Why the Internet is better than network news

Spread the love

Just a few years ago the Lame Stream Media used to make fun of the inter­net talk­ing about how the only way to get Hard news was to depend on the net­works to pro­vide cov­er­age, but that has changed, most­ly because most of the media to day are not real­ly pro­vid­ing good sound news cov­er­age.

The way of the past from the first days of Tele­vi­sion Broad­cast­ing adver­tis­ers saw the medi­um as a way to reach into the homes of con­sumers, what start­ed out as a few hun­dred view­ers has grown in to a world wide audi­ence.

The aver­age edu­ca­tion of Amer­i­can audi­ences from 1950 to 1990 was much less than it is today, not only are peo­ple smarter but they are through the use of the inter­net able to learn faster and with more accu­ra­cy than in the past.

What this means is that the things that used to be accept­ed as fact when pre­sent­ed by the broad­cast media are no longer a trust­ed source of infor­ma­tion.

Stat­ed plain­ly peo­ple no longer believe the lies that the media con­stant­ly attempt to influ­ence human behav­ior.

 

The media have become a pup­pet of polit­i­cal agen­da rather than what it once was in the past.

The sim­ple truth is that you can learn far more accu­rate fac­tu­al report­ing online than you can from any of the net­works includ­ing the (self pro­claimed) Fox news net­work which made a name back in the 2000 elec­tion cycle attempt­ing to present a dis­par­i­ty of fair and bal­anced cov­er­age for­mat.

This was a wel­comed change how­ev­er over the last two years that fair and bal­anced for­mat has erod­ed into a less than hon­est cov­er­age of the news.

 

Spin has been the denominate form of influence. 

 

When you con­sid­er the lev­el of spin in many of these for­mats, the most com­mon reac­tion to this kind of psy­cho­log­i­cal influ­ence is neg­a­tive.

People just turn the TV OFF.

In the near future the inter­net will replace broad­cast media.

This will hap­pen because for the most part the media have ceased to be a report­ing enti­ty.

Sim­ply put they lie and they spin and they present facts out of con­text.

The truth is peo­ple do not like to be lied to and that is what dri­ves this mar­ket.

 

Until the media real­ize that they are not the smartest peo­ple on this plan­et they will con­tin­ue to turn view­ers off by pre­sent­ing infor­ma­tion that 70 per­cent of the audi­ence know is false.

When this hap­pens peo­ple just loose inter­est in view­ing the pro­gram­ming.

That is what adver­tis­ers are con­cerned with cur­rent­ly, when you see a seg­ment air that is so biased and full of lies and right after that you see an adver­tise­ment for an auto­mo­bile asso­ci­a­tion can plan a role in cre­at­ing a neg­a­tive view­ing expe­ri­ence, that is not some­thing that adver­tis­ers want to see.

These days Google can tell you more about what is going on in the world than most of the (hard news) broad­cast­ers.

That is some­thing that adver­tis­ers should under­stand when com­mit­ting resources to the tra­di­tion­al media.