Categories
Politics

Merry Christmas

This is the time of year when you can listen to the old songs and still be hip. 

Christmas time is the best time of the year, a time when you can watch Miracle on 34th street. 

Children can watch Frosty the snowman, all the classics and all the great tasting food. 

 

More than anything else it is about the birth of a savior a man who laid down his life for you. 

This year, as in the past there has been an ongoing attack on Christmas, from the decorated trees to 
any belief that does not agree with what they think you should believe in. 

It is no longer popular or even permitted in many places to say Merry Christmas, yet they can say anything they want to say and its ok. 

They can have all manner of monsters, ghouls and goblins, and its ok, but the moment you have an original thought they will pounce upon you and attempt to do everything they can do to take away your freedom of speech, your freedom of choice and your freedom to do what ever you want to do. 

They expect to have the freedom to do what they want to do but they will not be tolerant of anything you want to do. 

They expect for you to be tolerant of the way they behave but they will not tolerate you at all. 

This is not only stupid but evil and where  ever and when ever you see it, refuse to do business with that company. 

If it is a bank take your money out of it, If it is a retail store, refuse to buy anything from them, that is your choice and they cannot take it away from you. 

Most of all Merry Christmas because they cannot take away your voice though they might try.

In a nation of freedom its time to put christ where he belongs in this season make it a merry Christmas.
In a nation of freedom its time to put christ where he belongs in this season make it a merry Christmas.

 

 

Categories
Politics

Constitutional

Imagine if this story were true, now that could be a serious problem…

What can we do to insure the freedom of our children?

Vote them out of office…

If it is not true this might be an amazing method of gaining, new members, one thing seem interesting here is that it seems like we have some serious problems here.

This email was received today, its contents may or may not be accurate, it may not reflect the opinions of the owners of this website.

I’m in a bind. It’s illegal for me to tell you which candidates the National Association for Gun Rights PAC supports. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Federal Election Commission (FEC) expressly forbid me from telling you which candidates are so solid on gun rights that I want you to help us help them. It sounds crazy, I know. But the anti-gun Obamacrats who run the federal government don’t want gun owners and activists like you and me to be organized going into the 2012 election. That’s why the IRS/FEC will only let me tell “a restricted class” of “legal members” of the National Association for Gun Rights who they should — and shouldn’t — support in the election. The good news is, I’ve found a loophole around their legal gag, and frankly it’s pretty easy. All you need to do is chip in at least $5 (or more), and take a positive pro-gun action, and you can then be counted as part of our “legal membership.” So I’ve set up a page for you to do just that when you click here. It’s that easy. Once you’re considered what the bureaucrats call a “legal member of the Organization’s restricted class” I can tell you which candidates to support, and which anti-gunners to oppose. Are you upset with our government’s attempts to take away your rights? Are you angry at the way politicians are trashing our God-given liberties and the Constitution? Do you get tired of hearing the election season lies politicians tell about their supposed “support” of your Constitutional right to keep and bear arms? And it is very important you act today because election season is the best time to hold politicians accountable. Nothing is more important to a politician than getting elected or re-elected. That’s why the politicians and their bureaucratic allies put up as many road blocks as possible to make it hard for individuals and groups of like-minded gun activists to influence elections. Due to the onerous, free speech-violating elections laws, the National Association for Gun Rights and our members are severely limited in what we can and can’t do during the election season. I formed a Political Action Committee (PAC) for the National Association for Gun Rights to do exactly what needs to be done to hold politicians accountable without worrying about getting hauled into an IRS audit or a federal courtroom. Through the National Association for Gun Rights PAC, we can now expressly advocate for the election — or defeat — of politicians across the country. That’s why I’m asking you to do me a personal favor — and a favor for the cause we share by taking the simple step of clicking HERE and taking the simple actions. I know I don’t have to tell you that the coming election is pivotal for our gun rights. The Obama administration is desperate to pay off the anti-gunners, and I need to be able to mobilize as many gun owners as possible in the coming election. That’s why I started the National Association for Gun Rights PAC in the first place, so gun owners like you and me can have a direct impact on the elections that are so vital to our gun rights. With the specter of the United Nations’ “Small Arms Treaty” gun ban looming on the horizon, and President Obama’s pledge to pursue gun control “under the radar,” now is NOT the time for gun owners to sit on the sidelines. I need gun owners and activists just like you to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with me against the anti-gunners in both parties. To do that, I need to be able to communicate directly with you through our Political Action Committee. I can’t do that unless you’re a “legal member of the restricted class” of National Association for Gun Rights membership. The National Association for Gun Rights PAC is already involved in important Federal races, but I simply can’t tell you which ones. I can’t risk the legal battle that would surely follow. The good news is, I’ve found an easy loophole that will keep you connected with the National Association for Gun Rights PAC, and keep you on the frontlines of the most important battles in the coming election. All you need to do is chip in at least $5, right now, so you can be counted as part of our “legal membership.” It’s that easy. Once you’re considered a “legal member of the Organization’s restricted class” I can tell you which candidates to support, and which anti-gunners to oppose. It will only take a few moments. I hope I can count on you to become a “legal member of the Organization’s restricted class” so I can speak directly to you about which candidates gun owners should support, and which ones we need to fight. For Freedom, Dudley Brown Executive Director P.S. The IRS/FEC expressly forbids me to tell you which candidates have my endorsement. That’s why the IRS/FEC will only let me tell “a restricted class” of “legal members” of the National Association for Gun Rights who they should — and shouldn’t — support in the election. The good news is, I’ve found a loophole around their legal gag, and frankly it’s pretty easy. All you need to do is chip in at least $5, right now, so you can be counted as part of our “legal membership.” It’s that easy. Once you’re considered a “legal member of the Organization’s restricted class” I can tell you which candidates to support, and which anti-gunners to oppose.

Categories
Politics

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announces cancellation of fence project along border at a time when Violence in the southern border states has reached a higher rate, with violence on both sides of the border, is this the best time to cancel plans to secure the border?

It is really the time to be canceling border safety projects?

Many people have to wonder, if she is really the right person for this very serious position of responsibility, with what allegedly could be considered mistake after mistake, the people of this nation are not allegedly safer now than before.

So here is the thing, if you have someone in charge of keeping people safe, and then you see this Arizona thing happen, you have to question just how safe are people in the US, when you honestly answer that question and you look at the record of this agency you have to come to one conclusion, allegedly, we need a new person who has more experience in security matters.

We need someone that has a long and valued history of providing a secure environment.

As difficult as that may be to believe it is none the less the truth and we need to asses that consideration in the very near future.

The border is not secure and we are not secure, even though there were signs that the alleged shooter in the Arizona crisis was mentally ill, no one took action, not the Sheriff, not the deputies, not even the boys parents or teachers, no one did anything to stop this, add to that the very real problem of no security on site at this time and you have the disaster that took the lives of so many fine people, it was not a political problem it was a security problem.

The Pima county Sheriff allegedly failed the people and allegedly all other agencies also failed in their duty to keep personal safe.

It is a sad truth that we need security at public events involving public attendance, it was a hard lesson to learn but we must find that lesson in the future or else we will face this terrible tragedy again.

While some irresponsible people attempt to blame politics for this problem the real issue is security it should have been provided or contracted.