This is a story that you may think is fiction, it may sound like the latest in popular fiction, in fact there are some online that are presenting theories about the evil events in Boston that occurred for the first time in 12 years.
There are some that are saying that there were police there before the explosion and that they were actively looking for suspects (before) the attack) There are those that say that homeless were used as a mule to transport bags that could have contained these devices.
The truth is we do not know much and also on top of that insult, there is a report that there is a concentrated effort to create a person of interest where none really exists then later arrest that person of interest and solve the case.
This sounds insane…
It sounds like it could be the latest spy plot in a best selling book…
What if its true….
What if to insulate a political party from insult and responsibility the ultimate spin job is under way to frame a suspect that fits into what they want you to believe may have happened.
Again this sounds like a book written to be produced on a kindle product.
We truly do not know what is going on but the silence is disturbing…
What ever the truth is, the color of the persons skin is not what we need to be concerned about.
Yet the media would have us thinking about skin color, is that not racist and inflammatory.
Devastation after an explosion, that some have reported smelling gas prior to the explosion, now there was a huge am0unt of damage.
No one knows for sure yet, and it may never be known for sure but if this was preventable and that is something that is subjective at best and at worst determinative.
So as the law suits begin to fly it will be months before anyone knows the real cause of this terrible event.
Troubles with the economy, at fault?
With all the troubles in California concerning the cost of running the state it may be a trickle down effect to the utilities, is this a an alleged case of monkey see monkey do? That also remains unclear however it is very concerning, when you start to hear about cities that are turning off street lights and then allegedly you start to see the crime rates rise and rise.
This really does not make any sense, because if you add up the increased cost of the added alleged, crime the cost of the street lamps was just a drop in the bucket.
So why are these people making such poor decisions, because you have to ask questions like this as it is just not smart to cut the street lamps when you really need it for the security of the people.
Finally, was it this type of attitude that may have allegedly led up to the disaster in san bruno CA?