Categories
Politics

NBC Town hall She-bate

The Town hall question and answer session, which was allegedly mishandled, in a number of ways, brings about a serious problem in the question of what a debate actually is and why do we have situations where moderators support one candidate over another.

That is a serious problem of bias it is not a question at all it is a problem.

The real question is will advertisers continue to support bias in the media…

 (source)

If Tuesday night’s presidential debate proved nothing else, it demonstrated one thing: CNN’s Candy Crowley is definitely not an “uncommitted voter.” The moderator’s handling of the town-hall debate at Hofstra University was heavy-handed and one-sided throughout, not merely giving more time to President Obama, but repeatedly cutting off Mitt Romney when the Republican attempted to counter accusations from the president.

Reports surfaced days before the Townhall style so called debate that the moderator might detour from the path that both sides felt was less of a role, but many people now wonder what was going on, a moderator is neutral by nature not partisan by design.

What this suggests is media malfeasance.

When you look at the situation and the questions that were asked it is obvious that there were moments when the voters that were represented were not really undecided at all.

What was truly unfair to just about anyone that really matters is the Advertisers.

They supported this travesty of an insult to the intelligence of Americans all over the world.

They may have paid fees and then to have the entire process destroyed by this shrill of a woman, (allegedly)

 Amazing stuff here folks, but will it work are Americans really as stupid as the media appears to be, (allegedly, but what really is interesting here is how this even was so one sided. 

Source, The American Spectator.

At one point, after Obama had repeated his campaign accusation that Romney “said we should let Detroit go bankrupt,” Romney devoted part of his next reponse to rebutting the mischaracterization: “My plan was to have [auto companies] go through bankruptcy like 7-Eleven did and Macy’s and Continental Airlines and come out stronger. And I know he keeps saying, you want to take Detroit bankrupt. Well, the president took Detroit bankrupt. You took General Motors bankrupt. You took Chrysler bankrupt. So when you say that I wanted to take the auto industry bankrupt, you actually did.” The process of bankruptcy was necessary, Romney said, “to get those companies back on their feet, so they could start hiring more people. That was precisely what I recommended and ultimately what happened.”

Categories
Politics

fox news bias

Fox news, Judge Jury Executioner,

 

Update did fox news, influence the trial by allegedly using negative descriptors and multiple "one way only" opinionated, bobble heads.  What could happen if Fox news continues its allegedly slanted coverage and harm comes to Casey Anthony as a direct result of Fox news allowing its bobble heads to continue to rip on this woman even though she was not convicted by a jury of her peers.

Even the somewhat less than fair and ballanced, Bill orielly openly stated that he was angry.

What would happen if someone with an unballanced mind, were to go out and take action based on Bill orielly and his statements of how Angry he is about the verdict, is that right?

Is that how Fair and Ballanced news coverage is created these days or is that a mistake by Bill?

We want to know because if in the great mind of Bill his opinion is the only one that matters why not just incite violence?

The reason why you dont do those things is that no one can be certain of the circumstances, and that may even as horrible as it might sound that might also include casey, what happened, may have been a very terrible accident, that was not handled, correctly, we may never know, but you know what is worse, that is when the so called fair and ballanced news coverage is allegedly anything but fair and ballanced.

 

More fox news Bias

today there was a lot of alleged bias that was presented by several bobble heads, including Phil Keating, and others, who shot off their mouths without the benefit of the intelligence that most people should have before making broad statements, in fact fox news producers played a question and answer session, between the judge and the defendant, that is normal in all such cases, yet, fox news producers failed to make that distinction when they played that tape.

Some viewers may have been misled by such playing of video without the benefit of explanation, this is not right and is biased in fact it might even open up Fox news to lawsuits should someone choose to do so, since opinion and misrepresentation, is not the same thing.

Is fox news real news or are they fake news with producers that may allegedly be intentionally misleading consumers of news?

 

Looking at the production process how hard is it to present two sides, after all as they say, "there are two sides to every story"

And somewhere between the two different sides of this story is likely the truth, knowing this and knowing the human condition how can any media company not present both sides of a case.

 

is there really any such thing as fair and balanced, news?

This is an interesting video but does not NBC and ABC and CBS and MSNBC do they not also represent a point of view?

When you consider it that way does not every news company represented a point of view as well?

Is any news company a real news company?