. The commission required neither of the Fairness Doctrine’s obligations before 1949. Until then broadcasters had to satisfy only general “public interest” standards of the Communications Act.[2]

 

When will we learn as a people as a race of people that there are things in this world that are not fair.

That life is not fair, that sometimes, the lives of soldiers are required to insure the freedom of people.

Sometimes we see the things in this world and we want to do something to make it fair, but the fact is there is no fairness to life, there is not a guarantee, that people will be treated the same way the same time every time.

When a man tried to equalize the world what happens is that eventually the scale balance’s itself.

The fairness doctrine was a failure, back in 1949 and it was a failure in the 60s when they tried it, and it was a failure in the 1970s when they once again tried, it.

The fact is that the fairness doctrine will not work and it will not work for this case either.

The only way to be fair is to require it of everyone, if you require disclosure of one group you must require it of all groups.

 

It is time for politicians to tend to their own business and let us deal with ours.